Journals / İstanbul Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

Prostate Cancer and Bone Marrow Involvement

Prostat Kanseri ve Kemik İliği Tutulumu

Pages
196–199
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall survival (OS) wasdemonstrated by Kaplan–Meier analysis, and the curves werecompared by the log-rank test.Results: The median age of patients was 67.5 years (range:46-83 years).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Bone marrow involvement (BoMI) may becommon during the tumour’s lifespan or, sometimes, it maybe the first sign of manifestation of a disease.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thepurpose of this study is to explore the results of prostate cancerwith BoMI that is diagnosed by bone marrow biopsy.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 55 patients with BoMIof solid tumours and 8 patients with histopathologicallyproven BoMI of prostate cancer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall survival (OS) wasdemonstrated by Kaplan–Meier analysis, and the curves werecompared by the log-rank test.Results: The median age of patients was 67.5 years (range:46-83 years).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Bone marrow involvement (BoMI) may becommon during the tumour’s lifespan or, sometimes, it maybe the first sign of manifestation of a disease. Prostate cancerat an extensive stage has osteoblastic bone metastasis. Thepurpose of this study is to explore the results of prostate cancerwith BoMI that is diagnosed by bone marrow biopsy.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 55 patients with BoMIof solid tumours and 8 patients with histopathologicallyproven BoMI of prostate cancer. The overall survival (OS) wasdemonstrated by Kaplan–Meier analysis, and the curves werecompared by the log-rank test.Results: The median age of patients was 67.5 years (range:46-83 years). Bone was the most common site of metastasis,except BoMI (n=8, 100%). At the time of diagnosis of BoMI,the most abnormal haematological findings were anaemia(87.5%) and thrombocytopenia (87.5%), followed by leucopenia(37.5%). The median time of BoMI was 16.8 months (range:0-57.8). The median and mean OS after the diagnosis ofBoMI were 38 days [95% confidence interval (CI); 0-175.2]and 143 days (95% CI; 27.7-259.9), respectively. According tothe treatment status after BoMI, median OS were 215 days forpatients who underwent oncologic treatment and 21 days inpatients followed up with best supportive care (BSC) (p=0.014).Conclusion: BoMI in prostate cancer and other solid tumoursremain a dismal situation. According to survival differencebetween the patients who received treatment and BSC afterBoMI diagnosis, patients who are eligible for oncologictreatment should be encouraged for continuing the treatment.

Özet

Amaç: Kemik iliği tutulumu (KeIT) tümörün seyri boyunca yaygın olabilir veya bazen hastalık belirtisinin ilk belirtisi olabilir. Yaygın evre prostat kanseri genellikle osteoblastik kemik metastazına sahiptir. Bu çalışmada kemik iliği biyopsisi ile tanı konan KeIT prostat kanseri sonuçlarını araştırmayı amaçladık. Yöntemler: KeIT olan solid tümörlü 55 hasta vardı ve histopatolojik olarak kanıtlanmış prostat kanseri tanısı olan toplam 8 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi. Genel sağkalım (GSK), Kaplan-Meier analizi ile gösterildi ve eğriler log-rank testi ile karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların ortanca yaşı 67.5 idi (46-83). Kemik, KeIT dışında en sık metastaz bölgesiydi (n=8, %100). KeIT tanısı sırasında anormal hematolojik bulgular anemi (% 87.5) ve trombositopeni (%87.5), ardından lökopeni (%37.5) idi. Ortalama KeIT süresi 16.8 aydı (0-57.8). KeIT tanısı sonrası ortalama ve ortanca GSK sırasıyla 38 gün (%95 GA; 0-175.2) ve 143 gün (% 95 GA; 27.7-259.9) olarak saptandı. KeIT sonrası tedavi durumuna göre ortanca GSK, onkolojik tedavi uygulanan hastalar için 215 gün ve palyatif destek tedavisi ile takip edilen hastalarda 21 gün idi (p=0.014). Sonuç: KeIT, prostat kanseri ve diğer solid tümörlerde kasvetli olmaya devam etmektedir. KeIT tanısı sonrası tedavi grupları arasındaki sağkalım farkına göre, uygun hastalar onkolojik tedavi için teşvik edilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇINKIR, H. Y., BOZDAĞ, Z. (2022). Prostate Cancer and Bone Marrow Involvement. İstanbul Medical Journal, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 196–199. https://ajindex.com/articles/551882

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Shiozawa Y, Eber MR, Berry JE, Taichman RS. Bone marrow as a metastatic niche for disseminated tumor cells from solid tumors. Bonekey Rep 2015; 4: 689
  2. Singh G, Krause JR, Breitfeld V. Bone marrow examination: For metastatic tumor: Aspirate and biopsy. Cancer 1977; 40: 2317-21
  3. Wong KF, Chan JK, Ma SK. Solid tumour with initial presentation in the bone marrow -A clinicopathologic study of 25 adult cases. Hematol Oncol 1993; 11: 35-42
  4. Miles FL, Kurtoglu S, Ahmer C, Soori M, Favate JS, Sikes RA. Transforming growth factor-β signaling induced during prostate cancer cell death and neuroendocrine differentiation is mediated by bone marrow stromal cells. Prostate 2015; 75: 1802-13. 5. 5.Mehdi SR, Bhatt MLB. Metastasis of Solid Tumors in Bone Marrow: A Study from Northern India. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2011; 27: 93-5
  5. Tasleem RA, Chowdhary ND, Kadri SM, Chowdhary QA. Metastasis of solid tumors in bone marrow: A study from Kashmir India. J Clin Pathol 2003; 56: 803
  6. Kılıçkap S, Erman M, Dinçer M, Aksoy S, Harputluoğlu H, Yalçın Ş. Bone marrow metastasis of solid tumors: Clinicopathological evaluation of 73 cases. Turk J Cancer 2007; 37: 85-8
  7. Krishnan C, George TI, Arber DA. Bone Marrow Metastases: A Survey of nonhematologic metastases with immunohistochemical study of metastatic carcinomas. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2007; 15: 1-7
  8. Hung Y-S, Chou W-C, Chen T-D, Chen TC, Wang P-N, Chang H, et al. Prognostic factors in adult patients with solid cancers and bone marrow metastases. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014; 15: 61-7
  9. Mohanty SK, Dash S. Bone marrow metastasis in solid tumors. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2003; 46: 613-6. 11. 11.Park SH, Keller ET, Shiozawa Y. Bone marrow microenvironment as a regulator and therapeutic target for prostate cancer bone metastasis. Calcif Tissue Int 2018; 102: 152-62
  10. Kucukzeybek BB, Calli AO, Kucukzeybek Y, Bener S, Dere Y, Dirican A, et al. The prognostic significance of bone marrow metastases: evaluation of 58 cases. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2014; 57: 396-9
  11. Kwon JY, Yun J, Kim HJ, Kim KH, Kim SH, Lee SC, et al. Clinical outcome of gastric cancer patients with bone marrow metastases. Cancer Res Treat 2011; 43: 244-9.