Journals / Joint diseases and related surgery / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index

Pages
497–503
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Western Ontario RotatorCuff (WORC), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI),and the Society of American Shoulder and Elbow SurgeonsStandardized Shoulder Assessment (ASES) scores were used toconduct concurrent validity.Results: The Cronbach alpha value of the scale was foundto be excellent as 0.92 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to adapt the Western OntarioOsteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index specific toshoulder osteoarthritis into Turkish and to evaluate its validityand reliability.Patients and methods: The WOOS index was translated andculturally adapted into Turkish, systematically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was appliedto a total of 68 patients (17 males, 51 females; mean age:61.5±8.7 years; range, 45 to 80 years) with osteoarthritis of theshoulder treated conservatively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Western Ontario RotatorCuff (WORC), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI),and the Society of American Shoulder and Elbow SurgeonsStandardized Shoulder Assessment (ASES) scores were used toconduct concurrent validity.Results: The Cronbach alpha value of the scale was foundto be excellent as 0.92 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to adapt the Western OntarioOsteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index specific toshoulder osteoarthritis into Turkish and to evaluate its validityand reliability.Patients and methods: The WOOS index was translated andculturally adapted into Turkish, systematically. It was appliedto a total of 68 patients (17 males, 51 females; mean age:61.5±8.7 years; range, 45 to 80 years) with osteoarthritis of theshoulder treated conservatively. The reliability of the scale waschecked through internal consistency and test-retest methods.Internal consistency was analyzed with Cronbach alpha value.Test-retest reliability was assessed using an intraclass correlationcoefficient (ICC) with 25 patients. The Western Ontario RotatorCuff (WORC), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI),and the Society of American Shoulder and Elbow SurgeonsStandardized Shoulder Assessment (ASES) scores were used toconduct concurrent validity.Results: The Cronbach alpha value of the scale was foundto be excellent as 0.92 (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Eren, T. K., KAPTAN, A. Y., ÖZAL, Ş., GÜZEL, N. A., KAFA, N. (2022). Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index. Joint diseases and related surgery, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 497–503. https://ajindex.com/articles/559255

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Petersson CJ. Degeneration of the gleno-humeral joint. An anatomical study. Acta Orthop Scand 1983;54:277-83
  2. Özer M, Ataoğlu MB, Çetinkaya M, Ayanoğlu T, Kaptan AY, Kanatlı U. Do intra-articular pathologies accompanying symptomatic acromioclavicular joint degeneration vary across age groups? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2019;30:2-9
  3. Millett PJ, Gobezie R, Boykin RE. Shoulder osteoarthritis: Diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 2008;78:605-11
  4. Lo IK, Griffin S, Kirkley A. The development of a diseasespecific quality of life measurement tool for osteoarthritis of the shoulder: The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001;9:771-8
  5. Tuğay U, Tuğay N, Gelecek N, Özkan M. Oxford Shoulder Score: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011;131:687-94
  6. Celik D, Atalar AC, Demirhan M, Dirican A. Translation, cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Turkish ASES questionnaire. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21:2184-9
  7. Najafov E, Özal Ş, Kaptan AY, Ulucaköy C, Kanatlı U, Ataoğlu B, et al. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of LHB score. J Sport Rehabil 2021;30:30-6
  8. Çelik D. Turkish version of the modified Constant-Murley score and standardized test protocol: Reliability and validity. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2016;50:69-75
  9. Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of health status measures. Am Acad of Orthop Surg 2002;12:1-9 10. El O, Bircan C, Gulbahar S, Demiral Y, Sahin E, Baydar M, et al. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. Rheumatol Int 2006;26:1101-8
  10. Bumin G, Tuzun EH, Tonga E. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI): Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 2008;21:57-62
  11. Royston P. Approximating the Shapiro-Wilk W-test for nonnormality. Stats Comp 1992;2:117-9
  12. Snyder CF, Aaronson NK, Choucair AK, Elliott TE, Greenhalgh J, Halyard MY, et al. Implementing patientreported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res 2012;21:1305-14
  13. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005;19:231-40
  14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for asses