Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Clinical approach to pediatric neck masses: Retrospective analysis of 98 cases

Pages
225–232
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ultrasound should be the first preference for imaging, and excisional biopsy is suggested rather than fine needle aspiration biopsy for histopathological sampling in pediatric neck masses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Pediatric neck masses (PNMs) are a frequently encountered problem in otorhinolaryngology practice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to differences among clinicians in the assessment of a PNM, studies investigating this subject are significant contributions to the literature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ultrasound should be the first preference for imaging, and excisional biopsy is suggested rather than fine needle aspiration biopsy for histopathological sampling in pediatric neck masses.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric neck masses (PNMs) are a frequently encountered problem in otorhinolaryngology practice. The clinical approach to cervical masses in childhood varies from that of adults. Due to differences among clinicians in the assessment of a PNM, studies investigating this subject are significant contributions to the literature. For this reason, a review was conducted of pediatric PNM cases with an open biopsy (incisional/excisional) and a histopathological diagnosis.METHODS: The hospital records of 98 (34 girls, 64 boys) pediatric patients aged between 8.5 months and 16 years were reviewed. The history, physical examination findings, blood tests, medical treatments, imaging reports, and the pathology and/or microbiology results of the patients were recorded and evaluated. The cervical masses were categorized according to the etiology, imaging features, size, and location.RESULTS: Surgical biopsy was planned due to the suspicion of malignancy, typical clinical presentation or location, or size greater than 20 mm despite antibiotherapy for 2 to 6 weeks. Excisional biopsy (91.8%) was the first choice for histopathological sampling. Infectious masses were observed most commonly, followed by congenital and neoplastic masses, at a rate of 49%, 27.6%, and 23.4%, respectively. Hodgkin lymphoma was the most frequent type of malignancy (39.1%). Thyroglossal and branchial cysts constituted 74.1% of congenital masses. Sixty-seven percent of all masses were solid, and the lateral levels of the neck were the most affected locations (44.9%). CONCLUSION: In most cases, the diagnosis can be made with a detailed history and physical examination. In the presence of nonspecific findings, blood tests, imaging, and histopathological sampling are required. Ultrasound should be the first preference for imaging, and excisional biopsy is suggested rather than fine needle aspiration biopsy for histopathological sampling in pediatric neck masses.

🔖

Cite This Article

COSKUN, B. U., UNSAL, O., SOYTAS, P., HASCİCEK, S. O. (2022). Clinical approach to pediatric neck masses: Retrospective analysis of 98 cases. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 225–232. https://ajindex.com/articles/551566

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Gov-Ari E, Leann Hopewell B. Correlation between pre-operative diagnosis and post-operative pathology reading in pediatric neck masses--a review of 281 cases. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015;79:2-7
  2. Albright JT, Topham AK, Reilly JS. Pediatric head and neck malignancies: US incidence and trends over 2 decades. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:655-9
  3. Sidell DR, Shapiro NL. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for midline neck masses in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;144:431-4
  4. Eapen A, Kamat D. Neck Masses in Children. Clinical Pediatrics 2014;53:1027-9
  5. Jeremy DM, Grimmer JF. Evaluation and management of neck masses in children. Am Fam Physician 2014;89;353-8
  6. Ahuja AT, Ying M. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy: is power Doppler sonography routinely indicated? Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:353-9
  7. Brown RL, Azizkhan RG. Pediatric head and neck lesions. Pediatr Clin North Am 1998;45:889-905
  8. Rosenberg HK. Sonography of pediatric neck masses. Ultrasound Q 2009;25:111-27
  9. Torsiglieri AJ Jr, Tom LW, Ross AJ 3rd, Wetmore RF, Handler SD, Potsic WP. Pediatric neck masses: guidelines for evaluation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1988;16:199-210
  10. Ahuja AT, Ying M. Sonographic Evaluation of Cervical Lymph Nodes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1691-9. 11. van den Brekel MW, Castelijns JA, Stel HV, Golding RP, Meyer CJ, Snow GB. Modern imaging techniques and ultrasound-guid232 North Clin Istanb ed aspiration cytology for the assessment of neck node metastases: a prospective comparative study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1993;250:11-7
  11. Genc B. Approach to Childhood Lymphadenopathy. The Journal of Pediatric Research 2014;1:6-12
  12. Handa U, Mundi I, Mohan S. Nodal tuberculosis revisited: a review. J Infect Dev Ctries2012;6:6-12
  13. Ahuja AT, Ying M. Sonography of neck lymph nodes. Part II: Abnormal lymph nodes. Clin Radiol 2003;58:359-66
  14. Huyett P, Monaco SE, Choi SS, Simons JP. Utility of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in the Evaluation of Pediatric Head and Neck Masses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;154:928-35
  15. Chhieng DC, Cangiarella JF, Symmans WF, Cohen JM. Fine needle aspiration cytology of Hodgkin disease - A study of 89 cases with emphasis on the false-negative cases. Cancer Cytopathol 2001;93:52-9. 17. van de Schoot L, Aronson DC, Behrendt H, Bras J. The role of fine-needle aspiration cytology in children with persistent or suspicious lymphadenopathy. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36:7-11.