Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of the attitudes of specialist and family physicians regarding rational drug selection

Pages
199–206
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings disclose the need for the rational use of medicine dissemination interventions for all physicians focusing on more effective use of P-drug list.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Physicians’ personal (P) drugs, which were ranked by priority, may show variations even for the same indication.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to evaluate physicians’ knowledge and attitudes regarding P-drug list preparation with respect to the rationaluse of medicine context.METHODS: A total of 1062 family physicians (FPs) and 562 specialist physicians (SPs) were interviewed and questionedabout their knowledge and attitude regarding P-drug list preparation.RESULTS: Compared with SPs (64.9%), significantly more number of FPs (72.8%) prepared a P-drug list.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings disclose the need for the rational use of medicine dissemination interventions for all physicians focusing on more effective use of P-drug list.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Physicians’ personal (P) drugs, which were ranked by priority, may show variations even for the same indication. We aimed to evaluate physicians’ knowledge and attitudes regarding P-drug list preparation with respect to the rationaluse of medicine context.METHODS: A total of 1062 family physicians (FPs) and 562 specialist physicians (SPs) were interviewed and questionedabout their knowledge and attitude regarding P-drug list preparation.RESULTS: Compared with SPs (64.9%), significantly more number of FPs (72.8%) prepared a P-drug list. Women were morelikely to prepare the P-drug list in both groups; gender comparison showed that significantly more number of female FPs(75.9%) exhibited this attitude than female SPs (67.8%) (p=0.002). Among SPs, the trend for P-drug list preparation attitudedecreased with increasing age (p=0.006), and significantly less number of senior physicians showed this attitude comparedwith junior physicians (p=0.007). The most common source of information referred to by FPs (78.9%) and SPs (74.3%) during P-drug list preparation was “pharmaceutical company activities.” More than 80% of responders (80.9% of FPs and 83.6%of SPs) specified that a difference “exists” or “partially exists” between original and generic drugs. Approximately one in 10physicians in both groups stated that they “rarely/never” consider their patients’ “liver/kidney disease” during prescribing.CONCLUSION: More prominently in male and senior physicians, the attitude of P-drug list preparation remained lower thanexpected. Moreover, it is remarkable that pharmaceutical company promotions are the most common source of informationfor drug selection. These findings disclose the need for the rational use of medicine dissemination interventions for all physicians focusing on more effective use of P-drug list.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, V., MOLLAHALİLOĞLU, S., ÖZGÜLCÜ, Ş., ALKAN, A., AKICI, A. (2022). Evaluation of the attitudes of specialist and family physicians regarding rational drug selection. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 199–206. https://ajindex.com/articles/551500

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. World Health Organization. Promoting rational use of medicines: core components. WHO Policy Perspectives on Medicines: Geneva; 2002. Available at: http://archives.who.int/tbs/rational/h3011e.pdf. Accessed May 3, 2018
  2. De Vries TPGM, Henning RH, Hogerzeil HV, Fresle DA. Guide to Good Prescribing – Apractical Manual. WHO/DAP/94.11. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/59001/ WHO_DAP_94.11.pdf;jsessionid=4962B1470FDC15490E60C061 0AD680B3?sequence=1. Accessed May 3, 2018
  3. De Vries TP, Daniels JM, Mulder CW, Groot OA, Wewerinke L, Barnes KI, et al. Should medical students learn to develop a personal formulary? An international, multicentre, randomised controlled study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2008;64:641–6
  4. Akici A, Kalaca S, Goren MZ, Akkan AG, Karaalp A, Demir D, et al. Comparison of rational pharmacotherapy decision-making competence of general practitioners with intern doctors. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2004;60:75–82
  5. Hogerzeil HV, Barnes KI, Henning RH, Kocabasoglu YE, Moller H, Smith AJ, et al. Teachers’ guide to good prescribing. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
  6. Filiz Basaran N, Akici A. Aspects of physicians’ attitudes towards the rational use of drugs at a training and research hospital: a survey study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2013;69:1581–7
  7. Mahajan R, Singh NR, Singh J, Dixit A, Jain A, Gupta A. Current scenario of attitude and knowledge of physicians about rational prescription: A novel cross-sectional study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2010;2:132–6
  8. Robertson J, Fryer JL, O’Connell DL, Smith AJ, Henry DA. Personal formularies. An index of prescribing quality? Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2001;57:333–41
  9. Banjara SK, Bhukya KD. To evaluate awareness of essential medicines, p-drug concept among clinicians in a teaching hospital. International Journal of Scientific Research 2014;9:347–9
  10. Holloway K, van Dijk L. The World Medicines Situation. 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. Available at: http://www. who.int/medicines/areas/policy/world_medicines_situation/WMS_ ch14_wRational.pdf. Accessed May 3, 2018
  11. Skoglund I, Björkelund C, Mehlig K, Gunnarsson R, Möller M. GPs’ opinions of public and industrial information regarding drugs: a crosssectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2011;11:204
  12. Roter DL, Hall JA, Aoki Y. Physician gender effects in medical communication: a meta-analytic review. JAMA 2002;288:756–64
  13. Lieb K, Scheurich A. Contact between doctors and the pharmaceutical industry, their