Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Dermoscopy of stage llA mycosis fungoides

Pages
174–179
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Orange-yellow and white patches, short, fine and linear vessels, geometric and perifollicular white scalesmay be useful in distinguishing stage IIA MF from PP by hand-held dermoscopy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Differential diagnosis of mycosis fungoides (MF) in the early stages can be challenging.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study aims to evaluate the dermoscopic findings of stage IIA MF in comparisonwith plaque psoriasis (PP).METHODS: Thirty-four patients aged between 16-70 years with stage IIA MF (n=17) and PP (n=17) were evaluated in thisprospective study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Orange-yellow and white patches, short, fine and linear vessels, geometric and perifollicular white scalesmay be useful in distinguishing stage IIA MF from PP by hand-held dermoscopy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Differential diagnosis of mycosis fungoides (MF) in the early stages can be challenging. Dermoscopy has beenreported to be useful in the evaluation of early MF. However, to our knowledge, there is no study that specifies these earlystages as stage IA, IB or IIA. The present study aims to evaluate the dermoscopic findings of stage IIA MF in comparisonwith plaque psoriasis (PP).METHODS: Thirty-four patients aged between 16-70 years with stage IIA MF (n=17) and PP (n=17) were evaluated in thisprospective study. Dermoscopic examinations were performed by manual dermatoscopy (Dermlite DL4). χ2 test was used.RESULTS: In patients with stage IIA MF, orange-yellow patches (88.2%), short, fine and linear vessels (82.3%), geometric white scales (70.5%), perifollicular white scales (47%) and white patches (35.2%) were common, while dotted vessels(94.1%), diffuse lamellar white scales (88.2%) and dotted and globular vessels (70.5%) were common in patients with PP.Although spermatozoa-like structures, purpuric dots, collarette white scales and Y-shaped arborizing vessels were commonin patients with MF, this was not statistically significant. Geometric white scales (clinically; cigarette paper-like wrinkly scales)correlated with alternating parakeratosis and orthokeratosis in the stratum corneum histopathologically.CONCLUSION: A unique aspect of our study is that this study provides insights about the importance of scales in differentiating MF from PP. Orange-yellow and white patches, short, fine and linear vessels, geometric and perifollicular white scalesmay be useful in distinguishing stage IIA MF from PP by hand-held dermoscopy.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, M. K., ZİNDANCI, İ., ZEMHERİ, E. (2022). Dermoscopy of stage llA mycosis fungoides. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 174–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/551336

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Piccolo V, Russo T, Agozzino M, Vitiello P, Caccavale S, Alfano R, et al. Dermoscopy of Cutaneous Lymphoproliferative Disorders: Where Are We Now? Dermatology 2018;234:131–6
  2. Bombonato C, Pampena R, Lallas A, Giovanni P, Longo C. Dermoscopy of Lymphomas and Pseudolymphomas. Dermatol Clin 2018;36:377–88
  3. Bunn PA Jr, Lamberg SI. Report of the Committee on Staging and Classification of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas. Cancer Treat Rep 1979;63:725–8
  4. Olsen E, Vonderheid E, Pimpinelli N, Willemze R, Kim Y, Knobler R, et al; ISCL/EORTC. Revisions to the staging and classification of mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome: a proposal of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL) and the cutaneous lymphoma task force of the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Blood 2007;110:1713–22
  5. Trautinger F, Eder J, Assaf C, Bagot M, Cozzio A, Dummer R, et al. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus recommendations for the treatment of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome - Update 2017. Eur J Cancer 2017;77:57–74
  6. Toncic RJ, Drvar DL, Bradamante M, Rados J, Jerkovic-Gulin S, Caccavale S, et al. Early dermoscopic sign of folliculotropism in patients with mycosis fungoides. Dermatol Pract Concept 2018;8:328–29
  7. Xu C, Liu J, Wang T, Luo Y, Liu Y. Dermoscopic patterns of earlystage mycosis fungoides in a Chinese population. Clin Exp Dermatol 2019;44:169–75
  8. Ghahramani GK, Goetz KE, Liu V. Dermoscopic characterization of cutaneous lymphomas: a pilot survey. Int J Dermatol 2018;57:339–43
  9. Xu P, Tan C. Dermoscopy of poikilodermatous mycosis fungoides (MF). J Am Acad Dermatol 2016;74:e45–7
  10. Bosseila M, Sayed Sayed K, El-Din Sayed SS, Abd El Monaem NA. Evaluation of Angiogenesis in Early Mycosis Fungoides Patients: Dermoscopic and Immunohistochemical Study. Dermatology 2015;231:82–6
  11. Lallas A, Apalla Z, Lefaki I, Tzellos T, Karatolias A, Sotiriou E, et al. Dermoscopy of early stage mycosis fungoides. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013;27:617–21
  12. Morariu SH, Rotaru M, Vartolomei MD, Turcu M, Chiotoroiu AL, Suciu M, et al. Pagetoid reticulosis Woringer-Kolopp type, a particular variant of mycosis fungoides: a case report. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2014;55:1469–72
  13. Lallas A, Kyrgidis A, Tzellos TG, Apalla Z, Karakyriou E, Karatolias A, et al. Accuracy of dermoscopic criteria for the diagnosis of psoriasis, dermatitis, lichen planus and pityriasis rosea. Br J Dermatol 2012;166:1198–205.