Journals / Cukurova Medical Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2

Determination of breast, prostate, colorectal and lung cancer environmental risk factors and risk levels: case-control study

Meme, prostat, kolorektal ve akciğer kanserlerinde çevresel risk faktörleri ve risk düzeylerinin belirlenmesi: olgu-kontrol çalışması

Pages
411–421
Publication Date
2018-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The inability to detect significant difference in the cancer risk levels of case and control groups may be due to the small number of cases, or the risk calculation programs not being appropriate for the Turkish population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess environmental risk factors affecting breast, prostate, colorectal and lung cancer and to assess risk levels before diagnosis using risk level determination programs.Materials and Methods: This research was done in Izmir Province Balcova district, a case-control type.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A case group of patients with lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer was established between 2008 and 2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The inability to detect significant difference in the cancer risk levels of case and control groups may be due to the small number of cases, or the risk calculation programs not being appropriate for the Turkish population.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:meme kanseri · risk faktörü · prostat kanseri

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess environmental risk factors affecting breast, prostate, colorectal and lung cancer and to assess risk levels before diagnosis using risk level determination programs.Materials and Methods: This research was done in Izmir Province Balcova district, a case-control type. A case group of patients with lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer was established between 2008 and 2013. The sociodemographic and individual characteristics, lifestyle and eating habits of participants were collected with a questionnaire. Cancer risk level of case and control groups was calculated. There were 57 breast, 52 prostate, 22 colorectal and 42 lung cancer cases in the case group. Breast cases were compared with 216 female controls. Prostate cancer cases were compared with 211 male controls. Colorectal and lung cancer cases were compared with 427 female and male controls.Results: Breast cancer risk was 2.36 times higher in those under the age of sixty. Breast cancer was found to be lower in overweight or obese groups. Lung cancer was 2,04 times higher in males, 4,10 times higher in current smokers and 2,19 times higher in ex-smokers. Conclusion: Relationship between breast cancer and age and body mass index; colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease; male, smoking and lung cancer was found. The inability to detect significant difference in the cancer risk levels of case and control groups may be due to the small number of cases, or the risk calculation programs not being appropriate for the Turkish population.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı meme, prostat, kolorektal ve akciğer kanserini etkileyen çevresel risk faktörlerini belirlemek ve risk düzeyi belirleme programları kullanılarak tanı konmadan önceki risk düzeylerini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma İzmir’in Balçova ilçesinde yapılan olgu-kontrol araştırmasıdır. 2008-2013 yılları arasında akciğer, meme, kolorektal ve prostat kanseri tanısı alanlar araştırmanın olgu grubunu oluşturmuştur. Katılımcıların sosyodemografik özellikleri, yaşam tarzı ve beslenme alışkanlıkları anketle belirlenmiştir. Olgu ve kontrol gruplarının kanser risk düzeyleri hesaplanmıştır. Olgu grubunda 57 meme, 52 prostat, 22 kolorektal ve 42 akciğer kanseri olgusu bulunmaktadır. Meme kanseri olguları 216 kadın, prostat kanseri olguları 211 erkek, kolorektal ve akciğer kanseri olguları ise 427 kadın ve erkek kontrol ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Altmış yaşın altında olanlarda meme kanseri 2.36 kat fazladır. Fazla kilolu ya da şişman gruplarında meme kanseri daha az görülmüştür. Akciğer kanseri erkeklerde 2.04 kat, sigara içenlerde 4.10 kat, sigarayı bırakanlarda 2.19 kat fazladır. Sonuç: Yaş ve beden kütle indeksiyle meme kanseri; inflamatuar bağırsak hastalığıyla kolorektal kanserler; erkek cinsiyeti ve sigara içmeyle akciğer kanseri arasında ilişki bulunmuştur. Olgu ve kontrol grupları arasında hesaplanan kanser risk düzeyleri bakımından anlamlı fark saptanamaması olgu sayılarının az olmasından ya da kullanılan risk hesaplama programlarının Türk toplumuna uygun olmamasından kaynaklanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Açıkgöz, A., Çımrın, D., Ergör, G. (2018). Determination of breast, prostate, colorectal and lung cancer environmental risk factors and risk levels: case-control study. Cukurova Medical Journal, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2, 411–421. https://ajindex.com/articles/55615

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. World Health Organization. Cancer. http://www.who.int/topics/cancer/en/ (Erişim tarihi: 04.10.2017)
  2. Sağlık Bakanlığı Halk Sağlığı Kurumu. Türkiye Kanser istatistikleri. Ankara, Sağlık Bakanlığı, 2016
  3. International Agency for Research on Cancer. CI5 X: Cancer Incidence in Five Continents Volume X. Online Analysis. http://ci5.iarc.fr/CI5-X/Pages/summary_table_site_sel.aspx (Erişim tarihi: 10.09.2017)
  4. International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012. http://globocan.iarc.fr/ (Erişim tarihi: 20.09.2017)
  5. Harvard School of Public Health. Disease risk index cancer. http://www.diseaseriskindex.harvard.edu/update/hccpquiz.pl?lang=english&func=show&quiz=breast&page=risk_list (Erişim tarihi: 30.08.2017)
  6. National Cancer Institute. Breast cancer risk factors. http://www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool/breast-cancer-risk.aspx (Erişim tarihi: 20.09.2017)
  7. Stratton S, Ahmann F. Prostate cancer prevention. In Fundamentals of Cancer Prevention (Eds DS Alberts, LM Hess):277-314. Berlin, Springer, 2005
  8. National Cancer Institute. Risk Factors for Prostate Cancer Development. http://www.cancer.gov/types/prostate/hp/prostate-prevention-pdq#section/_17 (Erişim tarihi: 20.09.2017)
  9. Giovannucci E. Epidemiology of vitamin D and colorectal cancer. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2013;13:11-19
  10. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Types, Lung cancer. http://www.cancer.gov/types/lung/hp (Erişim tarihi: 10.10.2017)
  11. Kakino K, Kiyohara C, Horiuchi T, Nakanishi Y. CYP2E1 rs2031920, COMT rs4680 polymorphisms, cigarette smoking, alcohol use and lung cancer risk in a Japanese population. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17:4063-70
  12. Wong JYY, Bassig BA, Seow WJ, Hu W, Ji BT, Blair A et al. Lung cancer risk in welders and foundry workers with a history of heavy smoking in the USA:The National Lung Screening Trial. Occup Environ Med. 2017;74:440–8
  13. Dinçel C, Başak F, Pektaş B, Kınacı E. Eğitim seviyesi düşük kadınların meme kanseri bilgi düzeyi ve risk hesaplaması. Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi. 2014;25:181-6
  14. Schonberg MA, Li VW, Eliassen AH, Davis RB, La Croix AZ, Mc Carthy EP et al. Performance of the breast cancer risk assessment tool among women aged 75 years and older. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108:doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv348
  15. Thompson PA, Lopez AM, Stopeck A. Breast cancer prevention. In Fundamentals of Cancer Prevention (Eds DS Alberts, LM Hess):255