Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of different techniques of teat ultrasonography in goats

Keçilerde değişik meme başı ultrasonografi tekniklerinin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
33–39
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The “direct contact” and “stand off” techniques allowed the visualization of the proximal teat part, but the structures in the distal part of the teat were hardly visible (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of ultrasonography for visualization of teats in goats using different techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thirty clinically healthy Bulgarian Dairy White goats, aged 3-7 years, weighing 45-60 kg were studied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The “direct contact” and “stand off” techniques allowed the visualization of the proximal teat part, but the structures in the distal part of the teat were hardly visible (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of ultrasonography for visualization of teats in goats using different techniques. Thirty clinically healthy Bulgarian Dairy White goats, aged 3-7 years, weighing 45-60 kg were studied. They were between the first and third months of lactation and were reared under an identical production system. The ultrasonography of 60 teats was performed by means of diagnostic ultrasound Mindray DP-2200Vet (Mindray, China) and 5, 7.5 and 10 МHz probes. Each teat was scanned by the “direct contact”, “stand off” and “water bath” techniques. The possibility of visualization of teat orifice, teat canal, rosette of Furstenberg, teat wall, teat cistern and the boundary between teat and gland cisterns was investigated. The results were processed by statistical software (StatSoft, Microsoft Corp. 1984-2000 Inc.). The “direct contact” and “stand off” techniques allowed the visualization of the proximal teat part, but the structures in the distal part of the teat were hardly visible (P

Özet

Bu çalışma, değişik metotlar kullanarak keçilerde meme başının ultrasonografik görüntülenme potansiyelinin ortaya konulması amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Yaşları 3-7 arasında, 45-60 kg ağırlığında 30 adet klinikman sağlıklı Bulgar Beyaz keçisi çalışma kapsamında değerlendirildi. Keçiler laktasyonun birinci ve üçüncü ayları arasındaydılar ve benzer üretim sistemleri altında yetiştirilmekteydiler. 60 meme başı ultrasonografisi Mindray DP-2200Vet (Mindray, Çin) cihazı ile ve 5, 7,5 ve 10 MHz propları kullanılarak uygulandı. Her meme başı ‘direkt temas’, ‘su yastığı’ ve ‘su banyosu’ teknikleri ile incelenmiştir. Çalışmada, meme başı deliği, meme başı kanalı, Furstenberg rozeti, meme başı duvarı, meme başı sisterni ve meme başı ile bez sisternleri arasındaki sınırlar incelenmiştir. Sonuçlar istatistiki yazılımlar (StatSoft, Microsoft Corp. 1984-2000 Inc.) kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. ‘Direkt temas’ ve ‘su yastığı’ teknikleri meme başının proksimal kısmının görüntülenmesini sağlamış, fakat meme başının distal bölgeleri zorlukla görüntülenebilmiştir (P

🔖

Cite This Article

YOTOV, S., FASULKOV, I., ATANASOV, A., ANTONOV, A. (2022). Evaluation of different techniques of teat ultrasonography in goats. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1, 33–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/555150

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ayadi, M., Caja, G., Such, X., Knight, C.H., 2003. Use of ultrasonography to estimate cistern size and milk storage at different milking intervals in the udder of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 70, 1-7.
  2. Cartee, R.E., Ibrahim, A.K., McLeary, D., 1986. B-mode ultrasonography of the bovine udder and teat. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 188 (11), 1284-1287.
  3. Couture, Y., Mulon, P.Y., 2005. Procedures and surgery of the teat. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 21 (1), 173-204.
  4. Dinç, D.A., Şendağ, S., Aydin, I., 2000. Diagnosis of teat stenosis in dairy cattle by real-time ultrasonography. Veterinary Record 147 (10), 270-272.
  5. Flöck, M., Winter, P., 2006. Diagnostic ultrasonography in cattle with disease of the mammary gland. The Veterinary Journal 171 (2), 314-321.
  6. Flöck, M., Klein, D., Hofman-Parisot, M., 2004. Diagnostic ultrasonography in cattle with teat disorders. Wiener Tierärztliche Monatsschrift 91, 184-195.
  7. Franz, S., Floek, M., Hofmann-Parisot, M., 2009. Ultrasonography of the bovine udder and teat. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 25 (3), 669-685.
  8. Franz, S., Hofmann-Parisot, M., Gütler, S., Baumgartner, W., 2003. Clinical and ultrasonographic findings in the mammary gland of sheep. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 51 (5), 238-243.
  9. Franz, S., Hofmann-Parisot, M., Baumgartner, W., Windischbauer, G., Suchy, A., Bauder, B., 2001. Ultrasonography of the teat canal in cows and sheep. Veterinary Record 149 (4), 109-112.
  10. Gleeson, D.E., O'Callaghan, Е., 1998. The effect of machine milking on teat tissue reaction using ultrasonic analysis. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council Inc, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 254-255.
  11. Gleeson, D.E., O’Callaghan, E.J., Rath, M.V., 2002. Effect of milking on bovine teat tissue as measured by ultrasonography. Irish Veterinary Journal 55 (12), 628-632.
  12. Gonzalez de Bulnes, A., Garcia Fernandez, P., Mayenco Aquirre, A.M., Sanchez de la Muela, M., 1998. Ultrasonographic imaging of canine mammary tumours. Veterinary Record 143 (25), 687-689.
  13. Gufler, H., Franz, S., Baumgartner, W., 1998. Ultraschalldiagnostik beim Wiederkauer. In: Proceedings of the 10th Middle European Buiatrics Congress, Siofok, Hungary, 239-241.
  14. Hiepler, T., Schönfelder, A., Wehrend, A., 2009. Sonographische Untersuchung des ovinen Euters. Tierärztliche Praxis Großtiere 37 (3), 157-163.
  15. Hospes, R., Seeh, C., 1999. Sonography. In: Hospes, R., Seeh, C. (Eds),