SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Joint diseases and related surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Ultrasound-guided Versus Blind Subacromial Corticosteroid and Local Anesthetic Injection in the Treatment of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Study of Efficacy

Nuri ÇETİN
Selin ÖZEN
Najibeh AKBARİ
Huma BÖLÜK ŞENLİKÇİ
Murat HABERAL
Pages
115–122
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was asignificant improvement in VAS for shoulder pain, active ROM,DASH questionnaire score and modified CMS in both groupsfour weeks after treatment (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to compare the effects of ultrasound(US)-guided and blind subacromial corticosteroid and localanesthetic (LA) injection in the treatment of subacromialimpingement syndrome (SIS) on shoulder pain, range of motion(ROM), and functionality.Patients and methods: The prospective study was conductedbetween 01 February 2017 and 31 May 2017.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 29 patientswith clinical findings and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)consistent with SIS were randomized into two groups: 14 patientsreceived US-guided subacromial corticosteroid and LA injectionand 15 patients received a blind subacromial corticosteroid andLA injection.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was asignificant improvement in VAS for shoulder pain, active ROM,DASH questionnaire score and modified CMS in both groupsfour weeks after treatment (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to compare the effects of ultrasound(US)-guided and blind subacromial corticosteroid and localanesthetic (LA) injection in the treatment of subacromialimpingement syndrome (SIS) on shoulder pain, range of motion(ROM), and functionality.Patients and methods: The prospective study was conductedbetween 01 February 2017 and 31 May 2017. A total of 29 patientswith clinical findings and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)consistent with SIS were randomized into two groups: 14 patientsreceived US-guided subacromial corticosteroid and LA injectionand 15 patients received a blind subacromial corticosteroid andLA injection. Patients were evaluated before and one monthafter treatment. One patient was lost to follow up. The primaryoutcome measure was a visual analog scale (VAS) for shoulderpain. Secondary outcomes were active shoulder ROM in flexionand abduction, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand(DASH) questionnaire and the modified Constant-Murley Score(CMS).Results: Twenty eight patients (11 males, 17 females; mean age39.5 in the US guided group and 42.5 in the blind group; range20 to 64 years in both groups) completed the study. There was asignificant improvement in VAS for shoulder pain, active ROM,DASH questionnaire score and modified CMS in both groupsfour weeks after treatment (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, N., ÖZEN, S., AKBARİ, N., ŞENLİKÇİ, H. B., HABERAL, M. (2022). Ultrasound-guided Versus Blind Subacromial Corticosteroid and Local Anesthetic Injection in the Treatment of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Study of Efficacy. Joint diseases and related surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 115–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/559346

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Urwin M, Symmons D, Allison T, Brammah T, Busby H, Roxby M, et al. Estimating the burden of musculoskeletal disorders in the community: the comparative prevalence of symptoms at different anatomical sites, and the relation to social deprivation. Ann Rheum Dis 1998;57:649-55.
  2. Ostör AJ, Richards CA, Prevost AT, Speed CA, Hazleman BL. Diagnosis and relation to general health of shoulder disorders presenting to primary care. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44:800-5.
  3. Michener LA, McClure PW, Karduna AR. Anatomical and biomechanical mechanisms of subacromial impingement syndrome. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003;18:369-79.
  4. Fu FH, Harner CD, Klein AH. Shoulder impingement syndrome. A critical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;269:162-73. van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Jong BA, Bouter LM. Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management. Ann Rheum Dis 1995;54:959-64.
  5. Karthikeyan S, Kwong HT, Upadhyay PK, Parsons N, Drew SJ, Griffin D. A double-blind randomised controlled study comparing subacromial injection of tenoxicam or methylprednisolone in patients with subacromial impingement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92:77-82.
  6. Boonard M, Sumanont S, Arirachakaran A, Apiwatanakul P, Boonrod A, Kanchanatawan W, et al. Short-term outcomes of subacromial injection of combined corticosteroid with low-volume compared to high-volume local anesthetic for rotator cuff impingement syndrome: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2018;28:1079-87.
  7. Soh E, Li W, Ong KO, Chen W, Bautista D. Image-guided versus blind corticosteroid injections in adults with shoulder pain: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12:137. Cole BF, Peters KS, Hackett L, Murrell GA. Ultrasoundguided versus blind subacromial corticosteroid injections for subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 2016;44:702-7.
  8. Bloom JE, Rischin A, Johnston RV, Buchbinder R. Imageguided versus blind glucocorticoid injection for shoulder pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;(8):CD009147. Dogu B, Yucel SD, Sag SY, Bankaoglu M, Kuran B. Blind or ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections and shortterm response in subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, prospective study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012;91:658-65.
  9. Hawkins RJ, Kennedy JC. Impingement syndrome in athletes. Am J Sports Med 1980;8:151-8.
  10. Garving C, Jakob S, Bauer I, Nadjar R, Brunner UH. Impingement syndrome of the