Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2

Çocuklarda ortodontik tedavi ihtiyacı: Üç indeksin karşılaştırılması

Orthodontıc treatment needs of chıldren: Comparıson of three ındex

Pages
1–12
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Statistically significant differences were found between DAI, IOTN-DHC, IOTN-AC and ICON scores (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: An orthodontic treatment need index is a form of occlusal index devised initially to prioritize the need for treatment and to categorize the malocclusion and identify patients based upon treatment need.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: After ethical approval and informed consent were obtained; 100 children aged 10-12 years were examined for malocclusion, overjet, overbite, open bite and crossbite.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Statistically significant differences were found between DAI, IOTN-DHC, IOTN-AC and ICON scores (p
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: An orthodontic treatment need index is a form of occlusal index devised initially to prioritize the need for treatment and to categorize the malocclusion and identify patients based upon treatment need. The aim of this study was to evaluate orthodontic treatment needs of children using IOTN (Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need), DAI (the Dental Aesthetic Index) and ICON (Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need) and the relationship among the three index. Material and Methods: After ethical approval and informed consent were obtained; 100 children aged 10-12 years were examined for malocclusion, overjet, overbite, open bite and crossbite. The study models of subjects were taken and the DAI, the Dental Health Component (DHC) and the Aesthetic Component (AC) of IOTN and ICON were compared. Statistical analysis was performed by using NCSS 2007 software and regression analysis was performed between the results. Results: The mean average scores of DAI, IOTN-DHC, IOTN-AC and ICON indices were 25.44±8.05, 2.46±0.98, 4.17±2.53 and 38.67±21.08, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between DAI, IOTN-DHC, IOTN-AC and ICON scores (p

Özet

Amaç: Ortodontik tedavi ihtiyacı indeksleri, tedavi ihtiyacının önceliğinin belirlenmesi ve tedavi ihtiyacına bağlı olarak hastaların ve maloklüzyonların kategorize edilebilmesi için tasarlanan oklüzal indeks formudur. Bu araştırmanın amacı, çocuklarda ortodontik tedavi ihtiyacının IOTN (Index of Ort- hodontic Treatment Need), DAI (the Dental Aesthetic Index) ve ICON (Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need) indeksleri kullanılarak değerlendirilmesi ve bu üç indeks arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Etik kurul onayı ve bilgilendirilmiş onam formu alındıktan sonra, yaşları 10-12 arasında değişen 100 çocuk maloklüzyon, overjet, overbite, openbite ve crossbite açısından klinik ola- rak muayene edilmiştir. Hastalardan alt-üst çene alçı modeler elde edilerek DAI, IOTN-AC (Aesthetic Component), IOTN-DHC (Dental Health Component) ve ICON indeksleri kullanılarak ölçümler yapılmış ve bu ölçümler karşılaştırılmıştır. İstatistiksel analizler, NCSS 2007 software programı ve regresyon analizi yöntemi kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular: Ortalama indeks skorları DAI, IOTN-DHC, IOTN-AC ve ICON için sırasıyla 25.44±8.05, 2.46±0.98, 4.17±2.53 ve 38.67±21.08 olarak bulunmuştur. DAI, IOTN-DHC, IOTN-AC ve ICON skorları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık elde edilmiştir (p

🔖

Cite This Article

PATIR, A. M., SEYMEN, F., KORUYUCU, M., TUNA, E. B. İ., ACAR, G. (2022). Çocuklarda ortodontik tedavi ihtiyacı: Üç indeksin karşılaştırılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 1–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/552811

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Borzabadi-Farahani A. An insight into four orthodontic treatment need indices.Prog Orthod 2011;12(2):132–42
  2. Drummond RJ. Orthodontic status and treatment need of 12-year-old children in South Africa: an epidemiologicalstudy using the dental aesthetic index. Masters Thesis, University of Pretoria, 2003, p.128
  3. Daniels C, Richmond S. The devel- opment of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). J Orthod2000;27(2):149-62
  4. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment pri- ority. Eur J Orthod 1989;11(3):309-20
  5. Onyeaso CO. Orthodontic treatment complexity and need in a group of Ni- gerian patients: the relationship between the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) and the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON). J Contemp Dent Pract2007;8(3):37-44
  6. Danaei SM, Amirrad F, Salehi P. Or- thodontic treatment needs of 12-15 year old students in Shiraz, Islamic Re- public of Iran. East Mediterr Health J 2007;13(2):326-34
  7. Savastano NJ Jr, Firestone AR, Beck FM, Vig KWL. Validation of the complexity and treatment outcome components of the index of complexity, outcome, and need (ICON). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124(3):244-8
  8. Klages U, Claus N, Wehrbein H, Zentner A. Development of a questionnaire for assessment of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics in young adults. Eur J Orthod 2006;28(2):103–11
  9. Sherlock JM, Cobourne MT, McDonald F. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008;36(1):21–6
  10. Tausche E, Luck O, Harzer W. Preva- lence of malocclusions in the early mixed dentition and orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod 2004;26(3):237-44
  11. Shelton AT, Hobson RS, Slater D. A preliminary evaluation of pre-treatment hypodontia patients using the Dental Aesthetic Index: how does it compare with other commonly used indices? Eur J Orthod 2008;30(3):244-8
  12. Bernabe E, Flores-Mir C. Orthodontic treatment need in Peruvian young adults evaluated through dental aesthetic index. Angle Orthod 2006;76(3):417-21
  13. Onyeaso CO, Aderinokun GA. The re- lationship between dental aesthetic in- dex (DAI) and perceptions of aesthetics, function and speech amongst secondary school children in Ibadan, Nigeria. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003;13(5):336-41
  14. Firestone AR, Beck FM, Belgin FM, Vig KW. Validity of the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON) in determin- ing orthodontic treatment need. Angle Orthod 2002;72(1