Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Rehabilitation after successful finger replantation

Pages
22–26
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Functional results of patients who adjust to the rehabilitation program, home practice, and splint usage are better.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess results of rehabilitation of patients after finger replantation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: The study examined 160 fingers amputated and replanted at various levels between 2000 and 2013 at the clinic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Functional results of patients who adjust to the rehabilitation program, home practice, and splint usage are better.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess results of rehabilitation of patients after finger replantation. METHODS: The study examined 160 fingers amputated and replanted at various levels between 2000 and 2013 at the clinic. Mean patient age was 29.4 years. Mean follow-up time was 23 months. Rehabilitation of fingers began between postoperative fourth and eighth week and continued until the 24th week. Range of motion of affected hand, return to daily activities, aesthetic appearance, and patient satisfaction were assessed according to Tamai criteria.RESULTS: Functional results according to Tamai criteria were perfect in 36 patients, good in 54 patients, average in 27 patients, and poor in 18 patients. CONCLUSION: Post-operative rehabilitation of replanted fingers should begin as soon as possible. During the rehabilitation period, physiotherapist, surgeon, and patient must work in close cooperation. Functional results of patients who adjust to the rehabilitation program, home practice, and splint usage are better.

🔖

Cite This Article

KABAKAS, F., UGURLAR, M., CELİKDELEN, P., SEZER, I., OZCELİK, I. B., PURİSA, H. (2022). Rehabilitation after successful finger replantation. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 22–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/551643

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Tamai S. Twenty years' experience of limb replantation - review of 293 upper ext gremity replants. J Hand Surg Am 1982;7:549- 56. Cambridge CA. Range of motion measurements in the hand. In: Hunter J, Schneider LH, Mackin EJ, Callahan AD, editors. Re- habilitation of the Hand Surgery and Therapy. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1990. p.82-92.
  2. Matsuzaki H, Yoshizu T, Maki Y, Tsubokawa N. Functional and cosmetic results of fingertip replantation: anastomosing only the digital artery. Ann Plast Surg 2004;53:353-9.
  3. Semmes J, Weinstein S, Ghent L, Teber HL. Somatosensory changes after penetrating brain wounds in man. Cambridge, Massachusets, Harvard University Press; 1960. p.91. Weber RA, Breindenbach WC, Brown RE, Jabaley ME, Mas DP. A randomized prospective study of polyglycolic acid con- duits for digital nerve reconstruction in humans. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:1036-45. Papanastasiou S. Rehabilitation of the replanted upper extrem- ity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:978-81.
  4. Ross DC, Manktelow RT, Wells MT, Boyd JB. Tendon function after replantation: prognostic factors and strategies to enhange total active motion. Ann Plast Surg 2003;51:141-6.
  5. Sagiv P, Shabat S, Mann M, Ashur H, Nyska M. Rehabilitation process and functional results of patient with amputated fingers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:497-503.
  6. Silverman PMN, Vilette-Green W, Petrilli J. Early protective motion in digital revascularization and replantation. J Hand Ther 1989;2:84-101. Kader PB. Therapist's management of the replanted hand. Hand Clin 1986;2:179-91.
  7. Scheker LR, Hodges A. Brace and rehabilitation after rehabilita- tion and revascularization. Hand Clin 2001;17:473-80.