SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3

A comparison of a chlorhexidine dentfrice with a conventional dentfrice: A 16-day clinical trial

Klorheksidin içeren bir diş macununun anti-plak ajan içermeyen bir diş macunu ile karşılaştırılması: 16 günlük klinik çalışma

Cenker Zeki KOYUNCUOĞLU
Emine ÇİFCİBAŞI
Serdar ÇİNTAN
Mustafa AMUCKA
Pages
41–49
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Test paste caused an increased amount of staining (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: A test dentifrice with chlorhexidine digluconate compared with the control dentifrice and their anti-plaque and anti-gingivitis effects were examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: 20 volunteer periodontally and systemically healthy dental students were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Test paste caused an increased amount of staining (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: A test dentifrice with chlorhexidine digluconate compared with the control dentifrice and their anti-plaque and anti-gingivitis effects were examined. Material and Methods: 20 volunteer periodontally and systemically healthy dental students were included. Plaque index, gingival index, and tooth staining index were measured at baseline and 16 days. Volunteers brushed 1. and 3. quadrants with the test paste and 2. and 4. segments with the control paste using Modified Bass technique for 16 days. Results: There was significantly more plaque accumulation in the control group demonstrating CHX to be more efficient to prevent plaque accumulation (p0.05), however there was an increase in the control toothpaste group at 16 day compared to baseline. Test paste caused an increased amount of staining (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada klorheksidin (CHX) diglukonat içeren test macununu kontrol macunu ile karşılaştırılarak anti-plak ve anti-gingivitis etkinliğinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Sistemik ve periodontal sağlıklı olan 20 gönüllü diş hekimliği öğrencisi dâhil edilmiştir. Gönüllülere diş yüzeyi temizliği yapıldıktan sonra başlangıç indeksleri (plak indeksi, gingival indeks, ve leke indeksi) alınmıştır. Gönüllüler 16 gün boyunca 1. ve 3. segmenti test macunu ile 2. ve 4segmenti ise kontrol macunu ile sabah ve akşam olmak üzere günde ikişer defa modifiye Bass tekniği kullanarak fırçalamışlardır. 16. günde indeksler tekrarlanmıştır. Bulgular: Kontrol macunu ile fırçalanan segmentlerde plak indeks skorlarında daha fazla artış görülmüştür (p0.05), kontrol macunu ile fırçalanan segmentlerde ise artış görülmüştür. 16. gündeki leke indeksi sonuçlarına göre test macununun diş lekelenmesini arttırdığı görülmüştür (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KOYUNCUOĞLU, C. Z., ÇİFCİBAŞI, E., ÇİNTAN, S., AMUCKA, M. (2022). A comparison of a chlorhexidine dentfrice with a conventional dentfrice: A 16-day clinical trial. İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3, 41–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/552830

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Frandsen A. Changing patterns of at- titudes and oral health behaviour. Int Dent J, 1985; 35(4): 284-90
  2. Yazıcıoğlu B, Şimşek I. Diş macunları nedir, ne değildir? TDBD, 1993; 21: 25-29
  3. Axelsson P. Current role of pharmaceu- ticals in prevention of caries and periodontal disease. Int Dent J, 1993; 43(5): 473-82
  4. Weinert W. “Oral hygiene products” In: Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Germany: Wiley-VCH, 2000. doi:10.1002/14356007. a18_209
  5. Schiott CR. Effect of chlorhexidine on the microflora of the oral cavity. J Periodon- tal Res, 1973; 8(suppl): 7-10
  6. Roberts WR, Addy M. Comparison of the in vivo and in vitro antibacterial pro- perties of antiseptic mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine, alexidine, cetyl pyridinium chloride and hexetidine. Relevance to mode of action. J Clin Periodontol, 1981; 8: 295- 310
  7. Lang NP, Hotz P, Graf H, Geering AH, Saxer UP, Sturzenberger Op, Meckel AH. Effects of supervised chlorhexidine mouth- rinses in children. A longitudinal clinical trial. J Periodontal Res, 1982; 17: 101–111
  8. Jones CG. Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard? Periodontol 2000, 1997; 15: 55-62
  9. Brecx M, Theilade J. Effect of chlor- hexidine rinses on the morphology of early dental plaque formed on plastic film. J Clin Periodontal, 1984; 11: 553–64
  10. Kornman KS. The rule of supragin- gival plaque in the prevention and treatment of periodontal disease. J Periodontal Res, 1986; 21: 5–22
  11. Grossman E, Reiter G, Sturzenberger OP, De La Rosa M, Dickinson TD, Floretti Ga, Ludlam GE, Meckel AH. Six month study of the effects of a chlorhexidine mo- uthrinse on gingivitis in adults. J Periodontal Res, 1986; 21 Suppl 1 (S16): 33–43
  12. Yates R, Jenkins S, Newcombe R, Wade W, Moran J, Addy M. A 6-month home usage trial of a 1% chlorhexidine toothpaste (1). Effects on plaque, gingivitis, calculus and toothstaining. J Clin Periodontol, 1993; 20(2): 130-38
  13. Dolles OK, Gjermo P. Caries incre- ment and gingival status during 2 years use of chlorhexidine and fluoride containing dentifrices. Scand J Dent Res, 1980; 88(1): 22–27
  14. Johansen JR, Gjermo P, Eriksen HM. Effect of two years use of chlorhexidine -containing dentifrices on plaque, gingivitis and caries. Scand J Dent Res, 1975;83(5): 288–92
  15. Jenkins S, Addy M, Newcombe R. The effects of a chlorhexidine toothpaste on the development of plaque, gingivitis and tooth staining. J Clin Periodontol, 1993; 20(1): 59-62
  16. Rathe F, Auschill TM, Sculean A, Ga-