Journals / İstanbul Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

Management and Clinical Outcomes of Iatrogenic Injury Secondary to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Endoskopik Retrograd Kolanjiopankreatografi Sonrasındaki İşleme Bağlı Yaralanmaların Tedavisi ve Klinik Sonuçlarımız

Pages
28–32
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Carefulscrutiny of clinical and radiological findings is critical inchoosing the appropriate surgical intervention.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Perforation secondary to endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a rare complication but aproblematic one because of associated morbidity and mortality.In our study, we aimed to define correct timing for surgery, toanalyze and present our results on suitable methods that canbe used in the surgical management of perforation secondaryto ERCP done for various indications.Methods: The data were collected from 19 patients whounderwent surgery for perforation secondary to ERCP.We retrospectively analyzed clinical and demographiccharacteristics with the treatment outcomes of these patients.Results: The mean age of the patients was 57 years (range: 16-92).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Perforation mostly occurred during sphincterectomy,as was seen in 12 patients (63%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Carefulscrutiny of clinical and radiological findings is critical inchoosing the appropriate surgical intervention.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Perforation secondary to endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a rare complication but aproblematic one because of associated morbidity and mortality.In our study, we aimed to define correct timing for surgery, toanalyze and present our results on suitable methods that canbe used in the surgical management of perforation secondaryto ERCP done for various indications.Methods: The data were collected from 19 patients whounderwent surgery for perforation secondary to ERCP.We retrospectively analyzed clinical and demographiccharacteristics with the treatment outcomes of these patients.Results: The mean age of the patients was 57 years (range: 16-92). The ERCP procedure was for therapeutic purposes in all thepatients. Perforation mostly occurred during sphincterectomy,as was seen in 12 patients (63%). The patients underwentsurgical intervention at a mean of 42.5 hours (range: 3-192)after perforation. Postoperative mortality occurred in sevenpatients (36.8%). The mean hospitalization period was 16.5days (range: 11-49).Conclusion: Duodenal perforation is an ERCP-relatedcomplication that carries high mortality and morbidity risks,even in experienced tertiary centers. When perforation issuspected, these patients should immediately be referred toexperienced centers/units for further management. Carefulscrutiny of clinical and radiological findings is critical inchoosing the appropriate surgical intervention.

Özet

Amaç: Endoskopik retrograd kolanjiyo pankreatografi (ERCP) sonrası perforasyon nadir görülen bir komplikasyondur; ancak morbidite ve mortalitesi nedeniyle yönetimi problemlidir. Çalışmamızda, ameliyat için doğru zamanlamayı tanımlamayı, çeşitli endikasyonlar için yapılan ERCP sonrası perforasyonun cerrahi tedavisinde kullanılabilecek uygun yöntemler üzerine sonuçları analiz etmeyi ve sunmayı amaçladık. Yöntemler: ERCP’ye bağlı perforasyon nedeniyle ameliyat edilen 19 hastanın verileri toplandı. Bu hastaların tedavi sonuçları ile klinik ve demografik özellikleri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Bulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalaması 57 (16-92) idi. ERCP prosedürü tüm hastalarda tedavi amaçlı uygulanmıştı. Hastaların 12’sinde (%63) perforasyon sfinkterektomi sırasında meydana geldi. Hastalara perforasyon sonrası ortalama 42.5 (3-192) saat sonra cerrahi girişim uygulandı. Postoperatif 7 (%36,8) hastada mortalite gözlendi. Ortalama hastanede kalış süresi 16,5 gün (11-49) idi. Sonuç: Duodenal perforasyon, deneyimli merkezlerde bile yüksek mortalite ve morbidite riskleri taşıyan ERCP ilişkili bir komplikasyondur. Perforasyondan şüphelenildiğinde, bu hastalar derhal ileri tedavi için deneyimli merkezlere/birimlere yönlendirilmelidir. Uygun cerrahi müdahalenin seçiminde klinik ve radyolojik bulguların dikkatli bir şekilde incelenmesi çok önemlidir

🔖

Cite This Article

KUŞ, M., SARI, R., YABANOĞLU, H., ARER, İ. M. (2022). Management and Clinical Outcomes of Iatrogenic Injury Secondary to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. İstanbul Medical Journal, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 28–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/552315

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Joyce AM, Heiss FW. Endoscopic evaluation and therapies of biliary disorders. Surg Clin N Am 2008; 88: 1221-40
  2. Freeman ML. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Avoidance and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2012; 22: 567-86
  3. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1781-8
  4. Stapfer M, Selby RR, Stain SC, Katkhouda N, Parekh D, Jabbour N, et al. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopicretrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 191-8
  5. Kapral C, Duller C, Wewalka F, Kerstan E, Vogel W, Schreiber F. Case volume and outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a nation wide Austrian bench-marking project. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 625-30
  6. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, Hamlyn A, Logan RF, Martin D, et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut 2007; 56: 821-9
  7. Cho KB. The management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyrelated duodenalperforation. Clin Endosc 2014; 47: 341-5
  8. Krishna RP, Singh RK, Behari A, Kumar A, Saxena R, KapoorVK. Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography perforation managed by surgery or percutaneous drainage. Surg Today 2011; 41: 660-6
  9. Rabie ME, Mir NH, Al Skaini MS, El Hakeem I, Hadad A, Ageely H, et al. Operative and non-operative management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography associated duodenal injuries. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013; 95: 285-90
  10. Machado NO. Management of duodenalperforation post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. When and whom to operate and what factors determine the outcome? A review article. JOP 2012; 13: 18-25
  11. Knudson K, Raeburn CD, McIntyre RC Jr, Shah RJ, Chen YK, Brown WR, et al. Management of duodenal and pancreaticobiliary perforations associated with periampullary endoscopic procedures. Am J Surg 2008; 196: 975-81
  12. Dubecz A, Ottmann J, Schweigert M, Stadlhuber RJ, Feith M, Wiessner V, et al. Management of ERCP-related small bowel perforations: the pivotal role of physical investigation. Can J Surg 2012; 55: 99-104
  13. Pannu HK, Fishman EK. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: spectrum of abnormalities demonstrated with CT.