Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Assessment of health-promoting lifestyle behaviors of adults living in the semi-rural area

Pages
13–20
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Educational programs should beprepared in these issues by determining the issues that individuals are lacking in protecting and developing their health andsocial needs should be taken into consideration when these programs are being prepared.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to determine the level of healthy lifestyle behaviors and related factors in theindividuals who applied to the primary health-care center.METHODS: The study is a cross-sectional study of adults aged 18 years and over who applied to the primary health-carecenter.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample size of the study was calculated as 992 people and 995 participants were accessible.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Educational programs should beprepared in these issues by determining the issues that individuals are lacking in protecting and developing their health andsocial needs should be taken into consideration when these programs are being prepared.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to determine the level of healthy lifestyle behaviors and related factors in theindividuals who applied to the primary health-care center.METHODS: The study is a cross-sectional study of adults aged 18 years and over who applied to the primary health-carecenter. The sample size of the study was calculated as 992 people and 995 participants were accessible. The health-promoting behaviors of the individuals were assessed by the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II). In the analysis of thedata, Mann–Whitney U-test, Kruskal–Wallis tests, and multiple linear regression analysis were used to determine effectivevariables on scale score.RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 43.8±17.1. Of the total participants, 45.7% (n=455) of them were female.The median score obtained from the HPLP-II was 132. Health responsibility, nutrition, and interpersonal relations subscalescores of male were lower than female patients, while physical activity subscale scores were higher in male patients. In participants under the age of 48 years in the study, health responsibility, nutrition, interpersonal relations, and stress managementsubscale scores were higher. The scores of the married participants were higher than the areas out of the stress managementsubdimension. Stress management subscale scores were higher in individuals with primary and lower education levels interms of health care, nutrition, and interpersonal relations. Those who had good family income status and health perceptionscores also received higher scores in terms of all subscale scores.CONCLUSION: Gender, age group, marital status, education level, income level, physician-diagnosed chronic disease history, and perceived health status were found to be related to health-promoting behaviors. Educational programs should beprepared in these issues by determining the issues that individuals are lacking in protecting and developing their health andsocial needs should be taken into consideration when these programs are being prepared.

🔖

Cite This Article

EMİRAL, G. Ö., AYGAR, H., METİNTAS, S., ALAİYE, M., ZENCİRCİ, S. A., ISİKLİ, B., ONSUZ, M. F., SOYSAL, A. (2022). Assessment of health-promoting lifestyle behaviors of adults living in the semi-rural area. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 13–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/551453

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. İlhan N, Batmaz M, Akhan L U, Üniversite öğrencilerinin sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışları. Maltepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Bilim ve Sanatı Dergisi 2010;3:34–44
  2. Noncommunicable diseases and their risk factors. Available at: http:// www.who.int/ncds/introduction/en/. Accessed Jan 01, 2017
  3. The European Health Report 2002. Copenhagen, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. European Series, No
  4. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/98296/ E76907.pdf. Accessed Jan 18, 2019
  5. Fleming P, Godwin M. Lifestyle interventions in primary care: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Can Fam Physician 2008;54:1706–13
  6. Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. The Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile: development and psychometric characteristics. Nurs Res 1987;36:76–81. [CrossRef ] 6. Zaybak A, Fadıloğlu Ç. Determining of the health promotion behaviors of university students and the factors affecting these behaviors. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 2004;20:77–95
  7. Stampfer MJ, Hu FB, Manson JE, Rimm EB, Willett WC. Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through diet and lifestyle. N Engl J Med 2000;343:16–22. [CrossRef ] 8. Chiuve SE, McCullough ML, Sacks FM, Rimm EB. Healthy lifestyle factors in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease among men: benefits among users and nonusers of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medications. Circulation 2006;114:160–7. [CrossRef ] 9. Küçükberber N, Özdilli K, Yorulmaz H. Evaluation of factors affecting healthy life style behaviors and quality of life in patients with heart disease. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2011;11:619–26. [CrossRef ] 10. Loef M, Walach H. The combined effects of healthy lifestyle behaviors on all cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 2012;55:163–70. [CrossRef ] 11. World Health Organization. Health21: The health for all policy framework for the WHO European Region. Available at: http://www.euro. who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/98398/wa540ga199heeng.pdf. Accessed Jan 18, 2019
  8. King DE, Mainous AG 3rd, Carnemolla M, Everett CJ. Adherence to healthy lifestyle habits in US adults, 1988-2006. Am J Med 2009;122:528–34. [CrossRef ] 13. Walker SN, Hill-Polerecky DM. Psychometric evaluation of the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II. Unpublished manuscript. University of Nebraska Medical Center; 1996
  9. Mirghafourvand M, Baheiraei A, Nedjat S, Mohammadi E, Charandabi SM, Majdzadeh R.