Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

The frequency of acceptance of oral glucose tolerance test in Turkish pregnant women: A single tertiary center results

Pages
140–148
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall frequency of GDM was approximately 15.2% (n=34).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: It is thought that there is not enough data about the frequency of acceptance of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in Turkish pregnant women.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: The data of non-diabetic 344 pregnant women seen at the Obstetrics Clinic of our hospital between September 2016 and September 2017 were obtained from the hospital records.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall frequency of GDM was approximately 15.2% (n=34).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It is thought that there is not enough data about the frequency of acceptance of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in Turkish pregnant women. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of acceptance of OGTT among participants in our single tertiary center. METHODS: The data of non-diabetic 344 pregnant women seen at the Obstetrics Clinic of our hospital between September 2016 and September 2017 were obtained from the hospital records. Women who did not have regular follow-up during pregnancy were excluded. One of the two or one-step approaches was used in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) depending on the choice of the physician following the patient. RESULTS: There were 223 subjects eligible for the study. One hundred seventy-seven pregnant women (79.4%) accepted to do OGTT. We determined that 46 women (20.6%) did not complete at least one OGTT, of whom 74% (n=34) never completed the recommended screening test in this cohort. The overall frequency of GDM was approximately 15.2% (n=34). OGTT acceptability was higher among pregnant women with university graduates (p=0.02). Adverse pregnancy outcomes were similar between the accepted and rejected groups. Among the reasons for OGTT rejection, the media had a significant influence (n=35). CONCLUSION: Our results show that a significant percentage of patients refused to do OGTT. Therefore the actual frequency of pregnant women with GDM could not be determined. One way to increase compliance may be recommending only the one-step test for pregnant women in countries with a high rejection rate of OGTT.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖNENLİ, M. G., NALBANTOĞLU, E. A., YERLİKAYA, A., CANBAZ, H. B., BEKDEMİR, B., SEZER, H., YAZICI, D., ATA, B. (2022). The frequency of acceptance of oral glucose tolerance test in Turkish pregnant women: A single tertiary center results. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 140–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/551187

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH. Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1862–8
  2. Hadden DR. A historical perspective on gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998;21 Suppl 2:B3–4
  3. Retnakaran R, Qi Y, Connelly PW, Sermer M, Zinman B, Hanley AJ. Glucose intolerance in pregnancy and postpartum risk of metabolic syndrome in young women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:670–7
  4. Petry CJ. Gestational diabetes: risk factors and recent advances in its genetics and treatment. Br J Nutr 2010;104:775–87
  5. American Diabetes Association. 2. classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 2020;43:S14–31
  6. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel, Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010;33:676–82
  7. World Health Organization. Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycemia first detected in pregnancy; 2013. Available at: https:// apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/85975. Accessed Mar 01, 2022
  8. Turkey Endocrinology and Metabolism Society Study and Training Group. Diabetes Mellitus, and Complications, Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up Guide. 14th ed. Ankara: TEMD; 2020
  9. Satman I, Omer B, Tutuncu Y, Kalaca S, Gedik S, Dinccag N, et al; TURDEP-II Study Group. Twelve-year trends in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and prediabetes in Turkish adults. Eur J Epidemiol 2013;28:169–80
  10. Cade TJ, Polyakov A, Brennecke SP. Implications of the introduction of new criteria for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes: a health outcome and cost of care analysis. BMJ Open 2019;9:e023293
  11. Sexton H, Heal C, Banks J, Braniff K. Impact of new diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2018;44:425–31
  12. Lee KW, Ching SM, Ramachandran V, Yee A, Hoo FK, Chia YC, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18:494
  13. Mwanri AW, Kinabo J, Ramaiya K, Feskens EJ. Gestational diabetes mellitus in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and metaregression on prevalence and risk factors. Trop Med Int Health 2015;20:983– 1002
  14. Karcaaltincaba D, Kandemir O, Yalvac S, Güvendag-Guven S, Haberal A. Prev