Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of the Performance of Equity Funds in Turkey

Pages
1200–1215
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion – Although the performance difference between the funds is high according to the TEFASplatform data, it has been determined that this difference is due to the investment of some funds in small scale companies and is not sustainable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – The young population, the ongoing inflation problem, dynamic market structure, and theongoing geopolitical risks place Turkey in a unique position in comparison with other emerging markets.Recently, with the decrease in interest rates, the demand for stocks has surged and the number of stockinvestors has increased by 30% in a short period of time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This situation has boosted the need for equityfunds, and it has become important to measure the performance of these funds effectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion – Although the performance difference between the funds is high according to the TEFASplatform data, it has been determined that this difference is due to the investment of some funds in small scale companies and is not sustainable.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose – The young population, the ongoing inflation problem, dynamic market structure, and theongoing geopolitical risks place Turkey in a unique position in comparison with other emerging markets.Recently, with the decrease in interest rates, the demand for stocks has surged and the number of stockinvestors has increased by 30% in a short period of time. This situation has boosted the need for equityfunds, and it has become important to measure the performance of these funds effectively. The purposeof this study is to measure the performance of stock funds and to determine the statistical significancelevels of the fund performances announced to the public on the TEFAS platform. Design/methodology/approach – In this study the performance of equity funds in Turkey has been testedby following the FF3F approach. Firstly, reference portfolios to be used for performance comparison werecreated. Then stock-based performances of all equity funds that operate continuously in Turkey duringthe last five years were tested. Findings – According to the findings of the research, it was observed that the funds on average hadperformances exceeding the index. However, it has been determined that the results in the TEFAS platformmay not be very meaningful when comparing the stock funds among themselves. Discussion – Although the performance difference between the funds is high according to the TEFASplatform data, it has been determined that this difference is due to the investment of some funds in small scale companies and is not sustainable.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, S., AYDINLI, M. (2022). Evaluation of the Performance of Equity Funds in Turkey. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 1200–1215. https://ajindex.com/articles/556334

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Acaravcı, S. K. and Karaome, Y. (2017). FamaFrench five factor model: evidence from Turkey, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(6), 130-137.
  2. Alptekin, N. and Şıklar, E. (2009). Türk Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonlarının Çok Kriterli Performans Değerlendirmesi: TOPSIS Metodu. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (25). Anadu, K., Kruttli, M. S., McCabe, P. E., Osambela, E. and Shin, C. (2019). The shift from active to passive investing: potential risks to financial stability?. Available at SSRN 3244467. Aras, G., Çam, İ., Zavalsız, B. and Keskin, S. (2018). Fama-French Çok Faktör Varlık Fiyatlama Modellerinin Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business Administration, 47(2). Atakan, T. and Gökbulut, İ. (2010). Üç Faktörlü Varlik Fiyatlandirma Modelinin Istanbul Menkul Kiymetler Borsasi'nda Uygulanabilirliginin Panel Veri Analizi ile Test Edilmesi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (45). Barak, O. (2007). Hisse senedi piyasasında halka açıklık oranının piyasa fiyati üzerine etkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 10(1-2), 59-72.
  3. Belimam, D., Tan, Y. and Lakhnati, G. (2018). An empirical comparison of asset-pricing models in the Shanghai A-share exchange market. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 25(3), 249-265.
  4. Bloomberg. (2020). https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/XU100:IND (Retrieved on July 20, 2020)
  5. Bloomberght. (2020). QNB Finansbank'ın piyasa değeri borsanın % 20'sine yaklaştı https://www.bloomberght.com/qnb-finansbank-in-piyasa-degeri-borsanin-20-sine-yaklasti-2244612 (Retrieved on July 25, 2020)
  6. Broeders, D. W., Van Oord, A. and Rijsbergen, D. R. (2019). Does it pay to pay performance fees? Empirical evidence from Dutch pension funds. Journal of International Money and Finance, 93, 299-312.
  7. Chan, L. K., Chen, H. L. and Lakonishok, J. (2002). On mutual fund investment styles. The Review of Financial Studies, 15(5), 1407-1437.
  8. Chen, R., Gao, Z., Zhang, X. and Zhu, M. (2018). Mutual fund managers’ prior work experience and their investment skill. Financial Management, 47(1), 3-24.
  9. Coşkun, E. & Çınar, Ö. (2014). Üç faktör varlık fiyatlama modelinin geçerliliği: Borsa İstanbul’da bir inceleme, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(4), 235-250.
  10. Crane, A. D. and Crotty, K. (2018). Passive versus active fund performance: do index funds have skill?. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,