Journals / İstanbul Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 5

Intraoperative Neurophysiology Practice in the Surgical Treatment of Posterior Fossa Lesions: Cerrahpaşa Experience

Pages
344–349
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Comprehensive multimodality monitoring providesareal-time,completeassessmentofcritical neurological structures, facilitates safer and more aggressive management and thus improves quality of life.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Posterior fossa surgery involves a risk of injury on a variety of critical neurological structures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This present study aims to evaluate the IONM experience in posterior fossa surgery of a tertiery neurosurgical centre.Methods: Forty-five patients (26 females, 19 males; age between 2 and 72 years) who underwent surgery for different posterior fossa pathologies from 2016 to 2019 were retrospectively evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Comprehensive multimodality monitoring providesareal-time,completeassessmentofcritical neurological structures, facilitates safer and more aggressive management and thus improves quality of life.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Posterior fossa surgery involves a risk of injury on a variety of critical neurological structures. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has become a routine scrutiny with newly developed tests for sparing these structures. This present study aims to evaluate the IONM experience in posterior fossa surgery of a tertiery neurosurgical centre.Methods: Forty-five patients (26 females, 19 males; age between 2 and 72 years) who underwent surgery for different posterior fossa pathologies from 2016 to 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Six and thirteen patients experienced extremity motor evoked potential (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potential changes respectively. Brainstem auditory evoked potential changes were seen in four patients. Corticobulber MEP (CoMEP) of facial nerve deteriorated in seven patients. All new onset neurological deficits of cranial nerves or long tracts were concordant with IONM findings except for one patient who developed 6th nerve palsy without CoMEP findings. Loss of neurological function immediately after surgery was observed in 13 patients while permanent evident neurological worsening occurred in five patients.Conclusion: IONM is an indispensable component of the skull base surgery. Comprehensive multimodality monitoring providesareal-time,completeassessmentofcritical neurological structures, facilitates safer and more aggressive management and thus improves quality of life.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞKIRAN, E., KÜÇÜKYÜRÜK, B. (2022). Intraoperative Neurophysiology Practice in the Surgical Treatment of Posterior Fossa Lesions: Cerrahpaşa Experience. İstanbul Medical Journal, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 5, 344–349. https://ajindex.com/articles/551846

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Macdonald DB. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update. J Clin Monit Comput 2006; 20: 347-77
  2. Toleikis JR, American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Intraoperative monitoring using somatosensory evoked potentials. A position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput 2005; 19: 241-58
  3. Rhoton AL Jr. Cerebellum and fourth ventricle. Neurosurgery 2000; 47: S7-27
  4. Deletis V, Urriza J, Ulkatan S, Fernandez-Conejero I, Lesser J, Misita D. The feasibility of recording blink reflexes under general anesthesia. Muscle Nerve 2009; 39: 642-6
  5. Neuloh G, Bogucki J, Schramm J. Intraoperative preservation of corticospinal function in the brainstem. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 417-22
  6. Romstock J, Strauss C, Fahlbusch R. Continuous electromyography monitoring of motor cranial nerves during cerebellopontine angle surgery. J Neurosurg 2000; 93: 586-93
  7. Ulkatan S, Jaramillo AM, Tellez MJ, Goodman RR, Deletis V. Feasibility of eliciting the H reflex in the masseter muscle in patients under general anesthesia. Clin Neurophysiol 2017; 128: 123-7
  8. Dong CC, Macdonald DB, Akagami R, Westerberg B, Alkhani A, Kanaan I, et al. Intraoperative facial motor evoked potential monitoring with transcranial electrical stimulation during skull base surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 116: 588-96
  9. Deletis V, Fernandez-Conejero I, Ulkatan S, Costantino P. Methodology for intraoperatively eliciting motor evoked potentials in the vocal muscles by electrical stimulation of the corticobulbar tract. Clin Neurophysiol 2009; 120: 336-41
  10. Guideline 11A: Recommended Standards for Neurophysiologic Intraoperative Monitoring - Principles, in Society ACN (ed), 2009
  11. Morota N, Ihara S, Deletis V. Intraoperative neurophysiology for surgery in and around the brainstem: role of brainstem mapping and corticobulbar tract motor-evoked potential monitoring. Childs Nerv Syst 2010; 26: 513-21
  12. Simon MV, Michaelides C, Wang S, Chiappa KH, Eskandar EN. The effects of EEG suppression and anesthetics on stimulus thresholds in functional cortical motor mapping. Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 121: 784-92
  13. Polo G, Fischer C, Sindou MP, Marneffe V. Brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential changes and warning values to prevent hearing loss--prospective study in a consecutive series of 84 pa