Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Learning from Alliance Partners: The Interplay Between CEO Duality And TMT Functional Background Diversity

Pages
1216–1226
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The studyfindings also extend the scope of upper echelons literatures by establishing the relevance of upper echelonstheory for a novel dependent variable (i.e., learning from alliance partners)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – Strategic alliances are essential vehicles for knowledge acquisition from alliance partnersespecially in the technology related sectors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This research examines the interplay between topmanagement team (TMT) functional background diversity and CEO duality on learning from alliancepartners.Design/methodology/approach – Data for 1012 strategic alliances from Information and Communicationssectors (computer equipment, electronics and telecommunications) in US are collected from multipledatabases: Firm data is retrieved from Compustat database, strategic alliance date is retrieved from SDCPlatinum database, patent data is retrieved from NBER database and finally the TMT information is codedfrom U.S.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The studyfindings also extend the scope of upper echelons literatures by establishing the relevance of upper echelonstheory for a novel dependent variable (i.e., learning from alliance partners)
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose – Strategic alliances are essential vehicles for knowledge acquisition from alliance partnersespecially in the technology related sectors. This research examines the interplay between topmanagement team (TMT) functional background diversity and CEO duality on learning from alliancepartners.Design/methodology/approach – Data for 1012 strategic alliances from Information and Communicationssectors (computer equipment, electronics and telecommunications) in US are collected from multipledatabases: Firm data is retrieved from Compustat database, strategic alliance date is retrieved from SDCPlatinum database, patent data is retrieved from NBER database and finally the TMT information is codedfrom U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) database. We tested our hypotheses using thenegative binomial regression model since our dependent variable is discrete and non-negative (patentcitation counts). Findings – CEO duality moderates the relationship between TMT functional background and learningfrom alliance partner such that the effect of TMT functional background on learning from alliance partneris positive when CEO does not have dual roles and negative when he or she does.Discussion – This study contributes to the strategic alliance and inter-organizational learning literatureby demonstrating the roles of influential actors in the strategy process (i.e., the CEO and TMT). The studyfindings also extend the scope of upper echelons literatures by establishing the relevance of upper echelonstheory for a novel dependent variable (i.e., learning from alliance partners)

🔖

Cite This Article

ATEŞ, N. Y., PASMAN, N. (2022). Learning from Alliance Partners: The Interplay Between CEO Duality And TMT Functional Background Diversity. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 1216–1226. https://ajindex.com/articles/556294

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acikgöz, A., Günsel, A., Kuzey, C., & Secgin, G. (2016). Functional diversity, absorptive capability and product success: The moderating role of project complexity in new product development teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(1), 90-109.
  2. Almeida, P., & Phene, A. (2004). Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8/9), 847-864.
  3. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634-665.
  4. Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.
  5. Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 875-893.
  6. Buyl, T., Boone, C., Hendriks, W., & Matthyssens, P. (2011). Top management team functional diversity and firm performance: the moderating role of CEO characteristics. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 151-177.
  7. Cannella, Jr., A. A., Park, J. H., & Lee, H. U. (2008). Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. The Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 768-784.
  8. Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749-778.
  9. Certo, S. T., Lester, R. H., Dalton, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2006). Top management teams, strategy and financial performance: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 813-839.
  10. Chahine, S., & Tohmé, N. S. (2009). Is CEO duality always negative? An exploration of CEO duality and ownership structure in the Arab IPO context. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(2), 123- 141. Chikh, S., & Filbien, J. (2011). Acquisitions and CEO power: Evidence from French networks. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(5), 1221-1236.
  11. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963).
  12. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 169-187.
  13. Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1-19.
  14. De Wit, D. C., Herbert, S. A. (1958). Selective perceptions: A note on the departmental identifications of ex