Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Familial association of keratoconus and granular corneal dystrophy: The familial case series

Pages
176–183
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreresearch is required to further explain this association.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the coexistence of bilateral keratoconus and granular cornealdystrophy (GCD) in the members of a family.METHODS: A total of 22 patients were examined in four generations of the family tree in this family screening study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Corneal topography was performed on the patients diagnosedwith granular dystrophy and other family members aged >5 years with normal examination findings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreresearch is required to further explain this association.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the coexistence of bilateral keratoconus and granular cornealdystrophy (GCD) in the members of a family.METHODS: A total of 22 patients were examined in four generations of the family tree in this family screening study. Visualacuity test, biomicroscopic examination, and fundus examination were performed in all patients. The diagnosis of granulardystrophy was based on biomicroscopic examination findings. Corneal topography was performed on the patients diagnosedwith granular dystrophy and other family members aged >5 years with normal examination findings. Corneal photographswere obtained from all patients with granular dystrophy except one case.RESULTS: Keratoconus or subclinical keratoconus was detected in seven cases. In addition, GCD type 1 was found in six ofthe seven cases. All patients diagnosed with keratoconus and granular dystrophy were females. On the other hand, there wasno ophthalmologic problem in the men of the family tree. Although an autosomal dominant inheritance was found, the onsetof the disease only in women suggests that there may be a variant expression.CONCLUSION: The present study showed an association of GCD and keratoconus in four generations of a family. Moreresearch is required to further explain this association.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAVDAR, M., SAVACI, S. S., CANKAYA, C., GÜNDÜZ, A., CUMURCU, T., DEMİREL, S. (2022). Familial association of keratoconus and granular corneal dystrophy: The familial case series. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 176–183. https://ajindex.com/articles/551446

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Chang SW, Tuli S, Azar DT. Corneal dystrophies. In: Traboulsi EI, editor. Genetic diseases of the eye. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 217–66
  2. Wollensak G, Green WR, Temprano J. Keratoconus associated with corneal granular dystrophy in a patient of Italian origin. Cornea 2002;21:121–2. [CrossRef ] 3. Collin HB, Hendicott PL. Granular dystrophy of the cornea. Clin Exp Optom 1999;82:203–6. [CrossRef ] 4. Møller HU. Granular corneal dystrophy Groenouw type I. Clinical and genetic aspects. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 1991:1–40
  3. Haddad R, Font RL, Fine BS. Unusual superficial variant of granular dystrophy of the cornea. Am J Ophthalmol 1977;83:213–8. [CrossRef ] 6. Romero-Jiménez M, Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS. Keratoconus: a review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010;33:157–66. [CrossRef ] 7. Nowak DM, Gajecka M. The genetics of keratoconus. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2011;18:2–6. [CrossRef ] 8. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998;42:297–319
  4. Sassani JW, Smith SG, Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus and bilateral lattice-granular corneal dystrophies. Cornea 1992;11:343–50. [CrossRef ] 10. Vajpayee RB, Snibson GR, Taylor HR. Association of keratoconus with granular corneal dystrophy. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1996;24:369–71
  5. Cremona FA, Ghosheh FR, Rapuano CJ, Eagle RC Jr, Hammersmith KM, Laibson PR, et al. Keratoconus associated with other corneal dystrophies. Cornea 2009;28:127–35. [CrossRef ] 12. Igarashi S, Makita Y, Hikichi T, Mori F, Hanada K, Yoshida A. Association of keratoconus and Avellino corneal dystrophy. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:367–8. [CrossRef ] 13. Rathi VM, Vemuganti GK, Sangwan VS, Kannabiran C. Late occurrence of granular dystrophy in bilateral keratoconus: penetrating keratoplasty and long-term follow-up. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011;59:398– 400. [CrossRef ] 14. Mitsui M, Sakimoto T, Sawa M, Katami M. Familial case of keratoconus with corneal granular dystrophy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1998;42:385–8
  6. Uçakhan ÖÖ, Cetinkor V, Özkan M, Kanpolat A. Evaluation of Scheimpflug imaging parameters in subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus, and normal eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:1116–24
  7. Li X, Rabinowitz YS, Rasheed K, Yang H. Longitudinal study of the normal eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients. Ophthalmology 2004;111:440–6. [CrossRef ] 17. Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW. Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol 1984;28:293–322. [CrossRef ] 18. Shapiro MB, France TD. The ocu