Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Preoperative Evaluation of Liver Volume in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Pages
1–5
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Physicians working in the field of transplantation should be aware of the fact that a difference of 10% between the predicted and the actual graft volume is usually encountered.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate the difference between the preoperative estimated volume and the actual intraoperative graft volume determined in donor right hepatectomies and to evaluate the possible effect of age, gender, and body mass index on the difference.METHODS: A total of 225 donor hepatectomies performed at the center between 2016 and 2017 were evaluated for the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result, 174 donor right hepatectomies were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Physicians working in the field of transplantation should be aware of the fact that a difference of 10% between the predicted and the actual graft volume is usually encountered.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate the difference between the preoperative estimated volume and the actual intraoperative graft volume determined in donor right hepatectomies and to evaluate the possible effect of age, gender, and body mass index on the difference.METHODS: A total of 225 donor hepatectomies performed at the center between 2016 and 2017 were evaluated for the study. Left hepatectomies and left lateral segmentectomies were excluded from the analysis. As a result, 174 donor right hepatectomies were included in the study. Volumetric analysis was performed with dynamic hepatic computed tomography (CT), including non-contrast analysis, followed by non-ionic, contrast-enhanced arterial, portal, and hepatic-phase, thin-slice scanning. Volumetric analysis was performed based on the CT images using automatic volume calculating software.RESULTS: The mean preoperatively estimated graft volume was 800±112 g and the mean intraoperatively measured actual graft volume was 750±131 g. There was a statistically significant difference (p=0.003). Age and body mass index had a significant impact on the discrepancy between the predicted and actual graft volume, while gender did not.CONCLUSION: A thorough preoperative evaluation of the donor graft volume should be performed in order to prevent donor morbidity and mortality, as well as small-for-size and large-for-size phenomena in the implanted grafts. Physicians working in the field of transplantation should be aware of the fact that a difference of 10% between the predicted and the actual graft volume is usually encountered.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, T., YILMAZ, S., IŞIK, B., BAŞKIRAN, A., KAHRAMAN, A. S., ÇİÇEK, İ. B. (2022). Preoperative Evaluation of Liver Volume in Living Donor Liver Transplantation. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 1–5. https://ajindex.com/articles/551508

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Mussin N, Sumo M, Lee KW, Choi Y, Choi JY, Ahn SW, et al. The correlation between preoperative volumetry and real graft weight: comparison of two volumetry programs. Ann Surg Treat Res 2017;92:214–20.
  2. Frericks BB, Caldarone FC, Nashan B, Savellano DH, Stamm G, Kirchhoff TD, et al. 3D CT modeling of hepatic vessel architecture and volume calculation in living donated liver transplantation. Eur Radiol 2004;14:326–33.
  3. Emiroglu R, Coskun M, Yilmaz U, Sevmis S, Ozcay F, Haberal M. Safety of multidetector computed tomography in calculating liver volume for living-donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2006;38:3576–8.
  4. Heymsfield SB, Fulenwider T, Nordlinger B, Barlow R, Sones P, Kutner M. Accurate measurement of liver, kidney, and spleen volume and mass by computerized axial tomography. Ann Intern Med 1979;90:185–7.
  5. Salvalaggio PR, Baker TB, Koffron AJ, Fryer JP, Clark L, Superina RA, et al. Liver graft volume estimation in 100 living donors: measure twice, cut once. Transplantation 2005;80:1181–5.
  6. Radtke A, Sotiropoulos GC, Nadalin S, Molmenti EP, Schroeder T, Lang H, et al. Preoperative volume prediction in adult living donor liver transplantation: how much can we rely on it? Am J Transplant 2007;7:672–9.
  7. Yonemura Y, Taketomi A, Soejima Y, Yoshizumi T, Uchiyama H, Gion T, et al. Validity of preoperative volumetric analysis of congestion volume in living donor liver transplantation using three-dimensional computed tomography. Liver Transpl 2005;11:1556–62.
  8. Li YC, Hu Y, Zhang MM, Jin XQ, Fan X, Pu CL, et al. Usage of 64-detector-row spiral computed tomography volumetry in preoperative volume prediction in living donor liver transplantation in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2011;27:445–9.
  9. Hwang S, Lee SG, Kim KH, Park KM, Ahn CS, Moon DB, et al. Correlation of blood-free graft weight and volumetric graft volume by an analysis of blood content in living donor liver grafts. Transplant Proc 2002;34:3293–4.
  10. Lemke AJ, Brinkmann MJ, Schott T, Niehues SM, Settmacher U, Neuhaus P, et al. Living donor right liver lobes: preoperative CT volumetric measurement for calculation of intraoperative weight and volume. Radiology 2006;240:736–42.