Journals / Joint diseases and related surgery / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

Surgical outcomes of scaphoid fracture osteosynthesiswith magnesium screws

Pages
721–728
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Magnesium-based compression screws can be safelyused for acute scaphoid fractures considering their favorablefunctional and radiological results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the mid-term functionaland radiological outcomes of magnesium-based screws in thetreatment of scaphoid fractures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: Between February 2015 and February2018, a total of 21 patients (18 males, 3 females; mean age:28.5±5.8 years; range, 19 to 39 years) with acute scaphoid waistfractures who underwent fracture fixation with biologicallydegradable magnesium-based compression screws wereretrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Magnesium-based compression screws can be safelyused for acute scaphoid fractures considering their favorablefunctional and radiological results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the mid-term functionaland radiological outcomes of magnesium-based screws in thetreatment of scaphoid fractures. Patients and methods: Between February 2015 and February2018, a total of 21 patients (18 males, 3 females; mean age:28.5±5.8 years; range, 19 to 39 years) with acute scaphoid waistfractures who underwent fracture fixation with biologicallydegradable magnesium-based compression screws wereretrospectively analyzed. Fractures were classified accordingto the Herbert and Fisher classification. The absence of pain onpalpation and painless active range of motion were accepted asthe signs of union. Results: The mean follow-up was 43.3±5.3 (range, 36 to 52)months. According to the Herbert and Fisher classification,nine patients had type B1 and 12 patients had type B2 scaphoidfractures. Union was achieved in all cases. The mean timeto union was 11.2±1.5 (range, 9 to 14) weeks. The mean gripstrength, flexion, and extension were 43.57°, 73.57°, and 76.43°,respectively. The grip strength, pinch strength, and range ofmotion of the operated side were evaluated at the final follow-upvisit and compared with the contralateral side (control group). Nocomplication occurred. Any screw was not removed. Conclusion: Magnesium-based compression screws can be safelyused for acute scaphoid fractures considering their favorablefunctional and radiological results.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOY, S., KİBAR, B., POLAT, O. (2022). Surgical outcomes of scaphoid fracture osteosynthesiswith magnesium screws. Joint diseases and related surgery, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 721–728. https://ajindex.com/articles/559262

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acar B, Köse Ö, Turan A, Katı YA, Güler F. Single versus double screw fixation for the treatment of scaphoid waist fractures: Finite element analysis and preliminary clinical results in scaphoid nonunion. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2020;31:73-80
  2. Kılıç B, Çalışkan M, Agar A, Uzun B, Ertem F, Gülabi D, et al. Comparison of two different screw trajectories in the treatment of oblique scaphoid fractures: A mechanical study on composite bone models. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2021;32:377-82
  3. Fowler JR, Hughes TB. Scaphoid fractures. Clin Sports Med 2015;34:37-50
  4. Clementson M, Jørgsholm P, Besjakov J, Thomsen N, Björkman A. Conservative treatment versus arthroscopicassisted screw fixation of scaphoid waist fractures--a randomized trial with minimum 4-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am 2015;40:1341-8
  5. Gregory JJ, Mohil RS, Ng AB, Warner JG, Hodgson SP. Comparison of Herbert and Acutrak screws in the treatment of scaphoid non-union and delayed union. Acta Orthop Belg 2008;74:761-5
  6. Radford PJ, Matthewson MH, Meggitt BF. The Herbert screw for delayed and non-union of scaphoid fractures: A review of fifty cases. J Hand Surg Br 1990;15:455-9
  7. Dias JJ, Brealey SD, Fairhurst C, Amirfeyz R, Bhowal B, Blewitt N, et al. Surgery versus cast immobilisation for adults with a bicortical fracture of the scaphoid waist (SWIFFT): A pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial. Lancet 2020;396:390-401
  8. Raikin SM, Ching AC. Bioabsorbable fixation in foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Clin 2005;10:667-84
  9. Böstman OM, Pihlajamäki HK. Adverse tissue reactions to bioabsorbable fixation devices. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;(371):216-27
  10. Seitz, JM, Lucas A, Kirschner M. Magnesium-based compression screws: A novelty in the clinical use of implants. JOM 2016;68:1177-82
  11. Waizy H, Diekmann J, Weizbauer A, Reifenrath J, Bartsch I, Neubert V, et al. In vivo study of a biodegradable orthopedic screw (MgYREZr-alloy) in a rabbit model for up to 12 months. J Biomater Appl 2014;28:667-75
  12. Rahim MI, Eifler R, Rais B, Mueller PP. Alkalization is responsible for antibacterial effects of corroding magnesium. J Biomed Mater Res A 2015;103:3526-32
  13. May H, Alper Kati Y, Gumussuyu G, Yunus Emre T, Unal M, Kose O. Bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures. J Orthop Traumatol 2020;21:9
  14. Windhagen H, Radtke K, Weizbauer A, Diekmann J, Noll Y, Kreimeyer U, et al. Biodegradable magnesium-based screw clinically