Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Retrospective analysis of cases of intestinal invagination treated and followed-up at our clinic

Pages
141–144
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Though a rare cause of acute abdomen and/or ileus in adults, invagination is a clinical condition that must be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to present data on the diagnosis, treatment, clinical course, and outcome of cases of intestinal invagination.METHODS: Data of 11 patients treated for intestinal invagination at one center between June 2009 and July 2015 were analyzed retrospectively in terms of demographic data, etiological factors, anatomical localization of invagination, admission complaints, physical examination findings, diagnostic imaging modalities used, postoperative complications, and hospital stay.RESULTS: Of the total, 9 (81.8%) patients were female and 2 (18.2%) were male.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Nine (81.8%) cases occurred due to benign causes and 2 to malignant causes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Though a rare cause of acute abdomen and/or ileus in adults, invagination is a clinical condition that must be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to present data on the diagnosis, treatment, clinical course, and outcome of cases of intestinal invagination.METHODS: Data of 11 patients treated for intestinal invagination at one center between June 2009 and July 2015 were analyzed retrospectively in terms of demographic data, etiological factors, anatomical localization of invagination, admission complaints, physical examination findings, diagnostic imaging modalities used, postoperative complications, and hospital stay.RESULTS: Of the total, 9 (81.8%) patients were female and 2 (18.2%) were male. Nine (81.8%) cases occurred due to benign causes and 2 to malignant causes. One (9%) patient had jejunojejunal invagination, 5 (45.5%) had ileoileal invagination, and 5 (45.5%) had ileocecal invagination. Right hemicolectomy-ileotransversostomy was performed in 5 (45.5%) patients and segmental small bowel resection with end-to-end anastomosis in 6 (54.5%).CONCLUSION: Intestinal invagination is a rare cause of acute abdomen in adults that may have a variety of etiologies and therefore may present with different clinical pictures. Abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting are the most common symptoms. The rate of accurate diagnosis is 30% to 35% using ultrasonography and 50% to 80% using computerized tomography. In adults, the preferred treatment is surgery. As malignant pathologies are responsible for some cases of invagination, oncological principles should be strictly observed in surgical treatment. Though a rare cause of acute abdomen and/or ileus in adults, invagination is a clinical condition that must be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

INCE, V., YONDER, H., OZDEMİR, F., SARİCİ, K. B., BARUT, B. (2022). Retrospective analysis of cases of intestinal invagination treated and followed-up at our clinic. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 141–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/551590

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Chandra N, Campbell S, Gibson M, Reece-Smith H, Mee A. Intussusception caused by a heterotopic pancreas. Case report and literature review. JOP 2004;5:476-9
  2. Patrizi G, Di Rocco G, Giannotti D, Casella G, Casella Mariolo JR, Bernieri MG, et al. Double ileo-ceco-colic invagination due to right colon carcinoma: clinical presentation and management. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013;17:2267-9
  3. Gonzalez-Hernandez J, Garcia F. Cecal adenocarcinoma presenting as colonic intussusception in adulthood. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2015;28:180-2
  4. Korkmaz Ö, Yılmaz HG, Taçyıldız İ, Baç B, Çevik S. Erişkinlerde Görülen İnvajinasyon Olgularının Değerlendirilmesi. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 2007;34:182-6
  5. Yakan S, Caliskan C, Makay O, Denecli AG, Korkut MA. Intussusception in adults: clinical characteristics, diagnosis and operative strategies. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:1985-9
  6. Toso C, Erne M, Lenzlinger PM, Schmid JF, Büchel H, Melcher G, et al. Intussusception as a cause of bowel obstruction in adults. Swiss Med Wkly 2005;135:87-90
  7. Lu T, Chng YM. Adult intussusception. Perm J 2015;19:79-81
  8. Azar T, Berger DL. Adult intussusception. Ann Surg 1997;226:134-8
  9. Kaya F, Kızıltan R, Şit M, Yılmaz EE. İleoçekal İnvajinasyona Neden Olan İntestinal Non-Hodgkin Lenfoma: Olgu Sunumu. Abant Tıp Dergisi 2012;1:162-4
  10. Kannan U, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Patel AN, Gaduputi V, Shah AK. Jejunal Intussusception: A Rare Presentation of Carcinoid Tumor. Case Rep Surg 2015;2015:260697
  11. Barussaud M, Regenet N, Briennon X, de Kerviler B, Pessaux P, Kohneh-Sharhi N, et al. Clinical spectrum and surgical approach of adult intussusceptions: a multicentric study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21:834-9.