SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası / 2015 / Cilt: 73 - Sayı: 1

(THE PROBLEM OF UNKNOWN JUSTIFICATION IN CRIMINAL LAW)

Ali Emrah BOZBAYINDIR
Selman DURSUN
Pages
63–90
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is the objective of this article to sum up views, historical background and try to resolve this newly emerging issue in Turkish Criminal Law.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Unknown justification is one of the most contested themes in criminal law dogmatic and there is a wide range of views on this issue.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the objective conception of justifications there is no place for a subjective intent and/or knowledge element, which is still the prevailing view in the Turkish Criminal Law.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is the objective of this article to sum up views, historical background and try to resolve this newly emerging issue in Turkish Criminal Law.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Unknown justification is one of the most contested themes in criminal law dogmatic and there is a wide range of views on this issue. According to the objective conception of justifications there is no place for a subjective intent and/or knowledge element, which is still the prevailing view in the Turkish Criminal Law. Yet, with the introduction of the new Penal Code there is a newly, under the German influence emerging theory of subjective elements of justification, makes the existence of a subjective element a necessary component for justifying reasons for otherwise criminal conduct. There exists, however, a lack of clarity concerning the legal consequences of this new theory. It is the objective of this article to sum up views, historical background and try to resolve this newly emerging issue in Turkish Criminal Law.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZBAYINDIR, A. E., DURSUN, S. (2022). (THE PROBLEM OF UNKNOWN JUSTIFICATION IN CRIMINAL LAW). İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, Cilt: 73 - Sayı: 1, 63–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/553271

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Artuk, Mehmet Emin/Gökcen, Ahmet/Yenidünya, A. Caner, Ceza Hukuku: Genel Hükümler, 8. Baskı, 2014.
  2. Aygörmez, Gülsün Ayhan, Hukuki Kurum Rızanın, Tıp Ceza Hukukunda Geçerli Olarak Kurulması, Yeditepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2009, 135-171.
  3. Baumann, Jürgen/Weber, Ulrich/Mitsch, Wolfgang, Strafrecht: Allgemeiner Teil, 11. Auflage, 2003.
  4. BGH, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (=NJW), 2013, 2135. Demirbaş, Timur, Ceza Hukuku: Genel Hükümler, 10. Baskı, 2014.
  5. Centel, Nur/Zafer, Hamide/Çakmut, Özlem, Türk Ceza Hukukuna Giriş, 8. Bası, 2014.
  6. Değirmenci, Olgun, Ceza Hukukunda Yanılma Kavramı ve Hukuka Uygunluk Nedenlerinde Yanılma, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, 2014/110, 129-188.
  7. Dönmezer, Sulhi/Erman, Sahir, Nazarî ve Tatbikî Ceza Hukuku: Genel Kısım, Cilt: II, 10. Bası, 1994.
  8. Ekici Şahin, Meral, Ceza Hukukunda Rıza, 2012.
  9. Erem, Faruk/Danışman, Ahmet/Artuk Mehmet Emin, Ümanist Doktrin Açısından Türk Ceza Hukuku: Genel Hükümler, 14. Baskı, 1997.
  10. Erman, Ragıp Barış, Yanılmanın Ceza Sorumluluğuna Etkisi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, 2006.
  11. Ersan, Aykut, Ceza Hukukunda Meşru Savunma ve Meşru Savunmada Sınırın Aşılması, 2013.
  12. Fahl, Christian, Unter Brüdern, Juristische Ausbildung, 2003, 60. Fischer, Thomas, Strafgesetzbuch mit Nebengesetze, 61. Auflage, 2014.
  13. Frisch, Wolfgang, Grund- und Grenzprobleme des sog. subjektiven Rechtfertigungselements, Festschrift für Karl Lackner zum 70 Geburtstag, Wilfried Küper, 1987, 113-148.
  14. Frister, Helmut, Strafrecht: Allgemeiner Teil, 6. Auflage, 2013.
  15. Fuchs, Helmut, Strafrecht: Allgemeiner Teil I, Grundlagen und Lehre von der Straftat, 8. Auflage, 2012.
  16. Geppert, Klaus, Die subjektiven Rechtfertigungselemente, Juristische Ausbildung, 1995, 103-107.
  17. Göktürk, Neslihan, Hukuka Uygunluk Nedenlerinin Maddi Koşullarında Yanılgının Hukuki Niteliği, Ceza Hukuku Dergisi, Aralık 2014, 7-30.
  18. Gropp, Walter, An der Grenze der Lehre vom personalen Unrecht- Eine Skizze zum Fehlen des subjektiven Rechtfertigungselements, Festschrift für Kristian Kühl zum 70. Geburtstag, Hrsg. Martin Heger, Brigitte Kelker, Edward Schramm, 2014, 247-258.
  19. Gropp, Walter, Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 3. Auflage, 2005 (Lehrbuch=LB3). Gropp, Walter, Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 4. Auflage, 2015 (Lehrbuch=LB). Güngör, Devrim, Ceza Hukukunda Fiil Üzerinde Hata, 2007.
  20. Hafızoğulları, Zeki/Özen, Muharrem, Türk Ceza Hukuku: Genel Hükümler, 5. Baskı, 2012.
  21. Hakeri, Hakan, Ceza Hukuku: Genel Hükümler, 17. Baskı, 2014.
  22. Hartl, Benedikt, Das nationalsozialistische Willenss