Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

An unusual complication of posterior packing in epistaxis

Pages
157–159
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Endonasal insertion of catheters or tubes in trauma patients without acomplete assessment of the skull base can cause serious complications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Endonasal or transnasal procedures are sometimes necessary in patients with head trauma.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A 54-year-old man was taken to adistrict hospital following a car accident.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Endonasal insertion of catheters or tubes in trauma patients without acomplete assessment of the skull base can cause serious complications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Endonasal or transnasal procedures are sometimes necessary in patients with head trauma. Before these procedures, theintegrity of the skull base must be considered to avoid penetration of the cranial vault. A 54-year-old man was taken to adistrict hospital following a car accident. After the initial assessment and emergency treatment, he was transferred to ouremergency clinic for further examination. The patient had massive nasal bleeding, though a Foley catheter had been insertedto control posterior bleeding. Computed tomography (CT) revealed that the catheter was not positioned correctly and was inthe cranial vault. Several fractures of the maxillofacial and cranial bones and cervical vertebrae were detected on CT. He alsohad right hemothorax and bilateral brain contusions. Endonasal insertion of catheters or tubes in trauma patients without acomplete assessment of the skull base can cause serious complications.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALĞIN, A., ERDOĞAN, B., ÖZTÜRK, E., ÇOLAK, Ş., ERDOĞAN, M. Ö., YUSUFOĞLU, K., AFACAN, M. A., TAYFUR, İ. (2022). An unusual complication of posterior packing in epistaxis. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 157–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/551523

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Krajina A, Chrobok V. Radiological diagnosis and management of epistaxis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014;37:26–36
  2. Villwock JA, Jones K. Recent trends in epistaxis management in the United States: 2008-2010. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;139:1279–84
  3. Dubel GJ, Ahn SH, Soares GM. Transcatheter embolization in the management of epistaxis. Semin Intervent Radiol 2013;30:249–62
  4. Jones AP, Diddee R, Bonner S. Insertion of a nasogastric tube under direct vision. Anaesthesia 2006;61:305
  5. Spurrier EJ, Johnston AM. Use of nasogastric tubes in trauma patients-a review. J R Army Med Corps 2008;154:10–3
  6. Pawar SJ, Sharma RR, Lad SD. Intracranial migration of Foley catheteran unusual complication. J Clin Neurosci 2003;10:248–9
  7. Veeravagu A, Joseph R, Jiang B, Lober RM, Ludwig C, Torres R, et al. Traumatic epistaxis: Skull base defects, intracranial complications and neurosurgical considerations. Int J Surg Case Rep 2013;4:656–61.