Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 34

The Approach of Basic Human Needs Ethics in Development Economics

Kalkınma İktisadında Temel İhtiyaçlar Etiği Yaklaşımı

Pages
123–135
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this paper, it is aimed to point out the importance of the “basic human needs ethics” approach in explaining human needs and development process by discussing it with reference to some philosophical traditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:From 1970’s, many international institutions, politicians and academicians have been arguing that the central purpose of development economics should be making policy recommendations concerning the way in which the basic needs can be satisfied.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While there is an agreement on the universality of this purpose of development economics on the one hand, there does not appear to be an agreement on the definition of basic human needs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this paper, it is aimed to point out the importance of the “basic human needs ethics” approach in explaining human needs and development process by discussing it with reference to some philosophical traditions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

From 1970’s, many international institutions, politicians and academicians have been arguing that the central purpose of development economics should be making policy recommendations concerning the way in which the basic needs can be satisfied. While there is an agreement on the universality of this purpose of development economics on the one hand, there does not appear to be an agreement on the definition of basic human needs. In this paper, it is aimed to point out the importance of the “basic human needs ethics” approach in explaining human needs and development process by discussing it with reference to some philosophical traditions.

Özet

1970'li yıllardan itibaren pek çok uluslararası kuruluş, politikacı ve akademisyen, kalkınma iktisadının asıl amacının temel insan ihtiyaçlarının nasıl giderileceğine ilişkin politika önerilerinde bulunmak olduğunu öne sürmüşlerdir. Bu amacın evrenselliği konusunda bir uzlaşma söz konusu olsa da, temel insan ihtiyaçlarının tanım ve kapsamı konusunda görüş birliği doğmamıştır. Ancak, 1990’lı yıllardan itibaren temel ihtiyaçlar etiği yaklaşımı altında, pek çok sosyal bilimci, yerel farklılıkları da gözeterek temel insan ihtiyaçlarının genelliğini ve evrenselliğini ortaya koymuşlar ve temel insan ihtiyaçlarını çeşitli felsefi gelenekler çerçevesinde yeniden tanımlamışlardır. Çalışmamızda, temel ihtiyaçlar etiği yaklaşımının incelenmesi ve bu yaklaşımın kalkınma sürecindeki öneminin ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAÇAY, H. Ç. (2022). The Approach of Basic Human Needs Ethics in Development Economics. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 34, 123–135. https://ajindex.com/articles/554867

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Benhabib, S. (1995), "Cultural Complexity, Moral Interdependence, and the Global Dialogical Community", M.Nussbaum ve J.Glover (der)., Woman, Culture and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities içinde. Clarendon Press, Oxford: 234-255 •Bulutay, T. (2002), In the Context of Strengtheneign the Capacity in National Accounts Project Implemented together with UNDP and SIS: The New Developments in National Accounts, DİE Yayınlan: Ankara •Cohen, G.A. (1993), "Equality of What? On Welfare Goods and Capabilities" M.Nussbaum ve A. Sen, The Quality of Life içinde. Clarendon Press, Oxford: 2-29. •Crocker. D. (1991), "Towards Development Ethics", World Development, 19, 457-83. •Crocker, D. (1992), "Functionings and Capability: The Foundations of Sen's and Nussbaum's Development Ethic", Political Theory, 20, 584-612. •Çakmak-Karaçay, H. (2003), "Kalkınma İktisadı Literatüründe Gelişme Kavramının Evrimi", Hacettepe Üniversitesi, İİBF Dergisi, 21(2), 49-68 •Elwan, A. (1999), "Poverty and Disability: A Survey of Literature", Social Protection Discussion Paper, No:9932, World Bank: Washington, DC. •Ercan, F. (2001),
  2. Modernimi, Kapitalizm ve Azgelişmişlik, Bağlam Yayınlan: istanbul •Erikson, R. (1993), "Descriptions of Inequality: The Swedish Approaches to Welfare Research", M.Nussbaum ve A. Sen, The Quality of Life içinde. Clarendon Press, Oxford: 67-84. •Gaertner, W. (1993), "Amarta Sen: Capability and Well-Being" M.Nussbaum ve A. Sen, The Quality of Life içinde. Clarendon Press, Oxford: 62-66. •Gasper, D. (1996), "Culture and Development Ethics: Needs, Women's Rights, and Western Theories", Development and Change, 27(4): 627-661. •Glover, J. (1995), " The Research Programme of Development Ethics", Nussbaum, M. ve J. Glover (der"), Woman, Culture and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities içinde, Clarendon Press, Oxford: 116-139. •Goldia, I. ve L.A Winters (1995), "Economic Policies for Sustainable Development", Goldin I ve L.A. Winters (der). The Economics of Sustainable Developmentiçinde. Canbridge University Press, Cambridge: 1-15. •Gökberk, M. (1994),
  3. Felsefe Tarihi, Remzi Kitabevi: İstanbul •Ingham, B. (1993), "The Meaning of Development: Interactions Between "New" and "Old" Ideas", World Development, 21: 1802-1821. •Korsgaard, CM. (1993), " G.A Cohen: Equality of What? A.Sen: Capability and Well-Being", M.Nussbaum ve A.Sen, The Quality of Life içinde. Clarendon Press, Oxford: 54-61. •Kuçuradi, I. (1988), Uludağ Konuşmaları: Özgürlük, Ahlak ve Kültür Kavramla