Journals / İstanbul Medical Journal / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

The 6-Year Single-Center Cardiac Electrophysiologic Study Experience on 1152 Patients for Cardiac Arrhythmi Adiagnosis and Treatment

Kardiyak Aritmi Tanı ve Tedavisinde 1152 Hastadan Oluşan 6 Yıllık Tek Merkez Kardiyak Elektrofizyolojik Çalışma Deneyimi

Pages
53–56
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The EPS performed in experienced centers with the same team for a long period of time results in low complication rate.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Cardiac electrophysiology study (EPS) is an invasive procedure performed for diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of our study was to assess our 6-year EPS experience and to compare our data with the complication rate published in the literature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The EPS performed in experienced centers with the same team for a long period of time results in low complication rate.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Cardiac electrophysiology study (EPS) is an invasive procedure performed for diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. The aim of our study was to assess our 6-year EPS experience and to compare our data with the complication rate published in the literature. Methods: We included 1152 patients who were diagnosed and treated for cardiac arrhythmia in our hospital between 2000-2006. The demographic data of all patients with a presumptive diagnosis of arrhythmia, EPS indications, treatment procedures, and complications were recorded. Results: Six hundred and seventy-three of 1152 (58%) patients enrolled in the study were males with a mean age of 49.6 years, and 479 (42%) were females with a mean age of 48 years. One hundred and fifty-six (13.5%) patients had bradyarrhythmia, 596 (51.8%) patients had supraventricular tachycardia, 400 (34.7%) had ventricular tachycardia. One patient had complete AV block, one patient had hemopericardium, one patient had pericardial tamponade, one patient had pneumothorax, one patient had right thrombophlebitis one patient had sheath fracture, and one patient died after left popliteal embolization. Total mortality rate was 0.6%. Conclusion: The EPS performed in experienced centers with the same team for a long period of time results in low complication rate.

Özet

Amaç: Kardiyak elektrofizyolojik çalışma (EFÇ) kardiyak aritmilerin tanı ve tedavisinde uygulanan invaziv bir yöntemdir. Çalışmamızın amacı 6 yıllık periyotta tek merkezde yapılan EFÇ deneyimimizi değerlendirmek ve komplikasyon oranlarımızı yayınlanmış literatür bilgileri ile karşılaştırmaktır.Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 2000-2006 yılları arasında tek merkezde kardiyak aritmi nedeniyle tanı ve tedavi uygulanan 1152 hasta dahil edildi. Tüm hastaların demografik bilgileri, aritmi ön tanıları, EFÇ endikasyonları, yapılan tedavi işlemleri ve karşılaşılan komplikasyonlar kayıt edildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya alınan 1152 hastanın 673'ü (%58) erkek olup yaş ortalaması 49,6 yıl, 479'u (%42) kadın olup yaş ortalaması 48 yıl olarak izlendi. 156 (13,5) hastaya bradiaritmi, 596 (%51,8) hastaya supraventriküler ta- şikardi, 400 (34,7) hastaya ise ventriküler taşikardi nedeni ile EFÇ işlemi uygulandı. Tüm EFÇ işlemleri sonucunda 1 hastada AV tam blok, 1 hastada hemoperikardiyum, 1 hastada perikardiyaltamponad, 1 hastada pnömotoraks, 1 hastada sağ trombofilebit, 1 hastada sheatfraktürü, 1 hastada ise sol poplitealembolizasyon nedeniyle ölüm ile sonuçlanan EFÇ işlemi izlenmedi. Total mortalite oranı %0,6 olarak saptandı. Sonuç: Kardiyak aritmi hastalarında deneyimli merkezlerde aynı ekip ile yapılan EFÇ işlemi düşük komplikasyon oranı ile başarıyla yapılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDE, C., DEMİR, B., TÜRKOĞLU, C., KARAKAYA, O., ÇAĞLAR, İ. M., ÇİFTÇİ, S., UNGAN, İ., YÜKSEL, Y., TÜRELİ, H., OFLAR, E., ÇAĞLAR, F. N. T., KHANKİSHİYEV, V. (2022). The 6-Year Single-Center Cardiac Electrophysiologic Study Experience on 1152 Patients for Cardiac Arrhythmi Adiagnosis and Treatment. İstanbul Medical Journal, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 53–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/552152

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Prystowsky EN, Klein GJ. Techniques in electrophysio-logictesting. In: Cardiacarrhythmias: an integratedap-proachfortheclinician. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1994. p. 299-333.
  2. Erdem A, Yazıcı M. The Cardiac Electrophysiologic Study. Abant Med J 2012; 1: 99-103. [CrossRef] Bharadwaj CP, Datta BR, Sofat CS, Madan CH, Kabde A. Through the- lookingglass: 10-year-single centreexperience in cardiac electroph- ysiology and radiofrequency ablation. Medical Journal Armed Forces İndia 2013; 69: 113-8. [CrossRef] Horowitz LN, Kay HR, Kutalek SP, Discigil KF, Webb CR, Greenspan AM, et al. Risksand Complications of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiologic Studies: A Prospective Analysis of 1,000 Consecutive Patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 9: 1261-8. [CrossRef] Chen SA, Chiang CE, Tai CT, Cheng CC, Chiou CW, Lee SH, et al. Comp- lications of diagnostic electrophysiologic studies and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with tachyarrhythmias: an eight-year- survey of 3,966 consecutiveprocedures in a tertiaryreferralcenter. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 41-6. [CrossRef] Hindricks G. The Multicentre European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS): complications of radiofrequency catheter ablation of arrhy- thmias. The Multicentre European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS) 55 investigators of the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 1993; 14: 1644-53. [CrossRef] Scheinman MM. Patterns of catheter ablation practice in the United States: results of the 1992 NASPE survey. North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994; 17: 873-5. [CrossRef] Álvarez-López M, Rodríguez-Font E, García-Alberola A. Spanish Cathe- ter Ablation Registry. Fifth official report of the Spanish Society of Car- diology Working Group on Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias (2005). Rev Esp Cardiol 2006; 59: 1165-74. [CrossRef] GE O'Hara, F Philippon, J Champagne, Blier L, Molin F, Côté JM, et al. Catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias: a 14-year experience with 5330 consecutive patients at the Quebec Heart Institute, Laval Hospi- tal. Can J Cardiol 2007; 23: 67B-70B. [CrossRef] Adalet K, Mercanoğlu F, Gündoğdu R. Radyofrekans Katater Ablasyo- nu Uygulanan Supraventriküler ve Ventriküler Taşikaritmik Hastalar- da Seri Ekokardiyografik İnceleme ile Komplikasyonların Araştırılma- sı. Türk Kardiol Dern Arş 1997; 25: 170-5.
  3. Diker E, Tezcan UK, Özdemir M. Kardiyak Aritmilerin Radyofrekans Katater Ablasyon Tekniği ile Tedavisi. Türk Kardiol Dern