Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Giant arachnoid granulation mimicking dural sinus thrombosis

Pages
83–85
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

MR imaging combined with MR venography is the most useful diagnostic tool to differentiate giant AG from dural sinus thrombosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Arachnoid granulations (AG) are composed of dense, collagenous connective tissue that includes clusters of arachnoid cells.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Presently described is the case of a 21-year-old female who presented at the clinic with recurrent headaches.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:MR imaging combined with MR venography is the most useful diagnostic tool to differentiate giant AG from dural sinus thrombosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Arachnoid granulations (AG) are composed of dense, collagenous connective tissue that includes clusters of arachnoid cells. They tend to invaginate into the dural sinuses, through which cerebrospinal fluid enters the venous system. AG are most commonly seen at the junction between the middle and lateral thirds of the transverse sinuses near the entry sites of the superficial veins. Presently described is the case of a 21-year-old female who presented at the clinic with recurrent headaches. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging revealed a 3.5-cm lesion, which extended from confluens sinuum through the superior sagittal sinus. The lesion had created a scallop-shaped area of erosion in the neighboring occipital bone. To exclude sinus thrombosis, MR venography was performed, which displayed a maintained venous flow around the lesion. Headaches were treated symptomatically with medical therapy. Giant AG can be misdiagnosed as dural sinus thrombosis. MR imaging combined with MR venography is the most useful diagnostic tool to differentiate giant AG from dural sinus thrombosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, A., SENTURK, S., BAYSAL, B., AYAZ, E., ATALAY, B. (2022). Giant arachnoid granulation mimicking dural sinus thrombosis. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 83–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/551597

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Kan P, Stevens EA, Couldwell WT. Incidental giant arachnoid granulation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1491-2
  2. Lu CX, Du Y, Xu XX, Li Y, Yang HF, Deng SQ, et al. Multiple occipital defects caused by arachnoid granulations: Emphasis on T2 mapping. World J Radiol 2012;4:341-4
  3. Haybaeck J, Silye R, Soffer D. Dural arachnoid granulations and "giant" arachnoid granulations. Surg Radiol Anat 2008;30:417-21
  4. Brunori A, Vagnozzi R, Giuffrè R. Antonio Pacchioni (1665-1726): early studies of the dura mater. J Neurosurg 1993;78:515-8
  5. Choi HJ, Cho CW, Kim YS, Cha JH. Giant arachnoid granulation misdiagnosed as transverse sinus thrombosis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2008;43:48-50
  6. Leach JL, Jones BV, Tomsick TA, Stewart CA, Balko MG. Normal appearance of arachnoid granulations on contrast-enhanced CT and MR of the brain: differentiation from dural sinus disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1523-32
  7. Haroun AA, Mahafza WS, Al Najar MS. Arachnoid granulations in the cerebral dural sinuses as demonstrated by contrastenhanced 3D magnetic resonance venography. Surg Radiol Anat 2007;29:323-8
  8. Ayanzen RH, Bird CR, Keller PJ, McCully FJ, Theobald MR, Heiserman JE. Cerebral MR venography: normal anatomy and potential diagnostic pitfalls. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:74-8.