AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightResults: The scores of the LPP group were significantly higher than those of the control group in ODI and in the pain, physical mobility, and energy subscales of NHP (p
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the functional status of pregnant women with lumbopelvic pain (LPP) and to determine its effect on their health-related quality of life with respect to physical, social, and emotional functions. Methods: A total of 127 pregnant women at 8-39 gestational weeks who were admitted to our outpatient pregnancy clinic were included in the study. Of these patients, 83 pregnant women who reported LPP for at least 2 weeks formed the LPP group and the remaining 44 pregnant women formed the control group. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used for assessing functional status, and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) was used for assessing the health-related quality of life. The severity of pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS pain). Results: The scores of the LPP group were significantly higher than those of the control group in ODI and in the pain, physical mobility, and energy subscales of NHP (p
Özet
Amaç: Lumbopelvik ağrısı [lumbopelvic pain (LPP)] olan gebe kadınlarda fonksiyonel durumu değerlendirmek ve fiziksel, sosyal ve emosyonel fonksiyonlar açısından sağlıkla ilişkili yaşam kalitesi üzerine etkisini saptamak. Yöntemler: Gebelik polikliniğimize başvuran 8-39 gestasyonel haftada 127 gebe kadın çalışmaya dahil edildi. En az 2 haftadır LPP tarifleyen 83 gebe kadın LPP grubunu ve kalan 44 gebe kadın ise kontrol grubunu oluşturdu. Oswestry Dizabilite İndeksi [Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)] fonksiyonel durumu, Nothingham Sağlık Profili [Nottingham Health Profile (NHP)] ise sağlıkla ilişkili yaşam kalitesini değerlendirmede kullanıldı. Ağrı şiddeti, Görsel Analog Skala-ağrı (VAS-ağrı) ile ölçüldü. Bulgular: LPP grubunun ODI ve NHP'nin ağrı, fiziksel mobilite, ve enerji alt grubundaki skorları belirgin olarak kontrollerinkinden yüksekti (p