Journals / İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Ultrasound and Elastography Findings in Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast

Memenin Filloid Tümörlerinde Ultrasonografi ve Elastografi Bulguları

Pages
195–200
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Radiologists should be aware of the radiologic- pathologic correlation of core biopsy results for planning surgical approach.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Phyllodes tumors (PTs) are rare neoplasms of the breast with a rapid growth potential.
📊
Key Findings & Data:PTs have an increased risks of metastases to lung and bone and also the chest wall invasion.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Radiologists should be aware of the radiologic- pathologic correlation of core biopsy results for planning surgical approach.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Phyllodes tumors (PTs) are rare neoplasms of the breast with a rapid growth potential. PTs have an increased risks of metastases to lung and bone and also the chest wall invasion. Therefore, early diagnosis and treatment is very crucial. Ultrasound (US) elastography is a US based modality providing information about tissue stiffness and elasticity. US elastography has been reported to help differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. In clinical practice, there are two different modalities; Strain Elastography (SE) and Shear Wave Elastography (SWE). The aim of this study is to define the US and elastography findings of PTs. Methods: Twenty-one patients diagnosed with PT at our breast center from January 2014 to January 2018 were retrospectively included in the study. Results: SWE of 13 and SE of 8 patients were evaluated. The lesions were categorized according to BI-RADS US classification as follows; soft (n=10, 47,6%), intermediate (n=8, 38%) and high (n=3, 14,4%). Median Strain Ratio was 7,72 (range; 0,95-19,14). Mean Shear Wave Velocity (SWV) was 3,3±1,18 m/s and 2,85 m/s±1,16 by VTIQ and VTQ methods respectively. Conclusion: In this study, we showed that most of the PTs showed soft or intermediate features in favor of benign lesions by elastography. Radiologists should be aware of the radiologic- pathologic correlation of core biopsy results for planning surgical approach.

Özet

Amaç: Filloid tümör (FT) memenin hızlı büyüme potansiyeline sahip ender görülen tümörüdür. FT’lerde artmış kemik ve akciğer metastazı ile göğüs duvarı invazyon riski bulunmaktadır. Bu nedenle erken tanı ve tedavileri çok önemlidir. Ultrason (US) elastografi yumuşak dokuların elastikiyeti ve sertliği hakkında bilgi veren bir US yöntemidir. Memede benign ve malign lezyon ayrımına katkı sağladığı bildirilmiştir. Klinik pratikte strain (gerinim) elastografi (SE) ve Shear Wave (makaslama) elastografi (SWE) olarak adlandırılan iki farklı metot kullanılmaktadır. Çalışmamızın amacı FT’lerin ultasonografi ve elastografi bulgularını tanımlamaktır. Yöntem: Çalışmamıza Ocak 2014 - Ocak 2018 tarihleri arasında meme kliniğimizde FT tanısı almış 21 olgu retrospektif olarak dahil edildi. Bulgular: On üç olguya ait SWE, 8 olguda da SE bulguları değerlendirildi. BI-RADS US sınıflamasına göre elastografik olarak 10 olgu yumuşak (%47,6), 8 olgu ara sertlikte (%38) ve 3 olgu (%14,4) da sert olarak sınıflandırıldı. SE ile ortanca “gerinim oranı” 7,72 (aralık; 0,95 - 19,14) ölçüldü. Olgularda ortalama Shear Wave Velocity (makaslama dalgası hız değeri, SWV) değerleri VTIQ ve VTQ metodları kullanılarak sırasıyla 3,3±1,18 m/s ve 2,85 m/s±1,16 olarak ölçüldü. Sonuç: Çalışmamızda FT’lerin çoğunluğunun benign tümör lehine elastografik olarak yumuşak veya ara sertlikte kodlandığını gösterdik. Radyologların bunu akılda tutmaları kalın iğne biyopsi sonuçlarının patoloji ile korelasyonunda ve cerrahi tedavi sürecinin yönetilmesinde önemlidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

POURBAGHER, A., ALADAĞ, H. (2022). Ultrasound and Elastography Findings in Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast. İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 195–200. https://ajindex.com/articles/550989

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Yilmaz E, Sal S, Lebe B. Differentiation of phyllodes tumors versus fibroadenomas. Acta Radiol. 2002;43(1):34-9
  2. Choi N, Kim K, Shin KH, Kim Y, Moon HG, Park W ve ark. Malignant and borderline phyllodes tumors of the breast: a multicenter study of 362 patients (KROG 16-08). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;171(2):335-44.
  3. Chen WH, Cheng SP, Tzen CY, Yang TL, Jeng KS, Liu CL ve ark. Surgical treatment of phyllodes tumors of the breast: retrospective review of 172 cases. J Surg Oncol. 2005;91(3):185-94.
  4. Mendelson EB, Böhm-Vélez M, Berg WA ve ark. ACRBI-RADS® ultrasound. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013
  5. Giannotti E, Vinnicombe S, Thomson K, McLean D, Purdie C ve ark. Shear-wave elastography and greysca-le assessment of palpable probably benign masses: Is biopsy always required? Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1062):20150865.
  6. Liu B, Zheng Y, Shan Q, Lu Y, Lin M, Tian W, et al. Elastography by acoustic radiation force impulse tech-nology for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: A meta-analysis. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2016;43(1):47-55.
  7. Lee SH, Chang JM, Kim WH, Bae MS, Seo M, Koo HR, et al. Added value of shear-wave elastography for evalua-tion of breast masses detected with screening US imaging. Radiology. 2014;273(1):61-9.
  8. Çebi Olgun D, Korkmazer B, Kılıç F, Dikici AS, Velidedeoğlu M, Aydoğan F, et al. Use of shear wave elastography to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014;20(3):239-44.
  9. Tan H, Zhang S, Liu H, Peng W, Li R, Gu Y, et al. Imaging findings in phyllodes tumors of the breast. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(1):e62-9.
  10. Yoo JL, Woo OH, Kim YK, Cho KR, Yong HS, Seo BK, et al. Can MR Imaging contribute in characterizing well-circumscribed breast carcinomas? Radiographics. 2010;30(6):1689-702.
  11. Chung EM, Cube R, Hall GJ, González C, Stocker JT, Glassman LM. From the archives of the AFIP: breast masses in children and adolescents: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2009;29(3):907-31.
  12. Liberman L, Bonaccio E, Hamele-Bena D, Abramson AF, Cohen MA, D