SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Relationship between brain computed tomography findings and bispectral index score in patients presenting with head trauma

Özlem KÜSKEN
Aysel HUNUK
Tuba Cimilli ÖZTÜRK
Cansu ARSLAN TURAN
Özge Ecmel ONUR
Rohat AK
Ebru Ünal AKOĞLU
Pages
219–225
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The correlation between CT pathology and BIS scores was statistically significant: BIS scores were lower in patients with CTpathologies (p=0.001; p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Head trauma is one of the most important emergency health problems both in the world and in our country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Theobjective in our study is to (i) state the correlation between the findings of bispectral index score (BIS) and computed tomography (CT), which are used to evaluate the level of consciousness of patients with isolated head trauma, and (ii) investigateobjective results about the patient’s level of consiousness/alertness according to the CT modality, which is used frequently.METHODS: This prospective study was carried out between 03.01.2014 and 09.01.2014 in the emergency department ofFatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The correlation between CT pathology and BIS scores was statistically significant: BIS scores were lower in patients with CTpathologies (p=0.001; p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Head trauma is one of the most important emergency health problems both in the world and in our country. Theobjective in our study is to (i) state the correlation between the findings of bispectral index score (BIS) and computed tomography (CT), which are used to evaluate the level of consciousness of patients with isolated head trauma, and (ii) investigateobjective results about the patient’s level of consiousness/alertness according to the CT modality, which is used frequently.METHODS: This prospective study was carried out between 03.01.2014 and 09.01.2014 in the emergency department ofFatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital. The average BIS scores were correlated with the Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS) point, the Canadian CT Head Rule major and minor criteria, and the pathologic findings in CT imaging. The patients’demographic features, vital signs at admission, and arrival times at the hospital were investigated.RESULTS: In our study, 64 (31.7%) patients were female, and 138 (68.3%) patients were male. The mean BIS scoreswere 84.99±11.20 (86.05) and 93.78±3.80 (95.05) in patients with and without CT pathologies, respectively. The correlation between CT pathology and BIS scores was statistically significant: BIS scores were lower in patients with CTpathologies (p=0.001; p

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜSKEN, Ö., HUNUK, A., ÖZTÜRK, T. C., TURAN, C. A., ONUR, Ö. E., AK, R., AKOĞLU, E. Ü. (2022). Relationship between brain computed tomography findings and bispectral index score in patients presenting with head trauma. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 219–225. https://ajindex.com/articles/551486

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Silav G, Uğur HÇ, Tun K, Attar A, Egemen N. The Systemic Effects of Head Traumas. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 2000;53:293–7
  2. Franco-Koehrlen CA, Iglesias-Leboreiro J, Bernárdez-Zapata I, Rendón-Macías ME. Clinical decision to perform cranial computed tomography in children with non-severe head injury. [Article in Spanish]. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 2015;72:169–73. [CrossRef ] 3. Yurtseven A, Altıntop İ, Bayram MK, Kaynak MF, Danlı N. Are We Overuse Computerized Tomography In Emergency Department? Journal of Anatolian Medical Research 2016;1:1-6
  3. Stiell IG, Clement CM, Rowe BH, Schull MJ, Brison R, Cass D, et al. Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria in patients with minor head injury. JAMA 2005;294:1511–8
  4. Bombacı E, Boztepe A, Çizen A, Çevik Z, Çolakoğlu S, Yollu Atakan T. Bilinci kapalı yoğun bakım hastalarında bispektral indeks monitörizasyonu ile modifiye Glasgow koma ve Ramsay sedasyon skala puanları arasındaki ilişki. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi 2005:1
  5. Sharp AL, Nagaraj G, Rippberger EJ, Shen E, Swap CJ, Silver MA, et al. Computed Tomography Use for Adults With Head Injury: Describing Likely AvoidableEmergency Department Imaging Based on the Canadian CT Head Rule. Acad Emerg Med 2017;24:22–30. [CrossRef ] 7. Alewander RH, Proctor HJ. Head Travma. In: Advanced Travma Life Support. 3th ed. Chicago, USA: Americen Collage of Surgeons; 1993. p. 159–83
  6. Saiki RL. Current and evolving management of traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2009;21:549–59. [CrossRef ] 9. Paşaoğlu A. Erişkinde Kafa Travmaları. In: Temel Nöroşirürji Cilt I. Ankara: Türk Nöroşirürji Derneği Yayınları; 2005. p. 316–23
  7. Sabuncuoğlu H. Trafik kazaları ve istatistiklerle Türkiye gerçeği. Nörotravma ve Yoğun Bakım 2009;4:11–5
  8. Beyaztaş FY, Alagözlü H. The Evaluation Of The Traffic Accident Cases Applying To The Emergency Department Of The Hospital Of The Cumhuriyet Unıversity In 1998. Ulus Travma Derg 2002;8:29– 33
  9. Altıntop L, Güven H, Doğanay Z, ve arkadaşları. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi acil servis trafik kazası hastalarının değerlendirilmesi. Samsun: Trafik 2000 Sempozyumu; 22–23 Mayıs 2000
  10. Servadei F, Merry GS. Mild head injury in adults. In: Winn HR, editor. Youmans Neurological Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004. p. 5065–81
  11. Hsiang JN, Yeung T, Yu AL, Poon WS. High-risk mild head injury. J Neurosurg 1997;87:234–8. [CrossRef ] 15. Dikmen SS, Levin HS. Methodological