Journals / İstanbul Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Infraclavicular and Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Upper Extremity Surgery

Üst Ekstremite Cerrahisinde İnfraklaviküler ve Supraklaviküler Brakiyal Pleksus Bloğunun Karşılaştırılması

Pages
39–43
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The time to block point, needle depth and onsetof block time were significantly longer in group I than group S(p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacyof infraclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus block inpatients undergoing upper extremity surgery.Methods: After obtaining ethics committee approval, 50patients who were between the ages of 18-80 years with an“American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)” score of I or IIand who would undergo elective upper extremity surgery inthe orthopedics and traumatology clinic were included in thestudy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients were randomly divided into two groups; 25patients in infraclavicular block group (group I) and 25 patientsin supraclavicular block group (group S).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The time to block point, needle depth and onsetof block time were significantly longer in group I than group S(p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacyof infraclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus block inpatients undergoing upper extremity surgery.Methods: After obtaining ethics committee approval, 50patients who were between the ages of 18-80 years with an“American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)” score of I or IIand who would undergo elective upper extremity surgery inthe orthopedics and traumatology clinic were included in thestudy. Patients were randomly divided into two groups; 25patients in infraclavicular block group (group I) and 25 patientsin supraclavicular block group (group S). In both groups, nerveswere searched using peripheral nerve stimulator and a total of20 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine and 20 mL 2% lidocaine wereinjected into the brachial plexus sheath. Demographic data,ASA scores, operative indications, time to block point, needledepth, onset of block time, operative time, duration of motorand sensory block, and onset of postoperative initial pain wererecorded.Results: There was no statistically significant differenceregarding the demographic data and operative time betweenthe patients. The time to block point, needle depth and onsetof block time were significantly longer in group I than group S(p

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda üst ekstremite cerrahisi uygulanacak hastalara, infraklaviküler ve supraklaviküler bölgede brakiyal pleksus blokajı uygulamalarının etkinliğinin karşılaştırılmasını amaçladık. Yöntemler: Hastanemiz etik kurul onayı alındıktan sonra ortopedi ve travmatoloji kliniğinde üst ekstremitesinden elektif olarak ameliyat olacak, “American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)” I-II aralığında, yaşları 18-80 yıl arası 50 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Olgular infraklaviküler blok (grup İ) ve supraklaviküler blok (grup S) olarak rastgele 25’er kişilik iki gruba ayrıldı. Grupların her ikisinde de periferik sinir stimülatörü yardımıyla ameliyat bölgesine göre iki ayrı sinir aranarak, toplamda 20 mL %0,5 levobupivakain ve 20 mL %2 lidokain brakiyal pleksus kılıf içerisine enjekte edildi. Hastaların demografik verileri, ASA skorları, ameliyat endikasyonları, blok noktasına ulaşma süreleri, iğne derinliği, blok başlama süresi, ameliyat süresi, motor ve duysal blok süresi ile ilk ağrı başlama süresi kaydedildi. Bulgular: Olguların demografik verilerinde ve ameliyat sürelerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark yoktu. Blok noktasına ulaşma süresi, iğne derinliği ve blok başlama süresi grup İ’de grup S’ye göre anlamlı derecede daha uzun bulundu (hepsi için; p

🔖

Cite This Article

ALDEMİR, M. T., FERLENGEZ, A. G. (2022). Comparison of Infraclavicular and Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Upper Extremity Surgery. İstanbul Medical Journal, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 39–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/551907

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Erdine S. Rejyonal Anestezi. Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, İstanbul 2005: 7-33, 83-5, 93-5
  2. Şahin Ş. Santral ve periferik sinir blokları el kitabı. Rejyonal Anestezi Derneği, İstanbul 2004: 1-2: 112-7
  3. Esener Z. Klinik Anestezi. Logos Yayıncılık Tic. A.Ş., İstanbul 1997: 439: 441- 452
  4. Işık G. Rejyonel Anestezi. Supraklaviküler blok http://med.c.edu.tr/anestezi/ rejbrakial.htm 2002
  5. Erdine S. Sinir Blokları. Emre Matbaacılık, İstanbul 1993: 49-80, 109-128
  6. Abhinaya RJ, Venkatraman R, Matheswaran P, Sivarajan G. A randomised comparative evaluation of supraclavikular and infraclavicular approaches to brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries using both ultrasound and nerve stimulator. Indian J Anaesth 2017; 61: 581-6
  7. Schulz-Stubner S. Brachial plexus. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2003; 52: 643-56
  8. Hadzic A, Arliss J, Kerimoglu B. A comparison of infraclavicular nerve block versus general anesthesia for hand and wrist daycase surgeries Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 127-32
  9. Rodriguez J, Barcena M, Lagunilla J, Alvarez J. İncreased success rate with infraclavicular brachial plexus block using a dual-injection technique. J Clin Anesth. 2004; 16: 251-6
  10. Krafft P, Eibenberger K, Fitzgerald R. Ultrasound guided supraclavicular approach for regional anesthesia of the brachial plexus. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 507-13
  11. Korbon GA, Carron H, Lander CJ. First rib palpation: A safer, easier technique for supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 1989; 68: 682-5
  12. Bridenbaugh LD. The upper extremity: Neural Blockade. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia 1988: 393-7
  13. Neuburger M, Kaiser H, Uhl M. Biometric data on risk of pneumothorax from vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block. A magnetic resonance imaging study. Anaesthesist 2001; 50: 511-6
  14. Cox B, Durieux ME, Marcus MA. Toxicity of local anaesthetics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2003; 17: 111-36
  15. De Jose Maria B, Banus E, Navarro Egea M, Serrano S, Perello M, Mabrok M. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular vs infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2008; 18: 838-44.