The correlation between TIS and BBS wasconsiderably high in the validity analysis (p
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk impairment scale (TIS), used in theevaluation of somatic, motor, and coordination disturbances in stroke patients, and provide a culturally adapted version foruse in the Turkish population.METHODS: A total of 80 patients who were either hospitalized at our facility and rehabilitated for stroke or admitted at ouroutpatient clinics were included in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Reliability was evaluated by the internal consistency (Cronbach α) and testreproducibility [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICCC)] methods, and validity was evaluated by the correlation betweensubgroups and the total scores of the TIS and Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Brunnstrom phases, Barthel index (BI), Rivermeadmobility index (RMI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores.RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 63.00±12.1 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The correlation between TIS and BBS wasconsiderably high in the validity analysis (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk impairment scale (TIS), used in theevaluation of somatic, motor, and coordination disturbances in stroke patients, and provide a culturally adapted version foruse in the Turkish population.METHODS: A total of 80 patients who were either hospitalized at our facility and rehabilitated for stroke or admitted at ouroutpatient clinics were included in this study. Reliability was evaluated by the internal consistency (Cronbach α) and testreproducibility [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICCC)] methods, and validity was evaluated by the correlation betweensubgroups and the total scores of the TIS and Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Brunnstrom phases, Barthel index (BI), Rivermeadmobility index (RMI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores.RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 63.00±12.1 years. Out of a total of 80 subjects, 34 were female and 46 weremale. The reliability of the scale was evaluated by the internal consistency, inter- and intra-observer reliability, and test reproducibility. The findings showed that the Turkish form of the scale was reliable at a good level. The test values were as follows;Cronbach α: >0.70, ICCC: 0.969–1, subgroups and total score comparison: 0. The correlation between TIS and BBS wasconsiderably high in the validity analysis (p
🔖
Cite This Article
DOĞU, B., KURAN, B., SAĞ, M. S., ŞAHİN, F., SAG, S., BÜYÜKAVCI, R. (2022). Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 156–165. https://ajindex.com/articles/551460
Wade DT, Skilbeck CE, Hewer RL. Predicting Barthel ADL score at 6 months after an acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983;64:24–8
Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke 1990;21:78–81. [CrossRef ] 3. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Van de Winckel A, De Weerdt W. Clinical tools to measure trunk performance after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil 2007;21:387–94. [CrossRef ] 4. Verheyden G, Willems AM, Ooms L, Nieuwboer A. Validity of the trunk impairment scale as a measure of trunk performance in people with Parkinson’s disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:1304–8
Verheyden G, Nuyens G, Nieuwboer A, Van Asch P, Ketelaer P, De Weerdt W. Reliability and validity of trunk assessment for people with multiple sclerosis. Phys Ther 2006;86:66–76. [CrossRef ] 6. Pham HP, Eidem A, Hansen G, Nyquist A, Vik T, Sæther R. Validity and Responsiveness of the Trunk Impairment Scale and Trunk ControlMeasurement Scale in Young Individuals with Cerebral Palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2016;36:440–52. [CrossRef ] 7. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98. [CrossRef ] 8. Güngen C, Ertan T, Eker E, Yaşar R, Engin F. Standardize Mini Mental Test’in Türk Toplumunda Hafif Demans Tanısında Geçerlik ve Güvenilirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Derg 2002;13:273–81
Küçükdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Tennant A, Süldür N, Sonel B, Arasil T. Adaptation of the modified Barthel Index for use in physical medicine and rehabilitationin Turkey. Scand J Rehabil Med 2000;32:87–92
Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey Update. In: Maruish ME, editor. The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment. 3rd ed. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2004. p. 693– 718
Demirsoy C. The MOS-SF 36 health survey: A validation studt with a Turkish sample. [Master Thesis]. İstanbul: Boğaziçi University; 1999
Ohene-Frempong K, Weiner SJ, Sleeper LA, Miller ST, Embury S, Moohr JW, et al. Cerebrovascular accidents in sickle cell disease: rates and risk factors. Blood 1998;91:288–94
Wade DT. Personal physical disability. In: Wade DT, editör. Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Pres; 1992. p. 71–82
Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud