Journals / Joint diseases and related surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

A brief history of artificial intelligence and robotic surgery in orthopedics & traumatology and future expectations

Pages
653–655
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although studies indicate that new technologies are more successful than humans, the replacement of technology with experience and long-term results with traditional methods will not be observed in the near future.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recently, the rate of the production and renewal of information makes it almost impossible to be updated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The idea of AI, which was first introduced in 1956, has evolved over time by revealing deep learning and evolutionary plexus that can mimic the human neuron cell.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although studies indicate that new technologies are more successful than humans, the replacement of technology with experience and long-term results with traditional methods will not be observed in the near future.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Recently, the rate of the production and renewal of information makes it almost impossible to be updated. It is quite difficult to process and interpret large amounts of data by human beings. Unlimited memory capacities, learning abilities, artificial intelligence (AI) applications, and robotic surgery techniques cause orthopedic surgeons to be concerned about losing their jobs. The idea of AI, which was first introduced in 1956, has evolved over time by revealing deep learning and evolutionary plexus that can mimic the human neuron cell. Image processing is the leading improvement in developed algorithms. Theoretically, these algorithms appear to be quite successful in interpreting medical images and orthopedic decision support systems for preoperative evaluation. Robotic surgeons have emerged as significant competitors in carrying out the taken decisions. The first robotic applications of orthopedic surgery started in 1992 with the ROBODOC system. Applications started with hip arthroplasty continued with knee arthroplasty. Publications indicate that problems such as blood loss and infection caused by the long operation time in the early stages have been overcome in time with the help of learning systems. Comparative studies conducted with humans indicate that robots are better than humans in providing limb lengthening, patient satisfaction, and cost. As in all new technologies, the developments in both AI applications and robotics surgery indicate that technology is in favor in terms of cost/benefit analyses. Although studies indicate that new technologies are more successful than humans, the replacement of technology with experience and long-term results with traditional methods will not be observed in the near future.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEYAZ, S. (2022). A brief history of artificial intelligence and robotic surgery in orthopedics & traumatology and future expectations. Joint diseases and related surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 653–655. https://ajindex.com/articles/559324

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Densen P. Challenges and opportunities facing medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2011;122:48-58
  2. McCarthy J. The inversion of functions defined by Turing machines. Automata studies, edited by C. E. Shannon and J. McCarthy, Annals of Mathematics studies no. 34, lithoprinted. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1956. p. 177-81
  3. Beyaz S, Açıcı K, Sümer E. Femoral neck fracture detection in X-ray images using deep learning and genetic algorithm approaches. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2020;31:175-83
  4. Pranata YD, Wang KC, Wang JC, Idram I, Lai JY, Liu JW, et al. Deep learning and SURF for automated classification and detection of calcaneus fractures in CT images. Comput Meth Prog Bio 2019;171:27-37
  5. Li Q, Zhong L, Huang H, Liu H, Qin Y, Wang Y, et al. Auxiliary diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip by automated detection of Sharp's angle on standardized anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e18500
  6. Chung SW, Han SS, Lee JW, Oh KS, Kim NR, Yoon JP, et al. Automated detection and classification of the proximal humerus fracture by using deep learning algorithm. Acta Orthop 2018;89:468-73
  7. Borjali A, Chen AF, Muratoglu OK, Morid MA, Varadarajan KM. Detecting total hip replacement prosthesis design on plain radiographs using deep convolutional neural network. J Orthop Res 2020;38:1465-71
  8. Jahng KH, Kamara E, Hepinstall MS. Haptic robotics in total hip arthroplasty. In: Scuderi G, Tria A, editors. Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics. Springer: Cham: 2015. p. 1-15
  9. Mittelstadt B, Paul H, Kazanzides P, Zuhars J, Williamson B, Pettitt R, et al. Development of a surgical robot for cementless total hip replacement. Robotica 1993;11:553-60
  10. Jacofsky DJ, Allen M. Robotics in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review. J Arthroplasty 2016;31:2353-63
  11. Faust RA. Robotics in Surgery: History, Current, and Future Applications. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2007
  12. Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, Heeckt PF. Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee 2002;9:173-80
  13. Davies B. Robotic surgery - a personal view of the past, present and future. Int J Adv Robot Syst 2015;12:54
  14. Trehan A, Dunn TJ. The robotic surgery monopoly is a poor deal BMJ 2013;347:f7470 15. Physicians and Surgeons: Occupational Outlook Handbook. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available at: www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/physicians-andsurgeons. htm [Accessed: