SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 24

Adaptation of Motivation and Self-Regulation Towards Technology Learning Scale (MSRTL) to Turkish: Validity and Reliability Study

Teknoloji Öğrenimine Karşı Motivasyon ve Öz-düzenleme Ölçeği’nin (TÖMÖD) Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Ali Rıza Şekerci
Pages
487–514
Publication Date
2017-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The internal consistency coefficient which was calculated for each factor on the scale and varied between .76 and .84 was an important result in terms of the scale’s reliability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out in order to adapt “The Motivation and Self-regulation towards Technology Learning (MSRTL) scale which was developed by Liou and Kuo (2014).
📊
Key Findings & Data:One thousand three hundred and ninety-four students including 759 girls and 635 boys participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The internal consistency coefficient which was calculated for each factor on the scale and varied between .76 and .84 was an important result in terms of the scale’s reliability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Teknolojiye karşı motivasyon · teknolojiye karşı öz-düzenleme · 8.sınıf

Abstract

This study was carried out in order to adapt “The Motivation and Self-regulation towards Technology Learning (MSRTL) scale which was developed by Liou and Kuo (2014). One thousand three hundred and ninety-four students including 759 girls and 635 boys participated in the study. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, dependent t-test and Pearson correlation analysis was performed during the data-analysis. As a result the reliability and validity studies of the Turkish version of MSRTL which was developed by Liou and Kuo (2014) and consisted of seven factors and 39 items were conducted. It was stated that the seven factors, 37 items version of the scale was valid and reliable and it can be used in Turkey in cultural aspect. The internal consistency coefficient which was calculated for each factor on the scale and varied between .76 and .84 was an important result in terms of the scale’s reliability.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Liou ve Kuo (2014) tarafından geliştirilen “Teknoloji Öğrenimine Karşı Motivasyon ve Öz-düzenleme (TÖMÖD)” ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmaya 1394 öğrenci (759 kız ve 635 erkek) katılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, bağımlı t-testi ve pearson korelasyon analizi yapılmıştır. Sonuç olarak Liou ve Kuo (2014) tarafından yedi faktör 39 madde olarak geliştirilen “TÖMÖD” ün Türkçeye uyarlanarak geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması yapılmış, ölçeğin yedi faktör 37 maddelik halinin kültürel açıdan Türkiye’de kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek olduğu belirlenmiştir. AFA analizi sonucu ölçeğin toplam varyansın %57.66’sını açıkladığını göstermiştir. Ölçekteki her bir faktör için hesaplanan ve .76 ile.84 aralığında değişen iç tutarlılık katsayıları ölçeğin güvenilir olduğunu göstermesi açısından önemli sonuçlardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şekerci, A. R. (2017). Adaptation of Motivation and Self-Regulation Towards Technology Learning Scale (MSRTL) to Turkish: Validity and Reliability Study. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 24, 487–514. https://ajindex.com/articles/55915

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.project2061.org/tools/benchol/bolframe.htm
  2. Alamin, A. A., Shaoqing, G., & Le, Z. (2015). The Development of Educational Technology Policies (1996-2012)
  3. Lessons from China and the USA, International Education Studies, 8(6),142-150.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n6p142
  4. Al-Alwan, A. F. (2008). Self-regulated learning in high and low achieving students at Al-Hussein Bin Talal University (AHU) in Jordan. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 1(1), 1-13.
  5. Arbuckle, J. L. (2012). IBM AMOS 21 User’s Guide. Chicago: SPSS Inc. Retrieved fromftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/amos/21.0/en/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Amos_Users_Guide.pdf Atkinson, J. W. (1966). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior. In J. W. Atkinson & N. T. Feather (Eds.), A theory of achievement motivation (pp. l-31). New York: Wiley. Baloğlu, M. (2005). Matematik kaygısı derecelendirme ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması, dil geçerliği ve ön psikometri incelemesi [Adaptation of the mathematics anxiety rating scale to Turkish, language validity and preliminar psychometric properties]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi[Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice], 5(1), 7-30.
  6. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2),191-215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122 Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287.
  7. Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Eds.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45).
  8. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman & Company. Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş amos uygulamaları [Structural Equation Modeling Introduction: AMOS Applications]. İstanbul:
  10. Ezgi Kitabevi.
  11. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199-231.
  12. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. & Zeidner, M. (2000). Self-regulation. An introductory ove