Journals / İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Tıp Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Open Abdominal Procedures in Gynecological and Obstetrical Complications: Single Surgeon and Single Center

Jinekolojik ve Obstetrik Komplikasyonlarda Açık Karın Uygulamaları: Tek Cerrah, Tek Merkez

Pages
159–166
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We conclude that treatment and follow-up by a single surgeon deserve the greatest merit for these successful results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In recent years, open abdominal procedures are life-saving alternatives in interventions widely performed for injury control or intraabdominal infection in critically ill patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For these reasons, we have retrospectively presented indications, complications, the morbidity and mortality rates of open abdominal procedures performed in the Obstetrics and Gynecology clinics of our hospital.Material and Methods: Twenty-two patients who had been priorly operated in the Obstetrics and Gynecology clinics of the Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital and then undergone, open abdominal procedures between January 2013 and May 2016 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We conclude that treatment and follow-up by a single surgeon deserve the greatest merit for these successful results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In recent years, open abdominal procedures are life-saving alternatives in interventions widely performed for injury control or intraabdominal infection in critically ill patients. Open abdominal procedures are commonly used in general surgery in patients with trauma or abdominal sepsis; they are life saving procedures with correct indications in other specialties operating in the abdomen, including clinics of gynecology, urology, cardiovascular surgery. For these reasons, we have retrospectively presented indications, complications, the morbidity and mortality rates of open abdominal procedures performed in the Obstetrics and Gynecology clinics of our hospital.Material and Methods: Twenty-two patients who had been priorly operated in the Obstetrics and Gynecology clinics of the Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital and then undergone, open abdominal procedures between January 2013 and May 2016 were included in the study. All these patients were treated with a vacuum assisted closure system. Demographic data, indications for the primary operations, fascial closure and morbidity/mortality rates of these patients were evaluated. Results: Twenty-two cases underwent open abdominal procedures with the indications of sepsis (n=22), and nonseptic (n=6) entities In 64% of the patients the anterior abdominal fascia was totally closed. Following open abdominal procedures, 6 (27%) cases local or systemic complicationswere observed. Six patients (27%) suffered from postoperative anxiety disorder which required treatment. No mortality was observed due to this procedure. Discussion and Conclusion: The patients we treated with open abdomen had lower morbidity and mortality and high complete fascial closure rates when compared to cases reported in the current literature. We conclude that treatment and follow-up by a single surgeon deserve the greatest merit for these successful results.

Özet

Amaç: Hasar kontrolü ve intraabdominal enfeksiyonlarda açık karın uygulaması son yıllarda kritik hastalarda yaygın olarak kullanılan yaşam kurtarıcı bir seçenektir. Genel cerrahi pratiğinde açık karın uygulaması travma ve abdominal sepsisli hastalarda uygulanmakta olup, karın cerrahisi ile uğraşan kadın-doğum, üroloji ve kalp damar cerrahisi gibi kliniklerde de doğru endikasyonlarla yaşam kurtarıcıdır. Bu amaçla hastanemiz kadın doğum kliniklerinde opere edilen hastalarda oluşan komplikasyonlarda, açık karın endikasyonlarını, uygulamalarını, morbidite ve mortalite oranlarını retrospektif olarak sunduk. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2013- Mayıs 2016 tarihleri arasında Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi'nde (KSSEAH) Jinekoloji ve Obstetri Kliniği'nde opere olan daha sonra açık karın endikasyonu konulan, takip ve tedavileri yapılan 22 hasta çalışmaya dâhil edildi. Tüm hastalara vakum yardımlı karın kapama sistemi uygulandı. Hastaların demografik verileri, endikasyonları, fasia kapama, morbidite ve mortalite oranları değerlendirildi.Bulgular: 22 kadın hastadan 16'sı septik, 6'sı non-septik nedenlerle açık karın yapıldı. Yüzde 64 hastada karın ön duvarı fasiası total olarak kapatıldı. Bu 22 hastanın 6'sında (%27) lokal ve sistemik komplikasyonlar görüldü. Altı hastada (%27) tedavi gerektirecek anksiyete bozukluğu izlendi ve işleme bağlı mortalite görülmedi. Tartışma ve Sonuç: Açık karın uygulamaları ile tedavi ettiğimiz hastalarındaki morbidite ve mortalite oranları literatüre kıyasla düşük olup, total fascia kapama oranımız ise yüksektir. Takip ve tedavinin tek cerrah tarafından yönetilmesinin bu başarıda etkili olduğunu düşünmekteyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUKENT, S. C. (2022). Open Abdominal Procedures in Gynecological and Obstetrical Complications: Single Surgeon and Single Center. İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 159–166. https://ajindex.com/articles/551113

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD. Damage control: an approach for improved survival in extanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. Journal of Trauma 1993;35:375-383.
  2. Barker DE, Kaufman HJ, Smith LA, Ciraulo DL, Richart CL. Vacuum Pack technique of temporary abdominal closure: a 7 year experience with 112 patients. Journal of Trauma 2000;48:201-207.
  3. Tsuei BJ, Skinner JC, Bernard AC, Kearney PA, Boulanger BR. The open peritoneal cavity etiology correlates with the likehood of fascial closure. Am Surg 2004: 652-6
  4. Mutafchiyski VM, Popivanov GI, Kjossev KT, Chipeva S. Open abdomen and VAC in severe diffuse peritonitis. J R Army Med Corps 2016;162(1):30-4.
  5. Billing A, Fröhlich D, Schildberg FW. Prediction of outcome using the Mannheim peritonitis index in 2003 patients. Peritonitis Study Group. BR J Surg 1994;81:209-13.
  6. Bohnen J, Boulanger M, Meakins JL, Mclean AP. Prognosis in general peritonitis. Relation to couse and risk factors. Arch Surg 1983;118:285-90.
  7. Bosscha K, Reijinders K, Hulstaert PF, Algra A, Van der Werken C. Prognostic scoring systems to predict outcome in peritonitis and intraabdominal sepsis. BR J Surg 1997;84:1532-4.
  8. Függer R, Rogy M, Herbst F, Schemper M, Schulz F. Validation study of the Mannheim Peritonitis Index. Chirurg 1988;59(9):598-601
  9. Yetişir F, Salman E, Özdemir F, Durak D, Özlü O, Kılıç M. Modified application of dynamic wound closure system in management of septic open abdomen. World J Trauma Critical Care Med 2013;1:1-8
  10. Meldrum DR, Moore FA, Moore EE, Franciose RJ, Sauaia A, Burch JM. Prospective characterization and selective management of the abdominal compartment syndrome. Am J Surg 1997;174:667-73.
  11. Mizuguchi Y, Matsumoto S, Kan H, Koizumi M, Kuriyama S, Uchida E. Successful treatment of necrotizing fasciitis after rectal surgery with the application of a negative-pressure wound therapy: A case study. J Nippon Med Sch 2015;82(6):290-4.
  12. Demetriades D. Total management of the open abdomen. Int Wound J 2012;9(Suppl 1):17-24.
  13. Bruhin A, Ferreira F, Chariker M, Smith J, Ru