Journals / İstanbul Tıp Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Clinicopathological evaluation of cervical polyps

Servikal poliplerin klinik-patolojik değerlendirilmesi

Pages
131–134
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Routine removal of polyps is reasonable and easy; pathological evaluation is needed to rule out other possibilities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic and demographic features in patients with cervical polyps.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We performed a search of the database to retrieve all cases with a cervical polyp who were treated in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Istanbul Education and Research Hospital between January 2006 and December 2010.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Routine removal of polyps is reasonable and easy; pathological evaluation is needed to rule out other possibilities.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic and demographic features in patients with cervical polyps. Methods: We performed a search of the database to retrieve all cases with a cervical polyp who were treated in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Istanbul Education and Research Hospital between January 2006 and December 2010. The patients’ symptoms and the size and histopathologic diagnosis of the polyp were reviewed. Patients were divided into four age groups as: Group I: 55 years. Results: The mean age was 50.36±9.36 years. The mean polyp size was 12.46±8.31 mm and the recurrence rate was 1.8% (7/381). The majority of cervical polyps were asymptomatic (66.1%). Furthermore, there was no primary malignancy on the cervical polyps. There were no significant differences in terms of diameter, symptoms, rate of recurrence, and histopathologic findings between the four groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Cervical polyps are benign lesions. Many of them are asymptomatic and are found at the time of routine gynecologic examination. Routine removal of polyps is reasonable and easy; pathological evaluation is needed to rule out other possibilities.

Özet

Amaç: Servikal polipli hastaların klinikopatolojik ve demografik özellikleri incelendi. Gereç ve Yöntem: İstanbul Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği’nde Ocak 2006 ile Aralık 2010 yılları arasında servikal polip nedeniyle tedavi edilen 381 hastanın verileri geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Hastalar yaşlarına göre dört gruba ayrıldı; Grup I: 55. Hastaların, polip çapları, semptomları ve histopatolojik tanıları karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama yaşı 50,36±9,36 idi. Poliplerin ortalama çapı; 12,46±8,31 mm idi. Nüks oranı %1,8 (7/381) idi. Poliplerin büyük çoğunluğu asemptomatikdi (%66,1). Servikal poliplerde primer malignensi saptanmadı. Dört grup arasında çap, semptom, nüks oranı ve histopatolojik tanı açısından istatistiki bir fark yoktu (p>0,05). Sonuç: Servikal polipler iyi huylu lezyonlardır. Çoğu servikal polipler asemptomatik olup rutin jinekolojik muayene sırasında tespit edilirler. Çıkarılmalarının kolay olması, diğer patolojileri ekarte etmek için patolojik değerlendirme gerekliliğinden dolayı rutin çıkarılması mantıklı olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜKSEL, M. A., BORAN, A. B., ÇELİK, S., PURİSA, S., TEMEL, İ., ABALI, R. (2022). Clinicopathological evaluation of cervical polyps. İstanbul Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 131–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/552543

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Ozsaran AA, Itil IM, Sağol S. Endometrial hyperplasia co-existing with cervical polyps. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;66:185-6
  2. Farra HK Jr, Nedoss BR. Benign tumors of the uterine cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961;81:124-37
  3. Berzolla CE, Schnatz PF, O’Sullivan DM, et al. Dysplasia and malignancy in endocervical polyps. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2007;16:1317-21
  4. Schnatz PF, Ricci S, O’Sullivan DM. Cervical polyps in postmenopausal women: is there a difference in risk? Menopause 2009;16:524-8
  5. Tirlapur SA, Adeyemo A, O’Gorman N, et al. Clinicopathological study of cervical polyps. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010;282:535-8
  6. Stenchever MA, Droegemueller W, Herbst AL, Mishell D. Comprehensive gynecology. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001. p. 492-3
  7. Mezer J. Metaplasia and carcinoma in cervical polyps. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1942;75:239-44
  8. Younis MT, Iram S, Anwar B, et al. Women with asymptomatic cervical polyps may not need to see a gynaecologist or have them removed: an observational retrospective study of 1126 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010;150:190-4
  9. Aaro LA, Jacobson LJ, Soule EH. Endocervical polyps. Obstet Gynecol 1963;21:659-65
  10. Caroti S, Siliotti F. Cervical polyps: a colpo-cyto-histological study. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1988;15:108- 15
  11. Kerner H, Lichtig C. Müllerian adenosarcoma presenting as cervical polyps: a report of seven cases and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:655- 9
  12. Mainguene C, Hugol D, Caulet S, et al. Botryoid rhabdomyosarcoma of the cervix. Clinico-pathologic study of a case. Ann Pathol 1993;13:40-4. [Abstract] 13. Jiménez-Ayala M, Martínez-Cabruja R, Esteban Casado ML, et al. Serous surface papillary carcinoma of the ovary metastatic to a cervical polyp. A case report. Acta Cytol 1996;40:765-9
  13. Stamatellos I, Stamatopoulos P, Bontis J. The role of hysteroscopy in the current management of the cervical polyps. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007;276:299-303
  14. Golan A, Ber A, Wolman I, et al. Cervical polyp: evaluation of current treatment. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1994;37:56-8
  15. Neri A, Kaplan B, Rabinerson D, et al. Cervical polyp in the menopause and the need for fractional dilatation and curettage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995;62:53-5
  16. Lutge PC. Clinical significance of cervix polyps. Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena) 1957;51:91-4. [Abstract] 18. Israel SL A study of cervical polyps. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1940;39:45-50.