Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Testing of Macroeconomic Factors Affecting Capital Markets with Granger Causality Method: Turkey Practice

Pages
1375–1387
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Addressing the long-term relationship between the BIST 100 index and gold prices in future studies will make an important contribution to the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose- In this study, the relationship between the capital market (BIST 100 index) and macroeconomic variables that are thought to affect the capital market (gold prices, oil prices, Euro-US Dollar exchange rate basket, budget balance, foreign trade balance) will be examined with the Granger causality method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Design/methodology/approach- The study covers the period of 2010-2019 on a monthly system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Addressing the long-term relationship between the BIST 100 index and gold prices in future studies will make an important contribution to the literature.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2010-2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose- In this study, the relationship between the capital market (BIST 100 index) and macroeconomic variables that are thought to affect the capital market (gold prices, oil prices, Euro-US Dollar exchange rate basket, budget balance, foreign trade balance) will be examined with the Granger causality method. Design/methodology/approach- The study covers the period of 2010-2019 on a monthly system. The data were obtained from the CBRT (EDDS) and TurkStat. Statistical package software (Stata and EViews 9) were used in the analysis of the data. BIST 100 index return is included in the model as a dependent variable and macroeconomic factors as an independent variable. The relationship between dependent and independent variables was examined with the VAR-based Granger causality method. Findings- As a result of the study, it has been understood that only the gold price among the macroeconomic factors is the Granger cause of the BIST 100 index. In other words, lagged changes in gold prices explain the variance of the BIST 100 index. When the direction of the relationship was examined, a one-way Granger causality was observed from the Ons variable to the BIST 100 variable. When the actionreaction shocks between the BIST 100 variable and the ONS variable are examined, a shock in gold prices affected the return of the BIST 100 index for about 2 months, and this effect decreased and disappeared from the 5th month. Again, approximately 6.82% of the variance of the BIST100 variable is explained by the Ons variable. Discussion- Developments in the capital markets are followed closely by both institutional investors and individual investors. For this reason, it is extremely important what factors affect the BIST 100 index, which is thought to represent the Turkish capital market. According to the findings of the study, changes in gold prices affect the BIST 100 index return, and the relationship between these two variables should be closely monitored. Addressing the long-term relationship between the BIST 100 index and gold prices in future studies will make an important contribution to the literature.

🔖

Cite This Article

KANTAR, L. (2022). Testing of Macroeconomic Factors Affecting Capital Markets with Granger Causality Method: Turkey Practice. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 1375–1387. https://ajindex.com/articles/556220

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akaike, H. (1974) A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-19(6), 716–23
  2. Akkum, T., and Vuran, B. (2005). Türk sermaye piyasasındaki hisse senedi getirilerini etkileyen makroekonomik faktörlerin Arbitraj Fiyatlama Modeli ile analizi. İktisat İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, 20(233), 28-45
  3. Aktaş, M. and Akdağ, S. (2013). Türkiye’de Ekonomik Faktörlerin Hisse Senedi Fiyatları ile İlişkisinin Araştırılması, International Journal Social Science Research, 2(2), 50-67
  4. Albayrak, A. S., Öztürk, N. and Tüylüoğlu, Ş. (2012), Makroekonomik Değişkenler ile Sermaye Hareketlerinin İMKB-100 Endeksi Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(8), 1-22
  5. Albeni, M. and Demir, Y. (2005). Makro Ekonomik Göstergelerin Mali Sektör Hisse Senedi Fiyatlarına Etkisi (İmkb Uygulamalı). Muğla Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi Bahar 2005(14), 1-18
  6. Al-Tamimi, H. A. H., Alwan, A. A. and Rahman, A. A. A. (2011). Factors Affecting Stock Prices in the UAE Financial Markets, Journal of Transnational Management, 16;3-19,
  7. Altınbaş, H. Kutay, N. and Akkaya, G. C. (2015). Makroekonomik Faktörlerin Hisse Senedi Piyasaları Üzerindeki Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir Uygulama, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 30-49
  8. Atıcı, S., Demir, N. ve Ural, M. (2019), Arbitraj Fiyatlama Modeli ile Türkiye’de Pay Getirelerini Etkileyen Makroekonomik Göstergelerin Analizi. Ekonomi, Politika&Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 106- 120 Badullahewage, U. S. (2018). The Effects of Macroeconomics Factors on the Performance of Stock Market in Sri Lanka, International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, 3(6), 33-41
  9. Cihangir, M., and Kandemir, T. (2010). Finansal kriz dönemlerinde hisse senetleri getirilerini etkileyen makroekonomik faktörlerin Arbitraj Fiyatlandırma Modeli aracılığıyla saptanmasına yönelik bir çalışma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 257-296. Erişim adresi: http://iibfdergi.sdu.edu.tr/
  10. Çetin, C. A. and Bıtırak, A. İ. (2015), Türkiye Ekonomisinde Makro Ekonomik Değişkenlerin Hisse Senedi Getirilerine Etkisi: Arbitraj Fiyatlama Modeli Ekseninde Bir Analiz. 10(16), 1-19
  11. Demir, Y. and Yağcılar, G. G. (2009). İmkb’de İşlem Gören Banka Hisse Senetlerinin Getirilerini Etkileyen Faktörlerin Arbitraj Fiyatlama Modeliyle Belirlenmesi, Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 1(2) 36-51
  12. Diacogiannis, G. P. and Tsiritakis, D. E. (2001). Macroeconomic Factors and Stock Retur