SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstatistik. Türk İstatistik Derneği Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

SOME IMPROVED CLASSIFICATION-BASED RIDGE PARAMETER OF HOERL AND KENNARD ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES

Adewale F. LUKMAN
Kayode AYİNDE
Pages
17–30
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show that the improved ridge parameters proposed in this study are better than the existing ones most especially with the quantity "+"" Finally, results from the real life data support the simulation results to some extent.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:: In linear regression model, it is often assumed that the explanatory variables are independent.This assumption is often violated and Ridge Regression estimator introduced by Hoerl and Kennard (1970) has been identified to be more efficient than ordinary least square (OLS) in handling it.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Investigation were done by conducting 1000 Monte-Carlo experiments under five (5) levels of multicollinearity, three (3) levels of error variance and five levels of sample size.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results show that the improved ridge parameters proposed in this study are better than the existing ones most especially with the quantity "+"" Finally, results from the real life data support the simulation results to some extent.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

: In linear regression model, it is often assumed that the explanatory variables are independent.This assumption is often violated and Ridge Regression estimator introduced by Hoerl and Kennard (1970) has been identified to be more efficient than ordinary least square (OLS) in handling it. However, it requires ridge parameter, K, of which many have been proposed. In this study, estimators based on Hoerl and Kennard were classified into different forms and various types and some modifications were proposed toimprove it. Investigation were done by conducting 1000 Monte-Carlo experiments under five (5) levels of multicollinearity, three (3) levels of error variance and five levels of sample size. For the purpose of comparing the performance of the improved ridge parameter with the existing ones, the number of times the MSE of the improved ridge parameter is less than the existing ones is counted over the levels of multicollinearity (5)and error variance (3). Also, maximum of fifteen (15) counts is expected. Results show that the improved ridge parameters proposed in this study are better than the existing ones most especially with the quantity "+"" Finally, results from the real life data support the simulation results to some extent.

🔖

Cite This Article

LUKMAN, A. F., AYİNDE, K. (2022). SOME IMPROVED CLASSIFICATION-BASED RIDGE PARAMETER OF HOERL AND KENNARD ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES. İstatistik. Türk İstatistik Derneği Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 17–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/555719

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Al-Odat, M.T. and Al-Saleh, M.F. (2001). variation of ranked set sampling. Journal of Applied Statistical Science, 10(2), 137--146
  2. Al--Omari, A.I. (2012). Ratio estimation of the population mean using auxiliary information in simple random sampling and median ranked set sampling. Statistics Probability Letters, 82(11), 1883--1890
  3. Arnold, B.C., Balakrishnan, N., and Nagaraja, H.N. (2008). First Course in Order Statistics. SIAM, New York
  4. Bickel, P.J. (1967). Some contributions to the theory of order statistics. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Statistics [5] Chen, W., Xie, M., and Wu, M. (2013). Parametric estimation for the scale parameter for scale distributions using moving extremes ranked set sampling. Statistics Probability Letters, 83(9), 2060--2066
  5. David, H.A and Nagaraja, H.N. (2003). Order Statistics. Wiley, New York
  6. Hussein, A., Muttlak, H.A. and Saleh, M. (2013). Group sequential comparison of two binomial proportions under ranked set sampling design. Computational Statistics, 28(3), 1169--1194
  7. Kadilar, C., Unyazici, Y., and Cingi, H. (2009). Ratio estimator for the population mean using ranked set sampling. Statistical Papers, 50(2), 301--309
  8. McIntyre, G.A. (1952). method for unbiased selective sampling, using ranked sets. Crop and Pasture Science, 3(4), 385--390
  9. Muttlak, H.A. (1997). Median ranked set sampling. Journal of Applied Statistical Sciences, 6(4), 245-- 255
  10. Nahhas, R.W., Wolfe, D.A. and Chen, H. (2002). Ranked set sampling: cost and optimal set size. Biometrics, 58(4), 964--971
  11. Salehi, M., Ahmadi7 J. and Balakrishnan, N. (2015). Prediction of order statistics and record values based on ordered ranked set sampling. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 85(1), 77--85
  12. Samawi, H.M., Ahmed, M.S., and Abu--Dayyeh, W. (1996). Estimating the population mean using extreme ranked set sampling. Biometrical Journal, 38(5), 577--586
  13. Samawi, H.M. and Muttlak, H.A. (1996). Estimation of ratio using rank set sampling. Biometrical Journal, 38(6), 753--764
  14. Samawi, H.M. and Al-Sagheer7 O.A.M. (2001). On the estimation of the distribution function using extreme and median ranked set sampling. Biometrical Journal, 43(3), 357--373
  15. Singh, H.P., Tailor, R., and Singh7 S. (2014). General procedure for estimating the population mean using ranked set sampling. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulat