Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

The evaluation of patients with optic disc edema: A retrospective study

Pages
280–285
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The early diagnosis with fundoscopic examination may increase visual acuity in these patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Optic disc edema is among major problems that neuro-ophthalmology clinics encounter.
📊
Key Findings & Data:RESULTS: There were 77 female and 23 male patients in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The early diagnosis with fundoscopic examination may increase visual acuity in these patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Optic disc edema is among major problems that neuro-ophthalmology clinics encounter. We intended to analyze patients with optic disc edema in this article. METHODS: Data related to the main complaint, associated systemic disease, visual acuity, characteristics of optic disc swelling, other ocular findings, topical or systemic drugs, treatment methods, follow-up examination, and related data of the patients were obtained retrospectively. RESULTS: There were 77 female and 23 male patients in the study. Optic disc edema was detected bilaterally in 65 patients, unilaterally in 35 patients. The duration of the symptoms until the first application was 19.82±17.18 (0–90) days. There were no systemic disorders in 74 patients but diabetes mellitus in 11 patients, hypertension in four patients, coronary artery disease in three patients, urticaria in two patients, lymphoma in one, multiple sclerosis in one patient, mastoiditis in one patient, scleroderma in one, and pregnancy in two patients were detected. While 93 patients had no additional ocular findings, 2 had uveitis, 1 had corneal dystrophy, 1 had keratoconus, 1 had cataract, 1 had previous cataract surgery, and 1 had peripheral retinal degenerations. The major etiology of the optic disc edema was idiopathic intracranial hypertension, which was detected in 44 patients. In all these patients, bilateral optic disc edema was observed and 43 patients were given oral acetazolamide and one patient oral topiramate. CONCLUSION: The presence of optic nerve edema should be absolutely evaluated in patients presenting with symptoms of vision loss and increased intracranial pressure. The early diagnosis with fundoscopic examination may increase visual acuity in these patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

Guler, M., Urfalioglu, S., Ozdemir, G., Duman, G. G. (2022). The evaluation of patients with optic disc edema: A retrospective study. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 280–285. https://ajindex.com/articles/551273

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Selhorst JB, Chen Y. The optic nerve. Semin Neurol. 2009 Feb;29(1):29- 35
  2. Ehlers JP, Shah CP, Fenton GL, Hoskins EN, Shelsta HN. Papilledema. In: The Wills Eye Manual: Office and Emergency Room Diagnosis and Treatment of Eye Disease. 5th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 252–4
  3. Schirmer CM, Hedges TR 3rd. Mechanisms of visual loss in papilledema. Neurosurg Focus 2007;23:E5
  4. Van Stavern GP. Optic disc edema. Semin Neurol 2007;27:233–43
  5. Owler BK, Parker G, Halmagyi GM, Johnston IH, Besser M, Pickard JD, et al. Cranial venous outflow obstruction and pseudotumor Cerebri syndrome. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2005;30:107–74
  6. Friedman DI. The pseudotumor cerebri syndrome. Neurol Clin 2014;32:363–96
  7. Orefice G, Celentano L, Scaglione M, Davoli M, Striano S. Radioisotopic cisternography in benign intracranial hypertension of young obese women. A seven-case study and pathogenetic suggestions. Acta Neurol (Napoli) 1992;14:39–50
  8. Huna-Baron R, Landau K, Rosenberg M, Warren FA, Kupersmith MJ. Unilateral swollen disc due to increased intracranial pressure. Neurology 2001;56:1588–90
  9. Friedman DI. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2007;11:62–8
  10. Wall M. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurol Clin 2010;28:593–617
  11. Roberts PA, Pollay M, Engles C, Pendleton B, Reynolds E, Stevens FA. Effect on intracranial pressure of furosemide combined with varying doses and administration rates of mannitol. J Neurosurg 1987;66:440– 6
  12. Johnson LN, Krohel GB, Madsen RW, March GA Jr. The role of weight loss and acetazolamide in the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri). Ophthalmology 1998;105:2313–7
  13. Wong R, Madill SA, Pandey P, Riordan-Eva P. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the association between weight loss and the requirement for systemic treatment. BMC Ophthalmol 2007;7:15
  14. Jenkins TM, Toosy AT. Optic neuritis: the eye as a window to the brain. Curr Opin Neurol 2017;30:61–6
  15. Jenkins TM, Toosy AT. New developments in the treatment of optic neuritis. Eye Brain 2010;2:83–94
  16. Optic Neuritis Study Group. Multiple sclerosis risk after optic neuritis: final optic neuritis treatment trial follow-up. Arch Neurol 2008;65:727–32
  17. Agostoni E, Frigerio R, Protti A. Controversies in optic neuritis pain diagnosis. Neurol Sci 2005;26 Suppl 2:s75–8
  18. Beck RW, Trobe JD, Moke PS, Gal RL, Xing D, Bhatti MT, et al; Optic Neuritis Study Group. High- and low