Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 2

Effects of lysozyme and nisin on growth and biofilm formation of foodborne staphylococcus aureus strains

Lizozim ve nisinin gıda kaynaklı staphylococcus aureus suşlarında gelişim ve biyofilm oluşumu üzerine etkileri

Pages
254–263
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conversely, high concentrations of nisin had an inhibitory effect on bacterial growth, whereas the presence of nisin resistant S. aureus strains could exist.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most important pathogenic bacteria in food producing toxins and causing food poisoning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the effects of biopreservatives lysozyme and nisin on growth and biofilm formation of S. aureus strains (n=14) isolated from different foods were examined by quantitative microplate method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conversely, high concentrations of nisin had an inhibitory effect on bacterial growth, whereas the presence of nisin resistant S. aureus strains could exist.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most important pathogenic bacteria in food producing toxins and causing food poisoning. In this study, the effects of biopreservatives lysozyme and nisin on growth and biofilm formation of S. aureus strains (n=14) isolated from different foods were examined by quantitative microplate method. On the basis of obtained data, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mg/ml of lysozyme concentrations did not inhibit the growth of strains and all strains were determined as resistant to lysozyme. On the other hand, nisin at 12,5 mg/ml concentration showed 100% inhibition on most of the strains, except S. aureus SE - 22C strain at 37,5 mg nisin/ml concentration, the growth of strain was obtained after a long incubation time. As a result of biofilm tests, in four strains increasing concentrations of lysozyme were found to activate biofilm formation. In SE-22C strain, with compared to medium wit hout lysozyme, firstly biofilm formation was decreased then with increasing lysozyme concentrations the increased biofilm formationwas obtained. In addition, in two strains biofilm formation was decreased with increased lysozyme concentrations. Nisin reduced biofilm formation of four strains with increasing concentrations, but there was no effect of nisin on biofilm formation of the other strains. As a result of this study, lysozyme was determined as an ineffective biopreservative against S. aureus strains, but it can activate biofilm formation of the strains. Conversely, high concentrations of nisin had an inhibitory effect on bacterial growth, whereas the presence of nisin resistant S. aureus strains could exist.

Özet

Staphylococcus aureus gıdalarda gelişebilen ve ürettiği toksinlerle gıda zehirlenmesine yol açan en önemli patojen bakterilerdendir. Bu çalışmada, besin maddelerinde sıklıkla biyokoruyucu olarak kullanılan lizozim ve nisinin, değişik gıdalardan izole edilen 14 adet S. aureus suşunun gelişme ve biyofilm oluşturması üzerindeki etkileri kantitatif mikroplaka yöntemi ile araştırılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler doğrultusunda 1, 2, 3, 4 ve 5 mg/ml konsantrasyonlardaki lizozimin, bakteri gelişmesini engelleme yönünde hiçbir etkisinin olmadığı ve tüm suşların lizozime karşı dirençli oldukları tespit edilmiştir. Diğer yandan, 12,5 μg/ml konsantrasyonda nisinin bazı suşlarda % 100 inhibisyon gösterdiği saptanmış, sadece bir suşta ise (S. aureus SE-22C) 37,5 μg/ml konsantrasyonda uzun inkübasyon sonrasında gelişme görülmüştür. Biyofilm testleri sonucunda, lizozimin artan konsantrasyonlarının dört suşta biyofilm yapımını aktive ettiği, bir suşta ise lizozim içermeyen besiyerine göre önce azalttığı, artan lizozim konsantrasyonlarında ise biyofilm oluşumunu arttırdığı tespit edilmiştir. Diğer yandan lizozimin artan konsantrasyonlarının iki suşta biyofilm oluşumunu azalttığı görülmüştür. Nisinin artan konsantrasyonlarının dört suşta bakterilerin biyofilm oluşumunu azalttığı, diğer suşlarda ise bir değişikliğe yol açmadığı bulunmuştur. Çalışmamız neticesinde lizozimin S. aureus suşlarına karşı etkisiz bir biyokoruyucu olduğu, fakat biyofilm yapımını aktive edebildiği; buna karşın nisinin yüksek konsantrasyonlarda bakteri gelişmesi üzerine inhibisyon etkisinin olduğu, ancak nisine dirençli S. aureus suşlarının bulunabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, A., SUDAĞIDAN, M. (2022). Effects of lysozyme and nisin on growth and biofilm formation of foodborne staphylococcus aureus strains. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 2, 254–263. https://ajindex.com/articles/555171

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akkoç, N., Şanlıbaba, P., Akçelik, M., 2009. Bakteriyosinler: Alternatif gıda koruyucuları. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 25, 59-70.
  2. Aydin, A., Muratoglu, K., Sudagidan, M., Bostan, K., Okuklu, B., Harsa, S., 2011. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of foodborne Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Turkey. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 8, 63-69.
  3. Bera, A., Herbert, S., Jakob, A., Vollmer, W., Götz, F., 2005. Why are pathogenic staphylococci so lysozyme resistant? The peptidoglycan Oacetyltransferase OatA is the major determinant for lysozyme resistance of Staphylococcus aureus. Molecular Microbiology 55, 778-787.
  4. Blake, K.L., Randall, C.P., O’Neill, A.J., 2011. In vitro studies indicate a high resistance potential for the lantibiotic nisin in Staphylococcus aureus and define a genetic basis for nisin resistance. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 55, 2362-2368.
  5. Carlson, S., Bauer, H.M., 1957. Nisin, ein antibakterieller wirkstoff aus Streptococcus lactis unter berucksichtigung des resistenz problems. Archiv für Hygiene und Bakteriologie 141, 445-459.
  6. Chen, H., Hoover, D.G., 2003. Bacteriocins and their food applications. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2, 82-100.
  7. Cotter, P.D., Hill, C., Ross, R.P., 2005. Bacteriocins: developing innate immunity for food. Nature Reviews Microbiology 3, 777-788.
  8. Davidson, P.M., Harrison, M.A., 2002. Resistance and application to food antimicrobials, sanitizers, and other process controls. Food Technology 56, 69-78.
  9. Davidson, P.M., Juneja, V.K., Branen, J.K., 2002. Antimicrobial Agents. In: Branen, A.L., Davidson, P.M., Salminen, S. and Thorngate J.H. (Eds). Food Additives. Marcel Dekker, New York. Donlan, R.M., 2001. Biofilms and device associated infections. Emerging Infectious Disease 7, 277- 281. Fedtke, I., Götz, F., Peschel, A., 2004. Bacterial evasion of innate host defenses-the Staphylococcus aureus lesson. International Journal of Medical Microbiology 294, 189-194.
  10. Gill, A.O., Holley, R.A., 2000. Inhibition of bacterial growth on ham and bologna by lysozyme, nisin and EDTA. Food Research International 33, 83- 90. Grade, S., Avila, M., Nunez, M., 2004. Fast induction of nisin resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus INIA 463 during growth in milk. International Journal of Food Microbiology 96, 165-172.
  11. Harris, L.J., Fleming, H.P., Klaenhammer, T.R., 1991. Sensitivity and resistance of Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 19115, Scott A and UAL500 to nisin. Journal of Food Protect