Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

A New Organizational Agility Assessment Approach Applied in the Logistics Industry

Pages
1129–1147
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is also concluded that companies need to be more agile as their operation size increases and they can meet these needs with managers who have an innovative perspective.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – Today, the variable and numerous demands from customers, changing market conditions and the depletion of resources have made agile working methods more necessary than in the past.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it is aimed to increase the awareness of the concept of agility in companies and to accelerate the agile transformation processes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is also concluded that companies need to be more agile as their operation size increases and they can meet these needs with managers who have an innovative perspective.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose – Today, the variable and numerous demands from customers, changing market conditions and the depletion of resources have made agile working methods more necessary than in the past. In this study, it is aimed to increase the awareness of the concept of agility in companies and to accelerate the agile transformation processes. Design/Methodology/Approach – In this research study, a new measurement scale is developed to assess the current agility levels of the companies operating in logistics sector. The new instrument measures the agility levels of seven business processes for eight components of agility and an aggregated level for company agility score is identified. The detailed questionnaire, which is composed of 51 questions, is applied to 4 companies operating in the logistics sector, differing in size and structure, and their current agility level is evaluated. The weights for business processes and agility component are also defined sector based via Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) during the calculation of the final agility score. Due to the detailed structure of the tool, the results gave opportunity for a detailed analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the business processes. Hence, custom recommendations could be made in order to improve the agility level of the company. Findings – It is seen that there are common elements like technology and innovation, that are highly effective on agility for every company studied, as well as there are prior elements to be focused that differ with the size and structure of the company. It is also concluded that companies need to be more agile as their operation size increases and they can meet these needs with managers who have an innovative perspective. Discussion – This study has developed its own methodology, its own research tool and recommendations, unlike previous studies in the field of agility. Aiming to bring a new link to the academic chain with these features, this project can shed light on more diverse studies in the field of agility.

🔖

Cite This Article

AK, M. M., GERGİN, Z., ÇOLAK, E., KAYALAR, M., YAVAŞOĞLU, C. D. (2022). A New Organizational Agility Assessment Approach Applied in the Logistics Industry. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 1129–1147. https://ajindex.com/articles/556238

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Al-Zabidi, A., Rehman, A. U. & Alkahtani, M. (2021). An approach to assess austainable supply chain agility for a manufacturing organization. Sustainability, 13(4), 1752. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13041752
  2. Azevedo, S., Cruz-Machado, V., Fazendeıro, P. & Prata, P. (2012). Assessment of supply chain agility in a cloud computing-based framework. Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience, 13(4), 295-301.
  3. Bahsani, S., Lakhdissi, M., Rdiouat, Y. & Semma, A. (2015). Measuring and improving information system agility through the balanced scorecard approach. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 12(5), 58-71.
  4. Baker, P. A., Callow, B., Gunsberg, D., Richardson, J., Ryan, B. & Suthers, J. (2018). Applying an organizational agility maturity model. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(6), 1315-1343.
  5. Benefield, R. (2010) Seven dimensions of agile maturity in the global enterprise: a case study. In 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2010), 5-8 Jan 2010,
  6. Koloa, Kauai, Hawaii, pp. 1–7.
  7. Boubaker, S., Dallery, Y., Jemaï, Z., & Sahin, E. (2019). Supply chain agility: Review of situations. In 8th International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems (ICORES 2019), 19-21 Feb 2019,
  8. Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 270-276.
  9. Brown, J.L. & Agnew, N.M. (1982) Corporate agility. Bus Horizons 25(2), 29–33. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/0007- 6813(82)90101-x Charles, A., Lauras, M. & Wassenhove, L. V. (2010). A model to define and assess the agility of supply chains: Building on humanitarian experience, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(8-9), 722-741.
  10. Erande, A. S. & Verma, A. K. (2008). Measuring agility of organizations – a comprehensive agility measurement tool (CAMT), International Journal of Applied Management and Technology, 6(3), 31-44
  11. Gartner (2006). Achieving agility: defining agility in an IT context, http//www.gartner.com/ doc/491393?ref=ddisp (accessed 31 July 2017).
  12. Geiger, J., Elshaw, J. & Jacques, D. (2020). Establishing the foundations to measure organizational agility for military organizations. Systems, 8(4), 44. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/systems8040044
  13. Glenn, M. (2009). Organizational agility: how business can survive and thrive in turbulent times. Economist Intelligence Unit Limited, London Gunasekaran, A. (1998). Agile manufacturing: Enablers and an implementation framework, International Journal of Production Re