Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Abnormal Pap smear frequency and comparison of repeat cytological follow-up with colposcopy during patient management: the importance of pathologist’s guidance in the management

Pages
69–74
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Of 60 women with LSILthat underwent colposcopic biopsy, 13.3% (n=8) had CIN2/3.CONCLUSION: The results of the study suggest that routine cytological follow-up may be an appropriate method in themanagement of ASCUS instead of immediate colposcopy while immediate colposcopy cannot place repeat cytology for LSILin developing countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Cervical cancer contributes to a significant global health burden with room for improvement of primary prevention methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to determine the prevalence of Turkish women with abnormal cytology and their management by comparing results from repeat cytological analysis with close follow-up and colposcopy.METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 8738 women who underwent Pap smears at a single institution during 2011 wasperformed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Of 60 women with LSILthat underwent colposcopic biopsy, 13.3% (n=8) had CIN2/3.CONCLUSION: The results of the study suggest that routine cytological follow-up may be an appropriate method in themanagement of ASCUS instead of immediate colposcopy while immediate colposcopy cannot place repeat cytology for LSILin developing countries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cervical cancer contributes to a significant global health burden with room for improvement of primary prevention methods. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of Turkish women with abnormal cytology and their management by comparing results from repeat cytological analysis with close follow-up and colposcopy.METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 8738 women who underwent Pap smears at a single institution during 2011 wasperformed. Either repeat cytological analysis or colposcopic biopsy was used for follow-up evaluation of women who hadabnormal index cytology.RESULTS: From the 8670 women, 8259 of had normal cytology results (95.3%) and 411 women had abnormal cytology(4.7%) in the index Pap smear. The frequency of initial abnormal cytology was 65% (n=267), 27% (n=111), 3.4% (n=14),2.4% (n=10), 1.9% (n=8), and 0.3% (n=1) for atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-gradesquamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), ASC cannot exclude high-grade intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H), high-grade SIL (HSIL),atypical glandular cells (AGC), and invasive cancer, respectively. Of the 267 women with initial ASCUS, 108 (40.4%) underwent repeat cytology analysis, 84 (31.5%) underwent colposcopic biopsy, and 75 (28.1%) were lost to follow-up. Onhistopathology, 8.3% (n=7) of patients had cervical intraepithelial neoplasm 2 (CIN2) on colposcopy. Of 60 women with LSILthat underwent colposcopic biopsy, 13.3% (n=8) had CIN2/3.CONCLUSION: The results of the study suggest that routine cytological follow-up may be an appropriate method in themanagement of ASCUS instead of immediate colposcopy while immediate colposcopy cannot place repeat cytology for LSILin developing countries.

🔖

Cite This Article

VATANSEVER, D., BOZDAĞ, H., ARSLAN, E., GÖKDAĞLI, F., KARSY, M. (2022). Abnormal Pap smear frequency and comparison of repeat cytological follow-up with colposcopy during patient management: the importance of pathologist’s guidance in the management. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 69–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/550911

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012. Available at: http://www.globocan.iarc. fr/ Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx
  2. Bassal R, Schejter E, Bachar R, Shapira H, Sandbank J, Supino Rosin L, et al. Cervical pap screening among Israeli women, 2005-2010. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014;289:615–22. [CrossRef ] 3. Noller KL. Cervical cytology screening and evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:391–7. [CrossRef ] 4. Arbyn M, Buntinx F, Van Ranst M, Paraskevaidis E, Martin-Hirsch P, Dillner J, et al. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal pap smears: A meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:280–93. [CrossRef ] 5. John OS, Joseph IS, Lisa MH, Barbara LH, Karen DB, Gary C. Willams Gynecology. 1st ed. Texas: Mc Graw Hill Medical; 2008. p. 617-45
  3. Garrett LA, McCann CK. Abnormal cytology in 2012: Management of atypical squamous cells, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, and highgrade intraepithelial neoplasia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2013;56:25–34
  4. Sundström K, Lu D, Elfström KM, Wang J, Andrae B, Dillner J, et al. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: A nationwide cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;216:48.e1–15. [CrossRef ] 8. Marcos Lopes AC, Campaner AB, Henrique LQ. Prevalence of high- -grade intraepithelial neoplasia in patients with cytology presenting atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Acta Cytol 2016;60:139–44. [CrossRef ] 9. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O’Connor D, Prey M, et al. The 2001 bethesda system: Terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002;287:2114–9. [CrossRef ] 10. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69–90. [CrossRef ] 11. ASCUS-LSIL Traige Study (ALTS) Group. A randomized trial on the management of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology interpretations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1393–400. [CrossRef ] 12. National Cancer Institute. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009. 74 North Clin Istanb Available at: http://www.seer.cancer.gov/csr/ 1975_2009_pops09. Accessed May 31, 2016
  5. Stolnicu S, Musca S, Micu D, Micu L, Moldovan C, Puscasiu L, et al. Prevalence of abnormal pap smears in a consecutive and previously unscreened population in Romania.