Journals / Joint diseases and related surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

Arthroscopic treatment of tibial eminence fractures using double-loop endobutton device: Surgical technique and short-term treatment outcomes

Pages
456–462
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Using double-loop endobutton device provides successful results to fix tibial eminence fractures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to explain the arthroscopic surgical technique of double-loop endobutton device for tibial eminence fractures and share the outcomes of this treatment method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: Thirteen patients (10 males, 3 females; mean age 19.9±5.6 years; range, 14 to 34 years) with tibial eminence fractures type II, IIIa, and IIIb were analyzed retrospectively between March 2017 and March 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Using double-loop endobutton device provides successful results to fix tibial eminence fractures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to explain the arthroscopic surgical technique of double-loop endobutton device for tibial eminence fractures and share the outcomes of this treatment method. Patients and methods: Thirteen patients (10 males, 3 females; mean age 19.9±5.6 years; range, 14 to 34 years) with tibial eminence fractures type II, IIIa, and IIIb were analyzed retrospectively between March 2017 and March 2019. Knee laxity, Tegner Lysholm knee scores, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, knee mobility, Lachman test, and bone union were analyzed after the arthroscopic fracture fixation with double-loop endobutton device at first and sixth months after surgery. Results: First month mean IKDC scores were 38.0±7.0 and mean Tegner Lysholm scores were 50.3±5.8. Sixth month mean IKDC scores were 80.2±4.0 and mean Tegner Lysholm scores were 87.1±5.4. All patients showed negative Lachman test and negative pivot-shift test at final follow-up. Radiological bone union without reduction loss was also seen in all patients. Conclusion: Using double-loop endobutton device provides successful results to fix tibial eminence fractures.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, B. K., ÇİFTCİ, S., YILDIRIM, A., GÜLEÇ, A. (2022). Arthroscopic treatment of tibial eminence fractures using double-loop endobutton device: Surgical technique and short-term treatment outcomes. Joint diseases and related surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 456–462. https://ajindex.com/articles/559350

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Meyers MH, McKeever FM. Fracture of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1959;41-A:209- 20
  2. Atik OŞ. Surgical versus conservative treatment for torn anterior cruciate ligament. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2020;31:159-60
  3. Faivre B, Benea H, Klouche S, Lespagnol F, Bauer T, Hardy P. An original arthroscopic fixation of adult’s tibial eminence fractures using the Tightrope® device: a report of 8 cases and review of literature. Knee 2014;21:833-9
  4. Zaricznyj B. Avulsion fracture of the tibial eminence: treatment by open reduction and pinning. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1977;59:1111-4
  5. Osti L, Buda M, Soldati F, Del Buono A, Osti R, Maffulli N. Arthroscopic treatment of tibial eminence fracture: a systematic review of different fixation methods. Br Med Bull 2016;118:73-90
  6. Gans I, Baldwin KD, Ganley TJ. Treatment and Management Outcomes of Tibial Eminence Fractures in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med 2014;42:1743-50
  7. Thompson SM, Salmon LJ, Waller A, Linklater J, Roe JP, Pinczewski LA. Twenty-Year Outcome of a Longitudinal Prospective Evaluation of Isolated Endoscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Patellar Tendon or Hamstring Autograft. Am J Sports Med 2016;44:3083-94
  8. Dung TT, Du HG, Long NH, Son LM, Thanh DX, Son DN, et al. Arthroscopic fixation of ACL avulsion fracture in the saint pault hospital: A review of treatment outcomes: Cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2019;48:91-4
  9. Grantham C, Heckmann N, Wang L, Tibone JE, Struhl S, Lee TQ. A biomechanical assessment of a novel double endobutton technique versus a coracoid cerclage sling for acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016;24:1918-24
  10. Schepers T. Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair. Int Orthop 2012;36:1199-206
  11. Struhl S, Wolfson TS, Kummer F. Axial-Plane Biomechanical Evaluation of 2 Suspensory Cortical Button Fixation Constructs for Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2016;4:2325967116674668
  12. Atik OŞ. Is there something new and interesting in my article? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2019;30:69
  13. Briggs KK, Kocher MS, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale for patients with meniscal injury of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2006;88:698-705
  14. Higgins LD, Taylor MK, Park D, Ghodadra N,