Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6

Does using different entrance points for intramedullarynails affect clinical outcomes for femoral shaftfractures? A retrospective clinical comparative study

Pages
609–618
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Together, our results show that the use of nails via TFE may represent a safer option for surgical treatment of supra-isthmal fractures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: We examined the clinical and radiological outcomes of femoral shaft fractures treated with two different intramedullary nail designs using either greater trochanteric or trochanteric fossa entrance.METHODS: The medical records of patients undergoing operations for a shaft fracture either with a nail with trochanteric entrance or trochanteric fossa entrance were retrospectively reviewed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Inclusion criteria were: having the necessary medical records including radiographic images and follow-up data, at least 12 months of follow-up, skeletal maturity (≥16 years of age) not having osteoporosis (≤60 years of age).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Together, our results show that the use of nails via TFE may represent a safer option for surgical treatment of supra-isthmal fractures.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined the clinical and radiological outcomes of femoral shaft fractures treated with two different intramedullary nail designs using either greater trochanteric or trochanteric fossa entrance.METHODS: The medical records of patients undergoing operations for a shaft fracture either with a nail with trochanteric entrance or trochanteric fossa entrance were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: having the necessary medical records including radiographic images and follow-up data, at least 12 months of follow-up, skeletal maturity (≥16 years of age) not having osteoporosis (≤60 years of age). Exclusion criteria were: pathological fractures, fragility fractures, fractures that extend to hip or knee joint capsule, lack of enough medical data, less than 12 months of follow up, and patients yet to reach skeletal maturity.RESULTS: A total of 65 patients (67 femur fractures) were treated with intramedullary nails using a trochanteric fossa entrance (TFE) and 21 patients (23 femur fractures) were treated with nails using a greater trochanteric entrance (GTE). No statistically significant differences were evident between groups in terms of union time, blood loss, need for implant removal, implant failure, or revision operation. However, the duration of postoperative hospitalization was significantly shorter in the GTE nail group and the need for open reduction of the fracture was less common in these patients. Although there were no significant differences between groups in terms of complications and union among isthmal and infra-isthmal fractures, malreduction and iatrogenic fractures were more common with the use of GTE nails for treatment of supra-isthmal fractures.CONCLUSION: Use of intramedullary nails via both GTE and TFE were safe and efficient for the treatment of isthmal and infra-isthmal fractures. However, varus malalignments associated with iatrogenic fractures were more common with trochanteric entrance nails. Together, our results show that the use of nails via TFE may represent a safer option for surgical treatment of supra-isthmal fractures.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖYLEMEZ, M. S., ÖZ, T. T. (2022). Does using different entrance points for intramedullarynails affect clinical outcomes for femoral shaftfractures? A retrospective clinical comparative study. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6, 609–618. https://ajindex.com/articles/551424

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ricci WM, Devinney S, Haidukewych G, Herscovici D, Sanders R. Trochanteric nail insertion for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2005;19:511–7
  2. Winquist RA, Hansen ST Jr, Clawson DK. Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:529–39
  3. Stannard JP, Bankston L, Futch LA, McGwin G, Volgas DA. Functional outcome following intramedullary nailing of the femur: a prospective randomized comparison of piriformis fossa and greater trochanteric entry portals. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:1385–91
  4. Sheth U, Gohal C, Chahal J, Nauth A, Dwyer T. Comparing Entry Points for Antegrade Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures. Orthopedics 2016;39:e43–50
  5. Ansari Moein CM, Verhofstad MH, Bleys RL, van der Werken C. Soft tissue anatomy around the hip and its implications for choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing. Clin Anat 2008;21:568–74
  6. Schwieger K, Moein CA, Bösl O, Verhofstad M. Lateral insertion points in antegrade femoral nailing and their influence on femoral bone strains. AO Dev News 2007;1:48–9
  7. Ricci WM, Schwappach J, Tucker M, Coupe K, Brandt A, Sanders R, et al. Trochanteric versus piriformis entry portal for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20:663–7
  8. Tucker MC, Schwappach JR, Leighton RK, Coupe K, Ricci WM. Results of femoral intramedullary nailing in patients who are obese versus those who are not obese: a prospective multicenter comparison study. J Orthop Trauma 2007;21:523–9
  9. Ha SH, Kim WH, Lee GC. Results of intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fracturetrochanteric entry portal (Sirus nail) versus piriformis entry portal (M/DN nail). J Korean Fract Soc 2014;27:50–7
  10. Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma 2018;32 Suppl 1:S1–170
  11. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:453–8
  12. Linke B, Ansari Moein C, Bösl O, Verhofstad MH, van der Werken C, Schwieger K, et al. Lateral insertion points in antegrade femoral nailing and their influence on femoral bone strains. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:716–22
  13. Prasarn ML, Cattaneo MD, Achor T, Ahn J, Klinger CE, Helfet DL, et al. The effect of entry point on malalignment and iatrogenic fracture with the Synthes