Journals / Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations / 2014 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Omurilik yaralanmaların patofizyolojisi

Pathophysiology of the spinal cord injury

Pages
131–136
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Pathophysiological changes occurring after SCI has to be well understood in order to develop ideal treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes significant morbidity and mortality leading to serious social problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although many studies conducted on it, any universal treatment protocol has not been accepted to date.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Pathophysiological changes occurring after SCI has to be well understood in order to develop ideal treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes significant morbidity and mortality leading to serious social problems. Although many studies conducted on it, any universal treatment protocol has not been accepted to date. Studies about treatment of SCI focused on two mechanisms. First is usage of neuroprotective agents and second are regeneration studies to improve axonal functions of injured spinal cord. Pathophysiological changes occurring after SCI has to be well understood in order to develop ideal treatment.

Özet

Omurilik yaralanması toplumsal düzeyde problemlere yol açan morbidite ve mortalitenin önemli nedenlerindendir.Günümüze kadar pek çok çalışma yapılmasına rağmen evresel tedavi protokolü geliştirilememiştir. Omurilik yaralanmalarının tedavisinde çalışmalar iki mekanizma üzerine yoğunlaşmıştır. Birincisi hasar görmüş omuriliği koruyucu nöroprotektif ajanların kullanılması diğeri hasarlanmış omurilikte aksonların fonksiyonlarını kazanabilecekleri rejenerasyon çalışmalarıdır. Etkin tedavinin bulunabilmesi için omurilik yaralanması sonrası patofizyolojik değişiklikler iyi bilinmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURAN, Y., KELEŞ, A., YILMAZ, T. (2022). Omurilik yaralanmaların patofizyolojisi. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 131–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/556398

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Tator CH. Biology of neurological recovery and func- tional restoration after spinal cord injury. Neurosur- gery 1998;42:696-707.
  2. Dumont RJ, Verma S, Okonkwo DO, et al. Acute spinal cord injury, part II: contemporary pharmacotherapy. Clin Neuropharmacol 2001;24:265-279.
  3. Li M, Ona VO, Chen M, et al. Friedlander RM. Func- tional role and therapeutic implications of neuronal caspase-1 and -3 in a mouse model of traumatic spi- nal cord injury. Neuroscience 2000;99:333-342.
  4. Dumont AS, Dumont RJ, Oskouian RJ. Will improved understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in acute spinal cord injury improve the po- tential for therapeutic intervention? Curr Opin Neurol 2002;15:713-720. Fehlings MG. Summary statement: the use of meth- ylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury. Spine 2001;26:S55. Schwab ME. Repairing the injured spinal cord. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2002;295:1029-1031. Tator CH. Review of experimental spinal cord injury with emphasis on the local and systemic circulatory effects. Neurochirurgie 1991;37:291-302.
  5. Lasfargues JE, Custis D, Morrone F, et al. A model for estimating spinal cord injury prevalence in the United States. Paraplegia 1995;33:62-68.
  6. Dryden DM, Saunders LD, Rowe BH, et al. The epi- demiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Alberta, Canada. Can J Neurol Sci 2003;30:113-121.
  7. Griffin MR, Opitz JL, Kurland LT, et al. Traumatic spi- nal cord injury in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1935- 1981. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:884-895.
  8. Pagliacci MC, Celani MG, Zampolini M, et al. An Ital- ian survey of traumatic spinal cord injury. The Gruppo Italiano Studio Epidemiologico Mielolesioni study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:1266-1275.
  9. Karacan I, Koyuncu H, Pekel O, et al. Traumatic spi- nal cord injuries in Turkey: a nation-wide epidemio- logical study. Spinal cord 2000;38:697-701.
  10. Citterio A, Franceschini M, Spizzichino L, et al. Non- traumatic spinal cord injury: an Italian survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1483-1487. Allen AR: Surgery of experimental lesion of spinal cord equivalent to crush injury of fracture disloca- tion of spinal column. A preliminary report:. J.A.M.A. 1911.;57:878-880. Kaptanoğlu E. Omurilik yaralanmasının patofizyolo- jisi,, Vol. cilt 2 Ankara: Temel Nöroşirürji 2010:, 1623- 1635, pp. Anderson DK, Means ED, Waters TR, Green ES. Mi- crovascular perfusion and metabolism in injured spi- nal cord after methylprednisolone treatment. J Neuro- surg 1982;56:106-113.
  11. Fehlings MG, Sekhon LH, Tator C. The role and