Journals / İstanbul Medical Journal / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of MoCA Scale Ratings with Cognitive Level Correlation in Mild Cognitive Disorders

Hafif Bilişsel Bozuklukta MOBİD Ölçek Puanları ile Bilişsel Düzey Korelasyonunun Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
18–22
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Neuropsychologicaltest results and hippocampal volumes were comparedbetween the patient and control groups.Results: There were significant differences in hippocampal volumesand MMSE scores between the HBB patient and control groups(p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) testwas applied in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Scores of MORBID scales and cognitive level werecompared among patients with MCI to investigate if there is a correlation.We aimed to investigate the availability of the test on thediagnosis.Methods: This study included 25 healthy controls and 25 patientsdiagnosed with MCI according to the Petersen criteria.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Neuropsychologicaltest results and hippocampal volumes were comparedbetween the patient and control groups.Results: There were significant differences in hippocampal volumesand MMSE scores between the HBB patient and control groups(p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) testwas applied in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Hippocampalvolumes were compared between healthy controls andpatients with MCI. Scores of MORBID scales and cognitive level werecompared among patients with MCI to investigate if there is a correlation.We aimed to investigate the availability of the test on thediagnosis.Methods: This study included 25 healthy controls and 25 patientsdiagnosed with MCI according to the Petersen criteria. Detailedneurological examination was performed. MoCA and StandardizedMini Mental State Examination (MMSE) were used in the patientgroup, whereas MMSE was used in all participants. To all exhibitorscranial magnetic resonance imaging was performed. Right andleft hippocampal volumes were calculated using special volumetricthree-dimentional T1-weighted inversion recovery sequence. Neuropsychologicaltest results and hippocampal volumes were comparedbetween the patient and control groups.Results: There were significant differences in hippocampal volumesand MMSE scores between the HBB patient and control groups(p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada Hafif Bilişsel Bozukluk (HBB) olarak değerlendirilenhastalara Montreal Bilişsel Değerlendirme (MOBİD) ölçeği uygulandı.HBB tanısı alan hastalar ile sağlıklı kontrollerin hipokampalhacim ölçümleri karşılaştırıldı ve HBB olduğu düşünülen hastalarınMOBİD ölçek puanları ile bilişsel düzey arasında korelasyon olup olmadığınıngösterilmesi ve testin tanıda kullanılabilirliğinin araştırılmasıamaçlandı.Yöntemler: Çalışmaya Petersen kriterlerine göre HBB tanısı alan 25hasta ve sağlıklı 25 kontrol olmak üzere toplam 50 kişi dahil edildi. Katılımcılaraayrıntılı nörolojik muayene, hasta gruba Standardize MiniMental Test (SMMT) ve MOBİD, kontrol gruba SMMT uygulandı. Tümkatılımcılara Kraniyel Manyetik Rezonans Görüntüleme (MRG) yapıldı.Rutin Kranial MRG çekimi sırasında incelemeye eklenen 3 boyutlu T1Inversion Recovery (IR) sekansı ile sağ ve sol hipokampal hacimlerhesaplandı. HBB tanılı hasta ve kontrol grubunun nöropsikolojik testsonuçları ve hipokampal hacim ortalamaları ki kare ve student t testi,HBB tanılı hastalarda MOBİD ölçek puanları ile hipokampal hacimlerarasında ilişki Spearman korelasyon analizi ile incelendi.Bulgular: HBB olan hastalar ile sağlıklı kontroller arasında hipokampalhacimler ve SMMT puanları açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlıfark saptandı (sırasıyla p çağrı test test test

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAGÖZ, Y., GÜLEN, H. K. A., AKBAŞ, E. A., EMRE, U., YILDIRIM, A. (2022). Evaluation of MoCA Scale Ratings with Cognitive Level Correlation in Mild Cognitive Disorders. İstanbul Medical Journal, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 18–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/552342

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Mıhçı E. Demansların Genel Epidemiyolojisi, Risk Faktörleri ve Genetik Özellikleri. Emre M, editör. Nöroloji Temel Kitabı. İstanbul: Güneş Kitabevi; 2013. s.938-944
  2. Selekler K. Alzheimer Hastalığı: Patoloji, klinik, tanı ve ayırıcı tanı. Selekler K. editör. Modern Tıp Seminerleri:26 Alzheimer ve Diğer Demanslar. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi; 2003
  3. Du AT, Schuff N, Amend D, Laakso MP, Hsu YY, Jagust WJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001; 71: 441-7. [CrossRef] 4. Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med 2004; 256: 183-94. [CrossRef] 5. Modrego P, Fayed N, Pina MA. Conversion from mild cognitive impairment to probable Alzheimer’s Disease predicted by brain magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162: 667-75. [CrossRef] 6. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MOBİD: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 695-9. [CrossRef] 7. Selekler K, Cangöz B, Uluç S. Montreal Bilissel Değerlendirme Ölçeği (MOBİD)’nin Hafif Bilissel Bozukluk ve Alzheimer Hastalığını Ayırt Edebilme Gücünün İncelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics 2010; 13: 166-71
  4. O'brien, J. T. Role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of dementia. Br J Radiol 2007; 80: S71-7. [CrossRef] 9. Zhang Y, Schuff N, Camacho M, Chao LL, Fletcher TP, Yaffe K, et al. MRI markers for mild cognitive impairment: comparisons between white matter integrity and gray matter volume measurements. PloS One 2013; 8: 663-7. [CrossRef] 10. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: Minimental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-98. [CrossRef] 11. Rose SE, McMahon KL, Janke AL, O’Dowd B, de Zubicaray G, Strudwick MW et al. Diffusion indices on magnetic resonance imaging and neuropsychological performance in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006; 77: 1122-8. [CrossRef] 12. Davatzikos C, Fan Y, Wu X, Shen D, Resnick SM. Detection of prodromal Alzheimer's disease via pattern classification of magnetic resonance imaging. Neurobiol Aging 2008; 29: 514-23. [CrossRef] 13. Laakso MP. Structural imaging in cognitive impairment and the dementias: an update. Curr Opin Neurol 2002; 15: 415-21. [CrossRef] 14. Li G, Sokal I, Quinn