Journals / Joint diseases and related surgery / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders

Pages
142–148
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, one should keep in mind that the presence of advanced subacromial impingement may indicate advanced biceps tendon pathologies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to investigate the relationship between proximal biceps tendon disorders and the degree of subacromial impingement in patients who underwent arthroscopic subacromial debridement.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: Between January 2015 and June 2021, a total of 110 patients (44 males, 66 females; mean age: 52.5±11.43 years; range, 15 to 78 years) who underwent arthroscopic subacromial decompression were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, one should keep in mind that the presence of advanced subacromial impingement may indicate advanced biceps tendon pathologies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the relationship between proximal biceps tendon disorders and the degree of subacromial impingement in patients who underwent arthroscopic subacromial debridement. Patients and methods: Between January 2015 and June 2021, a total of 110 patients (44 males, 66 females; mean age: 52.5±11.43 years; range, 15 to 78 years) who underwent arthroscopic subacromial decompression were retrospectively analyzed. The degree of the subacromial impingement observed during arthroscopy was classified into four stages according to the Neer classification. We classified proximal biceps tendon disorders as five grades according to the Nirschl classification. The proportional relationship between subacromial impingement and biceps tendinopathy severity was analyzed. Results: While biceps tendon degeneration was found to be significantly lower in patients with mild or no subacromial impingement, high rates of severe biceps tendon degeneration were observed in patients with high degree of subacromial impingement. A total of 75% of the patients who had no subacromial impingement had no biceps tendon disorder. Approximately 50% of the patients with Stage 1 subacromial impingement did not have biceps disorder, 31.3% had inflammation, and 12.5% had minor degeneration. In Stage 2 subacromial impingement group, the ratio of inflammation (42.9%) and minor degeneration (42.9%) of biceps tendon greatly increased, and the highest rate of biceps tendon degeneration was observed in the most advanced stage (Stage 3) subacromial impingement group (39.3%) (p=0.001). Conclusion: The stage of subacromial impingement is correlated with the degree of biceps degeneration. Therefore, one should keep in mind that the presence of advanced subacromial impingement may indicate advanced biceps tendon pathologies.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDOĞAN, N. H., GÜLTAÇ, E., KILINÇ, C. Y., ŞAHİN, İ. G., CAN, F. İ. (2022). Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders. Joint diseases and related surgery, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 142–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/559161

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akbari N, Ozen S, Şenlikçi HB, Haberal M, Çetin N. Ultrasound-guided versus blind subacromial corticosteroid and local anesthetic injection in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome: A randomized study of efficacy. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2020;31:115-22
  2. Krupp RJ, Kevern MA, Gaines MD, Kotara S, Singleton SB. Long head of the biceps tendon pain: Differential diagnosis and treatment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39:55-70
  3. Sethi N, Wright R, Yamaguchi K. Disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999;8:644-54
  4. Hsu SH, Miller SL, Curtis AS. Long head of biceps tendon pathology: Management alternatives. Clin Sports Med 2008;27:747-62
  5. Bennett WF. Visualization of the anatomy of the rotator interval and bicipital sheath. Arthroscopy 2001;17:107- 11
  6. Arai R, Mochizuki T, Yamaguchi K, Sugaya H, Kobayashi M, Nakamura T, et al. Functional anatomy of the superior glenohumeral and coracohumeral ligaments and the subscapularis tendon in view of stabilization of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010;19:58-64
  7. Khan R, Satyapal KS, Naidoo N, Lazarus L. Long head of biceps brachii tendon and transverse humeral ligament morphometry and their associated pathology. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2020;79:359-65
  8. Varacallo M, Mair SD. Proximal Biceps Tendinitis and Tendinopathy. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Available at: https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK533002/ 9. Ahrens PM, Boileau P. The long head of biceps and associated tendinopathy. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89:1001-9
  9. Murthi AM, Vosburgh CL, Neviaser TJ. The incidence of pathologic changes of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2000;9:382-5
  10. Curtis AS, Snyder SJ. Evaluation and treatment of biceps tendon pathology. Orthop Clin North Am 1993;24:33-43
  11. Neer CS 2nd. Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;(173):70-7
  12. Nirschl RP, Ashman ES. Elbow tendinopathy: Tennis elbow. Clin Sports Med 2003;22:813-36
  13. Goldberg SS, Bigliani LU. Shoulder impingement revisited: Advanced concepts of pathomechanics and treatment. Instr Course Lect 2006;55:17-27
  14. Neviaser TJ, Neviaser RJ, Neviaser JS, Neviaser JS. The four-in-one arthroplasty for the painful arc syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982;(163):107-12. 16. van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Jong BA, Bouter LM. Shoulder disorders in general practice: Incidence, patient characteristics, and management. Ann