SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnönü üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Sperm DNA Fragmantation Analysis Methods in Infertile Couples for Assessing Genomic Instability

İNFERTİL ÇİFTLERDE SPERM GENOMİK STABİLİTESİNİN BELİRLENMESİNDE DNA FRAGMANTASYONU ANALİZ YÖNTEMLERİ

Şengül YÜKSEL
Pages
67–80
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this review is to evaluate the methods developed to test the damage and fragmentation of sperm DNA in clinical practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Environmental stress, gene mutations, and chromosomal abnormalities can all affect the steps of spermatogenesis, which in turn may lead to abnormal chromatin structure causing infertility.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In couples with DNA-damaged sperm, in vitro fertilization failure may also frequently be seen as recurrent pregnancy loss.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this review is to evaluate the methods developed to test the damage and fragmentation of sperm DNA in clinical practice.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İnfertilite · Sperm · DNA fragmantasyonu

Abstract

Environmental stress, gene mutations, and chromosomal abnormalities can all affect the steps of spermatogenesis, which in turn may lead to abnormal chromatin structure causing infertility. In couples with DNA-damaged sperm, in vitro fertilization failure may also frequently be seen as recurrent pregnancy loss. In addition, embryos which are fertilized with sperm which have DNA fragmentation disorder are under the risk of developing congenital malformations or childhood cancers, even if the embryos have survived the pregnancy period without any problems. Therefore, sperm DNA fragmentation test before the and selection of the best cells is vital when assisted reproductive techniques are applied. There are many different methods of detecting sperm DNA damage used today. The aim of this review is to evaluate the methods developed to test the damage and fragmentation of sperm DNA in clinical practice.

Özet

Çevresel stres, gen mutasyonları ve kromozomal anormalliklerin tamamı, spermatogenez sırasındaki tüm aşamaları etkileyebilir, bu da sonuçta, infertiliteye sebep olan anormal kromatin yapısına yol açabilir. DNA hasarlı sperm taşıyan kişilerde tüp bebek başarısızlığı da tekrarlayan gebelik kaybı da sık görülmektedir. Ayrıca, DNA fragmantasyon bozukluğu olan spermle döllenmiş olan yumurtalardan oluşan embriyolar gebelik dönemini sorunsuz atlatmış olsa bile, teorik olarak konjenital malformasyonlar ve çocukluk çağı kanserleri gelişimi açısından risk altındadır. Bu nedenle yardımcı üreme teknikleri uygulanırken tedavi öncesi sperm DNA fragmantasyon testi uygulanması ve en iyi hücrelerin seçilmesi hayati önem taşımaktadır. Günümüzde kullanılan çok farklı sperm DNA hasarı belirleme yöntemleri mevcuttur. Bu derlemenin amacı sperm DNA’sında oluşan hasar ve fragmantasyonları test etmek için geliştirilen yöntemlerin klinik kullanımdaki yerleri ile birlikte değerlendirmektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜKSEL, Ş. (2022). Sperm DNA Fragmantation Analysis Methods in Infertile Couples for Assessing Genomic Instability. İnönü üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 67–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/548384

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Agarwal, A., Virk, G., Ong, C., Plessis, S. (2014). Effect of Oxidative Stress on Male Reproduction. World J Mens Health, 32: 1–17.
  2. Alvarez, J.G. (2003). DNA fragmentation in humanspermatozoa: significance in the diagnosis and treatment of infertility. Minerva Ginecol, 55:233-9.
  3. Arnon, J., Meirow, D., Lewis-Roness, H., Ornoy, A. (2001). Genetic and teratogenic effects of cancer treatments on gametes and embryos.Hum Reprod Update. 7:394-403
  4. Belva, F., Bonduelle, M., Roelants, M., Michielsen, D., et al. (2016). Semen quality of young adult ICSI offspring: the first results. Hum Reprod, 31, 2811-20.
  5. Bradley, C.K., McArthur, S.J., Gee, A. et al. (2016). Intervention improve sassisted conception intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes for patients with high levels of sperm dna fragmentation: a retrospectiveanalysis. Andrology, 4:903-10.
  6. Carrell, D.T., Liu, L. (2001). Altered protamine 2 expression is uncommon in donors of known fertility, but common among men with poor fertilizing capacity, and may reflect other abnormalities of spermiogenesis. J Androl, 22:604-10.
  7. Cissen, M., Wely, M.V., Scholten, I., Mansell, S.,et al. (2016). Measuring sperm dna fragmentation and clinical outcomes of medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 11(11), e0165125. Donald, P., Everson, D.P. (2006). Clinical aspects of sperm DNA fragmentation detection and male infertility, Theriogenology, 65(5); 979-991.
  8. Erenpreiss, J., Hlevicka, S., Zalkalns, J., Erenpreisa, J. (2002). Effect of leukocytospermia on sperm DNA integrity: a negative effect in abnormal semen samples.J Androl. 23:717-23.
  9. Erenpreiss, J., Jepson, K., Giwercman, A., Tsarev, I., et al. (2004). Toluidine blue cytometry test for sperm DNA conformation: comparison with the fowcytometric sperm chromatin structure and TUNEL assays. Hum Reprod,19, 2277-82.
  10. Evenson D.P., Wixon, R. (2006). Clinical aspects of sperm DNA fragmentation detection and male infertility. Theriogenology, 65(5), 979-91.
  11. Gatewood, J.M., Cook, G.R., Balhorn, R., Bradbury, E.M., Schmid, C.W. (1987). Sequence-specific packaging of dna in human sperm chromatin.Science, 236:962-4.
  12. Gelbaya, T.A., Potdar, N., Jeve, Y.B., Nardo, L.G. (2014). Definition and epidemiology of unexplained infertility. ObstetGynecolSurv, 69:109-15.
  13. Gosalvez, J., Gonzalez-Martinez, M., Lopez-Fernandez, C., et al. (2011). Shorter abstinence decreases sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in ejaculate. Fertil Steril, 96:1083-6.
  14. Güneş, S., Sevg