Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Thematic development of research on patient safety: An analysis with the science mapping technique

Pages
188–196
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This approach facilitates a person’’s understanding of a complex research topic such as patient safety and ensures that they are aware of new research directions or alternative research priorities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A large amount of scientific literature is forcing those who want to study the subject deeply.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data of 8372 articles obtained from the Web of Science database were analyzed with SciMAT2 software.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This approach facilitates a person’’s understanding of a complex research topic such as patient safety and ensures that they are aware of new research directions or alternative research priorities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A large amount of scientific literature is forcing those who want to study the subject deeply. In general, the number of articles available exceeds thousands. It has become challenging both to dominate the current concept and to see the relationships between the developments that feed the concept. Visualization techniques based on bibliometric data help to gain an overview of the literature on complex research topics. The aim of this study is to examine the topic of “patient safety” with a bibliometric analysis program. The data of 8372 articles obtained from the Web of Science database were analyzed with SciMAT2 software. Before the analysis, general findings regarding the raw data were brought to the fore. The strategic diagram and thematic development map have been analyzed in terms of 10-year periods covering the past 30 years. Five motor themes (“contrast agent,” “adverse events,” “program,” “safety,” “prostatectomy”) were identified in 1990-1999, four motor themes (“infection control,” “hospital-acquired infections,” “adverse drug events,” “culture”) in 2000-2009 and nine motor themes (“patient safety,” “education,” “climate,” “system,” “mortality,” “operating room,” “validity,” “burnout,” “primary care”) in 2010-2019. The number of motor themes increased during the period and adverse events, which were the active subjects of the early periods, were replaced by new concepts (such as climate, primary care, and burnout) over time. Bibliometric visualization tools make it possible to analyze the literature consisting of a large number of articles. This approach facilitates a person’’s understanding of a complex research topic such as patient safety and ensures that they are aware of new research directions or alternative research priorities.

🔖

Cite This Article

PALTEKİ, T., BEYLİK, U. (2022). Thematic development of research on patient safety: An analysis with the science mapping technique. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 188–196. https://ajindex.com/articles/551201

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Rodrigues SP, van Eck NJ, Waltman L, Jansen FW. Mapping patient safety: a large-scale literature review using bibliometric visualisation techniques. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004468
  2. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000
  3. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001
  4. World Health Organization. A World Alliance for safer Health Care. Conceptual Framework for the International Classification for Patient Safety, Final Technical Report, January 2009. Available at: http://www. who.int/patientsafety/taxonomy/ICPS_Statement_of_Purpose.pdf Accessed Mar 07, 2021
  5. Huang HC, Wang CH, Chen PC, Lee YD. Bibliometric analysis of medication errors and adverse drug events studies. J Patient Saf 2019;15:128–34
  6. Whipple EC, Dixon BE, McGowan JJ. Linking health information technology to patient safety and quality outcomes: a bibliometric analysis and review. Inform Health Soc Care 2013;38:1–14
  7. Damiani G, Sommella L, Pinnarelli L, Scopelliti L, Ricciardi W. The ongoing tendencies in the field of patient safety and risk management techniques: a world-wide bibliometric research from 1990 up to the present. European Journal of Public Health. 2007;17:197–8
  8. Dutra DD, Duarte MCS, Albuquerque KF, Santos JS, Simões KM, Araruna PC. Adverse events in intensive care units: bibliometric study. Revista de Pesquisa: Cuidado é Fundamental Online 2017;9:669–75. 9. van Nunen K, Li J, Reniers G, Ponnet K. Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research. Safety Science 2018;108:248–58
  9. Tao J, Yang F, Qiu D, Reniers G. Analysis of safety leadership using a science mapping approach. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2020;140:244–57
  10. Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics 2011;5:146–66
  11. Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2012;63:1609–30
  12. Cobo MJ, Martínez MÁ, Gutiérrez-Salcedo M, Fujita H, Herrera