Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship between Leader-Member Exchange and Innovative Work Behavior:The Mediating Role of the Voice Behavior

Pages
1306–1321
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the SET, thisresearch helps to understand how certain LMX which encourage high-quality exchange relationships withthe supervisors and foster employee voice behaviors, may nurture employee IWBs in the organizations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose - This research aims to examine the mediation mechanism between leader-member exchange(LMX) and innovative work behavior (IWB) through employee voice behavior.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within this context, employees performing in higher quality LMX relationships with IWB arelikely to exhibit more voice behavior.Design/methodology/approach – Self-reported questionnaires were applied to obtain data from 360employees mainly with engineering qualifications from four companies in the defense sector in Turkey.Data were collected with a simple random sampling method in November and December 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the SET, thisresearch helps to understand how certain LMX which encourage high-quality exchange relationships withthe supervisors and foster employee voice behaviors, may nurture employee IWBs in the organizations.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose - This research aims to examine the mediation mechanism between leader-member exchange(LMX) and innovative work behavior (IWB) through employee voice behavior. Specifically, this researchexploited the social exchange theory (SET) to examine the influence of LMX on IWB through employee voicebehavior. Within this context, employees performing in higher quality LMX relationships with IWB arelikely to exhibit more voice behavior.Design/methodology/approach – Self-reported questionnaires were applied to obtain data from 360employees mainly with engineering qualifications from four companies in the defense sector in Turkey.Data were collected with a simple random sampling method in November and December 2020. Hypotheseswere tested using correlation and regression analysis. The reason why the defense sector was selected forthis study is the fact that the defense industry field has characteristics that make for a unique workingenvironment.Findings - The findings show that LMX positively and significantly affects IWB and additionally voicebehavior has a mediating role in this relationship. LMX had a significant influence on employee voicebehavior that was ultimately associated with IWB. Finally, Voice behavior mediated the positive correlationbetween LMX and IWB, and stronger voice behavior boosted the indirect relationship.Discussion - This research reveals the effects of LMX and provides practical suggestions to help employeesexpress their opinions in the organization to enhance innovation performance. Based on the SET, thisresearch helps to understand how certain LMX which encourage high-quality exchange relationships withthe supervisors and foster employee voice behaviors, may nurture employee IWBs in the organizations.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖKMEN, A., METE, E. S. (2022). The Relationship between Leader-Member Exchange and Innovative Work Behavior:The Mediating Role of the Voice Behavior. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 1306–1321. https://ajindex.com/articles/556375

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abstein, A. and Spieth, P. (2014). Exploring HRM Meta-features that foster employees’ innovative work behaviour in times of increasing work–life conflict, Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(2), 211- 225. Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T. and Haslam, S.A. (2007). Creative innovation or crazy irrelevance? The contribution of group norms and social identity to creative behavior, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 410-416.
  2. Amo, B.W. and Kolvereid, L. (2005). Organizational strategy, individual personality and innovation behavior, Journal of Enterprising Culture, 13(1), 7-19.
  3. Anderson, N., Poto.cnik, K. and Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of thescience review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297- 1333. Avey,J.B., Wernsing, T.S. and Palanski, M.E. (2012). Exploring the process of ethical leadership: The mediating role of employee voice and psychological ownership, Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21- 34. Bai, Y., Lin, L. and Li, P.P. (2016). How to enable employee creativity in a team context: A cross-level mediating process of transformational leadership, Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3240-3250.
  4. Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  5. Basu, R. and Green, S.G. (1997). Leader-member exchange and transformational leadership: an empirical examination of innovative behaviors in leader-member dyads, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(6), 477-499.
  6. Bateman, T.S. and Crant, J.M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
  7. Bauer, T.N. and Green, S.G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: a longitudinal test, Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538-1567.
  8. Blau, P.M. (1964).
  9. Exchange and power in social life, New York, NY, John Wiley and Sons. Blau, T.H. (1984).
  10. Foreword in Kaslow, F. (Ed.) Psychotherapy with psychotherapists, New York, John Wiley and Sons. Bos-Nehles, A.C. and Veenendaal, A.A. (2019). Perceptions of HR practices and innovative work behavior: the moderating effect of an innovative climate, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(18), 2661-2683.
  11. Botero, I.C. and Van Dyne, L. (2009). Employee voice behavior: interactive effects of LMX