Journals / İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Tıp Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

IVF pregnancies is associated with increased risk for preeclampsia

İVF gebelikleri yüksek preeklampsi riski ile ilişkilidir

Pages
1–5
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: There was a higher incidence of preeclampsia among pregnancies conceived by IVF, but no significant association was found between incidence of, and intraute rine insemination and ovulation induction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study is to assess the associa tion of intrauterine insemination, in vitro fertilization (IVF) and ovulation induction with the risk of preeclampsia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: A population- based retrospective cohort study, pregnancies conceived by assisted reproduc tive technology referred to obstetric and gynecology department of our hospital, and pregnants who gave birth after 24 gestational weeks between 2006-2010 years were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: There was a higher incidence of preeclampsia among pregnancies conceived by IVF, but no significant association was found between incidence of, and intraute rine insemination and ovulation induction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006-2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to assess the associa tion of intrauterine insemination, in vitro fertilization (IVF) and ovulation induction with the risk of preeclampsia. Material and Methods: A population- based retrospective cohort study, pregnancies conceived by assisted reproduc tive technology referred to obstetric and gynecology department of our hospital, and pregnants who gave birth after 24 gestational weeks between 2006-2010 years were included in the study. Case group which consisted of 120 pregnant women who gave birth using assisted reproducti ve technology, and 480 controls who delivered their babies by natural methods were randomly matched by maternal age, parity, plurality and smoking during pregnancy. The risk of preeclampsia associated with intrauterine insemina tion (IUI), in vitro fertilization (IVF) and ovulation induc tion has been evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Results: In vitro fertilization was associated with an increased risk for preeclampsia (OR=3,91, 95 % CI: 1.34, 11.36), whe reas intrauterine insemination (OR=0.74, 95 % CI: 0.07, 7.41) and ovulation induction (OR=0.74, 95 % CI: 0.14, 3.81) was not associated with the risk for preeclampsia. Conclusion: There was a higher incidence of preeclampsia among pregnancies conceived by IVF, but no significant association was found between incidence of, and intraute rine insemination and ovulation induction.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı yardımcı üreme teknikleri(İUİ, İVF ve ovulasyon indüksiyonu) ile oluşmuş gebelik lerde preeklampsi gelişme riskini belirlemektir.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya populasyon tabanlı retrospektif bir çalışma olarak, 2006-2010 yılları arasında hastanemiz kadın hastalıkları ve doğum kliniğine başvurmuş ve doğumu hastanemizde gerçekleşmiş 24 hafta ve üzerigebelikler dâhil edildi. Olgu grubunda yardımcı üremeteknikleri ile gebe kalmış 120 gebe ile kontrol grubunda normal yollardan gebe kalmış 480 gebe karşılaştırıldı. Anne yaşı, parite, çoğulluk ve gebelikte sigara kullanımıgibi parametreler kontrol grubu ile eşleştirildi. İntrauterin inseminasyon (İUİ), in vitro fertilizasyon (İVF) ve ovulasyon indüksiyonu ile ilişkili preeklampsi riski kontrol grup ları ile karşılaştırılarak lojistik regresyon analizi ile değer- lendirildi.Bulgular: İn vitro fertilizasyon gebelikleri preeklampsiaçısından artmış risk ile ilişkiliyken (OR=3.91, % 95 CI: 1.34, 11.36), intrauterin inseminasyon (OR=0.74, % 95 CI: 0.07, 7.41) ve ovulasyon indüksiyonuyla (OR=0.74,% 95 CI: 0.14, 3.81) gebe kalmışlarda preeklampsi gelişi mi açısından anlamlı bir risk artışı izlenmedi.Sonuç: İVF ile oluşmuş gebeliklerde preeklampsi insidansıyüksektir fakat intrauterin inseminasyon ve ovulasyon indüksiyonuyla anlamlı bir ilişki bulunamamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

İNAN, C., ÖZER, A., TALAY, H., KARAMAN, E., KARAMAN, Y. (2022). IVF pregnancies is associated with increased risk for preeclampsia. İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 1–5. https://ajindex.com/articles/551181

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Mosher WD, Pratt WF. Fecundity and infertility in the United States: incidence and trends. Fertil Steril 1991
  2. PMid:2070846 2. Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS. Perinatal outcome in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta- analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004
  3. 103(3): 551-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000114989.84822.51 PMid:14990421 3. Smith GN, Walker M, Tessier JL, Millar KG. Increased incidence of preeclampsia in women conceiving by intrauteri- ne insemination with donor versus partner sperm for treatment of primary infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997
  4. 177(2):455-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70215-1 4. Erez O, Vardi IS, Hallak M, Hershkovitz R, Dukler D, Mazor M. Preeclampsia in twin gestations: association with IVF treatments, parity and maternal age. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006
  5. 19(3):141-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767050500246045 PMid:16690506 5. Kallen B, Finnstrom O, Nygren KG, Olausson PM, Wennerholm UB. In vitro fertilisation in Sweden: obstetric characteristic, maternal morbidity and mortality. BJOG 2005
  6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00745.x PMid:16225574 6. Shevell T, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Porter TF, Luthy DA, Comstock CH et al. Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005
  7. 106(5 pt 1):1039- 45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01733-1 7. Lynch A, McDuffie R, Murphy J, Faber K, Orleans M. Preeclampsia in multiple gestation: the role of assisted repro- ductive technologies. Obstet Gynecol 2002
  8. 99(3):445-51. 8. Calhoun KC, Barnhart KT, Elovitz MA, Srivinas MK. Evaluating the association between assisted conception and severity of preeclampsia. ISRN Obstetrics and gynecology 10.5402/2011/928592 9. Shevell T, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Porter TF, Luthy DA, Comstock CH et al. Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005
  9. 106(5 pt 1):1039- 45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000183593.24583.7c PMid:16260523 10. Lynch A, McDuffie R, Murphy J, Faber K, Orleans M. Preeclampsia in multiple gestation: the role of assisted reproductive technologies. Obstet Gynecol 2002
  10. 99(3):445-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01733-1 11. Maman E, Lunenfeld E, Levy A, Vardi H, Potashnik G. Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction compared with those conceived spontaneously. Fertil Steril 1998
  11. 70(2):240-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00160-5 12.